Mareva Injunction

简明释义

玛瑞瓦禁令

英英释义

例句

1.After reviewing the evidence, the court issued a Mareva Injunction to freeze the company's assets.

在审查证据后，法庭发出了海雷瓦禁令，以冻结公司的资产。

2.The court granted a Mareva Injunction to prevent the defendant from dissipating assets before the trial.

法庭授予了海雷瓦禁令，以防止被告在审判前转移资产。

3.The judge emphasized that a Mareva Injunction is a serious measure and should not be taken lightly.

法官强调，海雷瓦禁令是一项严肃的措施，不应轻视。

4.The plaintiff argued that without a Mareva Injunction, the defendant could easily hide their wealth.

原告辩称，如果没有海雷瓦禁令，被告很容易隐藏他们的财富。

5.In order to secure her claim, she applied for a Mareva Injunction against her ex-husband.

为了保障她的索赔，她向前夫申请了海雷瓦禁令。

作文

The legal landscape is filled with various remedies that aim to protect the rights of individuals and entities in disputes. One such remedy is the Mareva Injunction, a powerful tool in civil litigation that allows a party to freeze the assets of another party pending the outcome of a trial. This injunction is particularly useful in cases where there is a risk that the defendant may dissipate their assets, making it difficult for the claimant to enforce a judgment if they win. The term originates from the case of Mareva Compania Naviera SA v. International Bulkcarriers SA in 1975, where the English courts first recognized the need for such an order.A Mareva Injunction operates by preventing the defendant from dealing with their assets in a way that would frustrate any potential judgment against them. For example, if a creditor believes that a debtor is planning to sell or hide their assets to avoid paying a debt, they can apply for a Mareva Injunction to ensure that the assets remain available to satisfy any future court order. This type of injunction is not granted lightly; the applicant must demonstrate a strong case, showing that there is a real risk of asset dissipation.The process of obtaining a Mareva Injunction involves several steps. First, the applicant must file an application with the court, providing evidence of their claim and the reasons why the injunction is necessary. The court will then consider whether to grant the injunction on an interim basis, often without the presence of the defendant, as it is crucial to act quickly before the assets are moved or hidden. If granted, the injunction will typically require the defendant to disclose their assets and refrain from dealing with them until the court hears the full case.One of the key features of a Mareva Injunction is that it can be applied to both tangible and intangible assets. This means that bank accounts, properties, and even shares in a company can be frozen under this order. However, it is important to note that the injunction does not determine the merits of the underlying case; it simply preserves the status quo until a judgment can be made.Critics of the Mareva Injunction argue that it can be misused, leading to unnecessary hardship for defendants who may be facing unjust claims. There are safeguards in place, such as the requirement for the applicant to provide an undertaking to pay damages if it turns out that the injunction was wrongly granted. This ensures that defendants have some level of protection against frivolous or malicious claims.In conclusion, the Mareva Injunction serves as an essential tool in the arsenal of civil litigation, allowing claimants to secure their interests while awaiting a resolution to their disputes. Its ability to prevent the dissipation of assets makes it a valuable remedy in situations where there is a genuine concern that a defendant may attempt to evade their legal obligations. Understanding the implications and procedures surrounding a Mareva Injunction is crucial for both legal practitioners and individuals involved in litigation, as it underscores the balance between protecting rights and ensuring fairness in the judicial process.

法律领域充满了各种旨在保护个人和实体在争议中权利的救济措施。其中一种救济措施是Mareva Injunction，这是一种强有力的民事诉讼工具，允许一方在审判结果未出之前冻结另一方的资产。这种禁令在被告可能会耗尽其资产的案件中特别有用，这使得原告在胜诉后很难执行判决。这个术语源于1975年的Mareva Compania Naviera SA诉International Bulkcarriers SA案，英格兰法院首次承认了这种命令的必要性。Mareva Injunction通过阻止被告以任何方式处理其资产来运作，从而使任何潜在的判决无法得到满足。例如，如果债权人认为债务人计划出售或隐藏其资产以避免支付债务，他们可以申请Mareva Injunction以确保这些资产仍然可以用于满足未来的法庭命令。这种类型的禁令不会轻易授予；申请人必须提供强有力的案例，表明存在资产耗散的真实风险。获得Mareva Injunction的过程涉及几个步骤。首先，申请人必须向法院提交申请，提供其索赔的证据以及禁令必要性的理由。法院将考虑是否在临时基础上授予禁令，通常是在没有被告出席的情况下，因为在资产被转移或隐藏之前迅速采取行动至关重要。如果获得批准，禁令通常要求被告披露其资产，并在法庭听取完整案件之前不得处理这些资产。Mareva Injunction的一个关键特点是它可以适用于有形和无形资产。这意味着银行账户、财产甚至公司的股份都可以根据该命令被冻结。然而，重要的是要注意，禁令并不决定基础案件的优劣；它只是为了在判决作出之前保持现状。批评者认为，Mareva Injunction可能被滥用，导致面对不公正索赔的被告遭受不必要的困难。为此，有一些保障措施，例如要求申请人提供担保，以便在禁令被错误授予的情况下支付损害赔偿。这确保了被告在面对无理或恶意索赔时有一定程度的保护。总之，Mareva Injunction作为民事诉讼中的一个重要工具，使原告能够在等待争议解决的同时保护他们的利益。它防止资产耗散的能力，使其在存在真正担忧被告可能试图逃避法律义务的情况下成为一种有价值的救济措施。理解与Mareva Injunction相关的影响和程序对法律从业者和参与诉讼的个人至关重要，因为这突显了保护权利与确保司法过程公平之间的平衡。