International Whaling Commission

简明释义

国际捕鲸委员会

英英释义

例句

1.Many countries support the ban on whaling proposed by the International Whaling Commission 国际捕鲸委员会.

许多国家支持国际捕鲸委员会提议的捕鲸禁令。

2.During the annual meeting, the International Whaling Commission 国际捕鲸委员会 discussed new conservation measures.

在年度会议上，国际捕鲸委员会讨论了新的保护措施。

3.The International Whaling Commission 国际捕鲸委员会 was established to regulate whaling activities globally.

国际捕鲸委员会成立的目的是为了全球监管捕鲸活动。

4.The International Whaling Commission 国际捕鲸委员会 has implemented strict regulations to protect endangered whale species.

国际捕鲸委员会已经实施严格的规定，以保护濒危鲸鱼种类。

5.Researchers presented their findings on whale populations at the International Whaling Commission 国际捕鲸委员会 conference.

研究人员在国际捕鲸委员会会议上展示了他们对鲸鱼种群的研究结果。

作文

The issue of whaling has been a contentious topic for decades, drawing attention from environmentalists, governments, and the general public alike. One of the key organizations involved in the regulation of whaling activities is the International Whaling Commission, or IWC. Established in 1946, the International Whaling Commission was created to provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and to ensure that whaling is carried out in a sustainable manner. Over the years, the commission has evolved to address not only the management of whaling but also the broader issues of marine conservation and the protection of cetaceans. The International Whaling Commission plays a crucial role in setting quotas for whaling nations, monitoring whale populations, and conducting scientific research to inform its policies. One of the most significant actions taken by the IWC was the implementation of a moratorium on commercial whaling in 1986, which aimed to allow whale populations to recover from years of overexploitation. This moratorium has been a point of contention, particularly for countries like Japan, Norway, and Iceland, which continue to engage in whaling under various exemptions. Critics argue that the International Whaling Commission has not been effective enough in enforcing its regulations and that some member countries exploit loopholes to continue whaling practices that are detrimental to whale populations. For example, Japan has conducted what it calls 'scientific whaling,' arguing that it is necessary for research purposes. However, many environmental groups contend that this is merely a guise for commercial whaling, undermining the very principles that the International Whaling Commission was established to uphold. In addition to regulating whaling, the International Whaling Commission also focuses on broader marine conservation efforts. It recognizes the interconnectedness of ocean ecosystems and the importance of protecting not just whales but also their habitats. The commission has initiated various programs aimed at addressing issues such as climate change, pollution, and bycatch, which pose significant threats to marine life. The effectiveness of the International Whaling Commission often hinges on the cooperation of its member states. With varying interests and priorities, achieving consensus can be challenging. Some countries prioritize economic benefits from whaling, while others advocate for conservation and ethical treatment of marine animals. This divergence of views complicates the decision-making process within the commission and highlights the need for ongoing dialogue and collaboration. Ultimately, the future of whaling and marine conservation may depend on the ability of the International Whaling Commission to adapt to changing circumstances and to foster a more inclusive approach that considers the perspectives of all stakeholders. As public awareness of environmental issues continues to grow, there is hope that the commission can strengthen its efforts to protect whale populations and ensure the sustainability of our oceans for generations to come. In conclusion, the International Whaling Commission remains a vital entity in the fight against whaling and in the promotion of marine conservation, but its success will rely on the commitment and cooperation of its member nations.

捕鲸问题几十年来一直是一个有争议的话题，引起了环保主义者、政府和公众的广泛关注。参与捕鲸活动监管的关键组织之一是国际捕鲸委员会（IWC）。该委员会成立于1946年，旨在为鲸鱼资源的适当保护提供保障，并确保捕鲸活动以可持续的方式进行。多年来，委员会的发展不仅涉及捕鲸管理，还关注更广泛的海洋保护和鲸类动物的保护问题。国际捕鲸委员会在为捕鲸国家设定配额、监测鲸鱼种群以及进行科学研究以指导其政策方面发挥着至关重要的作用。1986年，IWC实施了商业捕鲸禁令，这是其采取的最重要措施之一，旨在使鲸鱼种群从多年的过度开发中恢复。这个禁令引发了争议，特别是对于日本、挪威和冰岛等国，这些国家在各种豁免下继续进行捕鲸。批评者认为，国际捕鲸委员会在执行其规定方面的有效性不足，一些成员国利用漏洞继续进行对鲸鱼种群有害的捕鲸活动。例如，日本进行所谓的“科学捕鲸”，声称这对于研究目的至关重要。然而，许多环保组织认为这仅仅是商业捕鲸的幌子，破坏了国际捕鲸委员会成立时所秉持的原则。除了监管捕鲸外，国际捕鲸委员会还专注于更广泛的海洋保护工作。它认识到海洋生态系统的相互联系，以及保护鲸鱼及其栖息地的重要性。该委员会启动了多项旨在解决气候变化、污染和误捕等问题的计划，这些问题对海洋生物构成了重大威胁。国际捕鲸委员会的有效性通常取决于其成员国的合作。由于利益和优先事项的不同，达成共识可能具有挑战性。一些国家优先考虑捕鲸带来的经济利益，而另一些国家则倡导保护和对海洋动物的伦理对待。这种观点的分歧使得委员会内部的决策过程复杂化，突显了持续对话与合作的必要性。最终，捕鲸和海洋保护的未来可能取决于国际捕鲸委员会适应变化的能力，以及促进更具包容性的方法，以考虑所有利益相关者的观点。随着公众对环境问题的意识不断提高，人们希望该委员会能够加强保护鲸鱼种群的努力，并确保我们的海洋在未来几代人中保持可持续性。总之，国际捕鲸委员会在反对捕鲸和促进海洋保护方面仍然是一个至关重要的机构，但其成功将依赖于其成员国家的承诺与合作。