malicious falsehood

简明释义

恶意欺诈

英英释义

例句

1.The politician was accused of spreading a malicious falsehood 恶意虚假信息 about his opponent to gain votes.

这位政治家被指控散布关于对手的恶意虚假信息 malicious falsehood以获取选票。

2.The rumor circulating in the office was nothing more than a malicious falsehood 恶意虚假信息 designed to undermine her credibility.

办公室里流传的谣言不过是一个旨在破坏她信誉的恶意虚假信息 malicious falsehood。

3.She filed a lawsuit against the magazine for publishing a malicious falsehood 恶意虚假信息 that damaged her reputation.

她对该杂志提起诉讼，因其发布了损害她声誉的恶意虚假信息 malicious falsehood。

4.The court ruled that the statement made by the defendant was a malicious falsehood 恶意虚假信息 and awarded damages to the plaintiff.

法庭裁定被告的陈述属于恶意虚假信息 malicious falsehood，并判给原告赔偿。

5.He was careful not to engage in any malicious falsehood 恶意虚假信息 during the debate, focusing instead on factual arguments.

他在辩论中小心翼翼地避免任何恶意虚假信息 malicious falsehood，而是专注于事实论据。

作文

In today's fast-paced digital world, the spread of information can happen in the blink of an eye. While this rapid dissemination has its benefits, it also poses significant risks, particularly when it comes to the concept of malicious falsehood. A malicious falsehood refers to a statement that is not only false but is also made with the intent to harm someone or damage their reputation. This type of misinformation can take many forms, from social media posts to news articles, and can have devastating consequences for individuals and organizations alike.One of the most prominent examples of malicious falsehood in recent years has been seen in political campaigns. Candidates often find themselves victims of rumors and false claims that are deliberately crafted to discredit them. For instance, during election seasons, opponents may circulate fabricated stories about a candidate's past or make unfounded accusations about their character. These malicious falsehoods can sway public opinion and influence the outcome of elections, demonstrating the power and danger of misinformation.Moreover, the rise of social media platforms has exacerbated the issue of malicious falsehood. With millions of users sharing content daily, a single false statement can go viral within hours. This rapid spread makes it increasingly difficult to control the narrative or correct the misinformation. In many cases, once a malicious falsehood is out in the public domain, it can be challenging to retract or clarify, leading to long-lasting damage to reputations.Beyond politics, malicious falsehoods can also affect businesses and public figures. Companies may face boycotts or loss of customers due to false claims about their products or practices. For example, if a rumor spreads that a company is using harmful ingredients in its products, consumers may choose to stop buying from them, regardless of the truth. This not only impacts the company's bottom line but can also lead to job losses and economic downturns in the communities that rely on those businesses.The legal implications of malicious falsehood are also significant. Many jurisdictions have laws against defamation, which encompasses statements that are both false and damaging to an individual's reputation. Victims of malicious falsehood can seek legal recourse, but the process can be lengthy and costly. Additionally, proving that a statement was made with malice can be challenging, as it requires evidence that the person making the statement knew it was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.To combat the spread of malicious falsehood, it is crucial for individuals to develop critical thinking skills and verify information before sharing it. Media literacy programs can help educate the public about the importance of checking sources and understanding the motives behind certain narratives. Additionally, social media companies must take responsibility for monitoring and addressing false information on their platforms to protect users from the harmful effects of malicious falsehood.In conclusion, malicious falsehood poses a serious threat to individuals, businesses, and society as a whole. As we navigate an increasingly complex information landscape, it is essential to remain vigilant and discerning. By understanding the nature of malicious falsehoods and taking proactive steps to combat misinformation, we can work towards a more informed and truthful society.

在当今快速发展的数字世界中，信息的传播可以在一瞬间发生。虽然这种快速传播有其好处，但它也带来了重大风险，特别是在“恶意虚假陈述”的概念上。“恶意虚假陈述”是指一种不仅不真实而且出于伤害某人或损害其声誉的意图而做出的陈述。这种类型的错误信息可以采取多种形式，从社交媒体帖子到新闻文章，并可能对个人和组织造成毁灭性的后果。近年来，“恶意虚假陈述”的一个显著例子出现在政治竞选中。候选人经常发现自己成为谣言和虚假指控的受害者，这些谣言和指控是故意编造的，目的是为了诋毁他们。例如，在选举季节，对手可能会传播关于候选人过去的虚构故事，或对他们的性格提出毫无根据的指控。这些恶意虚假陈述可以影响公众舆论，并影响选举结果，展示了错误信息的力量和危险。此外，社交媒体平台的兴起加剧了“恶意虚假陈述”的问题。每天有数百万用户分享内容，一条虚假的陈述可以在几个小时内迅速传播。这种快速传播使得控制叙事或纠正错误信息变得越来越困难。在许多情况下，一旦恶意虚假陈述进入公共领域，就很难撤回或澄清，从而导致声誉的长期损害。除了政治之外，“恶意虚假陈述”还可能影响企业和公众人物。公司可能因有关其产品或做法的虚假声明而面临抵制或客户流失。例如，如果谣言传播某公司在其产品中使用有害成分，消费者可能会选择停止购买，无论事实如何。这不仅影响公司的利润，还可能导致依赖这些企业的社区的失业和经济衰退。“恶意虚假陈述”的法律含义也很重要。许多司法管辖区对诽谤有法律规定，这包括那些既虚假又损害个人声誉的陈述。“恶意虚假陈述”的受害者可以寻求法律救济，但这一过程可能漫长且昂贵。此外，证明某一陈述是出于恶意的挑战，因为这需要证据证明发言者知道其虚假或对真相的鲁莽无视。为了打击恶意虚假陈述的传播，个人必须培养批判性思维能力，并在分享信息之前进行验证。媒体素养项目可以帮助公众了解检查来源和理解某些叙述背后动机的重要性。此外，社交媒体公司必须对监控和处理其平台上的虚假信息负责，以保护用户免受恶意虚假陈述的有害影响。总之，恶意虚假陈述对个人、企业和整个社会构成严重威胁。在我们驾驭日益复杂的信息环境时，保持警惕和洞察力至关重要。通过理解恶意虚假陈述的性质并采取主动措施打击错误信息，我们可以朝着一个更具信息性和真实的社会努力。