interrogations

简明释义

英[ɪnˈtɛrəɡeɪʃənz]美[ɪnˈtɛrəɡeɪʃənz]

n. [法]审问（interrogation 的复数）；[计][通信]询问

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.And we talked, without interrogations, without complaints, late into the night.

我们交谈着，没有审问，没有抱怨，直到夜深人静。

2.Though they endured harsh conditions and repeated interrogations, the CIA said the men had never been tortured.

虽然他们身处恶劣的环境，还要忍受再三的审讯，CIA称他们从没遭到虐待。

3.He was caught on camera between interrogations taking sips of the liquid. The plan didn't quite work, though.

他在审讯过程中小口吸食修正液的行为被摄像机拍了下来。

4.She hated her parents' endless interrogations about where she'd been.

她讨厌她的父母没完没了地盘问她去哪里了。

5.We had to rely on truth drugs, long interrogations, and training drills designed to show any duplicity.

我们不得不依靠坦白剂，冗长的提问，设计好的训练性练习，以显现你的任何可疑之处。

6.When he was an Illinois state senator, President Obama successfully pressed for the videotaping of homicide interrogations and confessions.

当奥巴马是伊利诺州的参议员时，曾成功的执行了对杀人犯的审讯和供述的拍摄。

7.He said he had the right to silence during the police interrogations.

他说警察审问时他有权保持沉默。

8.He was caught on camera between interrogations taking sips4 of the liquid.

他是在审问间隙喝下修正液的，此行为被摄像机拍了下来。

9.The detective specialized in psychological tactics during interrogations.

侦探专门研究在审讯中使用心理战术。

10.During the interrogations, the suspect remained calm and provided consistent answers.

在审讯期间，嫌疑人保持冷静，并提供了一致的答案。

11.The lawyer was present during all interrogations to ensure his client's rights were protected.

律师在所有的审讯中在场，以确保其客户的权利受到保护。

12.The police conducted several interrogations to gather evidence for the case.

警方进行了几次审讯以收集案件证据。

13.Some interrogations can last for hours, depending on the complexity of the case.

某些审讯可能会持续数小时，这取决于案件的复杂性。

作文

Interrogations are a critical aspect of law enforcement and intelligence gathering. They involve the systematic questioning of individuals to obtain information, confessions, or insights about criminal activities. The process of interrogations (审问) can vary significantly depending on the context in which they are conducted, ranging from police investigations to military operations. In this essay, I will explore the methods, ethical considerations, and effectiveness of interrogations in different scenarios.One of the primary goals of interrogations is to elicit truthful information from suspects or witnesses. Law enforcement agencies often employ various techniques to achieve this objective. These may include building rapport with the individual, using psychological tactics, or presenting evidence that contradicts the suspect's statements. For instance, a skilled interrogator might create a non-threatening environment to encourage cooperation. This approach can lead to more productive conversations and, ultimately, to the acquisition of crucial information.However, the methods used during interrogations can sometimes raise ethical concerns. The use of coercive tactics, such as intimidation or physical force, has been widely criticized. Such methods not only violate human rights but can also lead to unreliable information. When individuals are subjected to extreme pressure, they may provide false confessions simply to escape the situation. Therefore, it is essential for law enforcement agencies to adhere to ethical standards that prioritize the dignity and rights of the individual being questioned.In addition to ethical considerations, the effectiveness of interrogations can be influenced by cultural factors. Different societies have varying perceptions of authority and trust, which can affect how individuals respond to questioning. For example, in some cultures, direct confrontation may be seen as disrespectful, leading to resistance during the interrogations (审问). Understanding these cultural nuances is crucial for effective communication and information gathering.Moreover, the advent of technology has transformed the landscape of interrogations. With the rise of digital communication and surveillance tools, investigators now have access to a wealth of information that can aid in their questioning. Social media, for example, can provide insights into an individual's behavior and associations, which can be leveraged during the interrogations. However, this reliance on technology must be balanced with traditional interrogation techniques to ensure a comprehensive approach.In conclusion, interrogations play a vital role in the pursuit of justice and security. While they can be effective in obtaining valuable information, it is imperative that they are conducted ethically and with respect for the individual’s rights. As society continues to evolve, so too must the methods of interrogations, incorporating cultural awareness and technological advancements. By doing so, law enforcement can enhance the integrity and effectiveness of their investigative processes, ultimately contributing to a fairer and more just society.

审问是执法和情报收集的重要方面。它们涉及对个人进行系统的询问，以获取信息、供述或关于犯罪活动的见解。审问的过程可以根据其进行的背景显著不同，从警察调查到军事行动。在这篇文章中，我将探讨在不同场景中审问的方法、伦理考虑和有效性。审问的主要目标之一是从嫌疑人或证人那里获取真实的信息。执法机构通常采用各种技术来实现这一目标。这些技术可能包括与个人建立融洽关系、使用心理战术或展示与嫌疑人陈述相矛盾的证据。例如，一位熟练的审问者可能会创造一个不具威胁性的环境，以鼓励合作。这种方法可以导致更富有成效的对话，并最终获得关键的信息。然而，在审问过程中使用的方法有时会引发伦理担忧。使用强制性手段，如恐吓或身体暴力，已受到广泛批评。这些方法不仅侵犯人权，还可能导致不可靠的信息。当个人受到极大压力时，他们可能会为了逃避困境而提供虚假的供述。因此，执法机构必须遵循优先考虑被询问个体尊严和权利的伦理标准。除了伦理考虑外，审问的有效性还可能受到文化因素的影响。不同社会对权威和信任的看法各异，这会影响个人对质询的反应。例如，在某些文化中，直接对抗可能被视为不尊重，导致在审问（审问）时的抵抗。理解这些文化细微差别对于有效沟通和信息收集至关重要。此外，技术的出现改变了审问的格局。随着数字通信和监控工具的兴起，调查人员现在可以访问大量信息，这些信息可以帮助他们进行询问。例如，社交媒体可以提供有关个人行为和关联的见解，这可以在审问过程中加以利用。然而，这种对技术的依赖必须与传统的审问技术相平衡，以确保全面的方法。总之，审问在追求正义和安全中发挥着至关重要的作用。虽然它们在获取有价值的信息方面可能是有效的，但进行审问时必须遵循伦理原则，并尊重个人的权利。随着社会的不断发展，审问的方法也必须不断演变，融入文化意识和技术进步。通过这样做，执法部门可以增强其调查过程的完整性和有效性，最终有助于建立一个更加公正和公平的社会。