Gold Clause
简明释义
黄金条款
英英释义
A gold clause is a provision in a contract that specifies payment in gold or its equivalent value rather than in currency. | 黄金条款是在合同中规定以黄金或其等值而非货币进行支付的条款。 |
例句
1.The contract included a Gold Clause to protect against inflation.
该合同包含一个金条条款以保护免受通货膨胀的影响。
2.The Gold Clause in the lease agreement allows for adjustments based on gold prices.
租赁协议中的金条条款允许根据黄金价格进行调整。
3.The Gold Clause was added to safeguard the interests of the investors.
为了保护投资者的利益,添加了金条条款。
4.Investors often look for bonds with a Gold Clause to ensure value retention.
投资者通常寻找带有金条条款的债券以确保价值保留。
5.During economic uncertainty, many contracts revert to a Gold Clause for stability.
在经济不确定时期,许多合同会恢复使用金条条款以保持稳定。
作文
The concept of the Gold Clause has played a significant role in the economic history of the United States. A Gold Clause refers to a provision in a contract that allows for payment in gold or its equivalent value. This clause was particularly prevalent in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, during a time when the gold standard was a dominant monetary system. The Gold Clause was designed to protect creditors against inflation and devaluation of currency, ensuring that payments would retain their value over time.Historically, the Gold Clause gained prominence during the Great Depression. Many contracts included these clauses to safeguard the interests of lenders and investors. However, as the economic crisis deepened, the U.S. government sought to stabilize the economy by abandoning the gold standard. In 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an executive order that effectively nullified all Gold Clauses in private contracts. This move aimed to enable the government to manage the money supply more flexibly and combat deflation.The cancellation of Gold Clauses led to significant legal battles. Creditors argued that the government’s actions violated the Constitution, specifically the Contracts Clause, which prohibits states from impairing the obligation of contracts. However, the Supreme Court upheld the government's decision, asserting that the economic emergency justified the nullification of these clauses. This ruling set a precedent regarding the limits of governmental power in times of crisis.In contemporary times, the Gold Clause is largely seen as a relic of the past. The United States abandoned the gold standard in 1971, and the dollar is now a fiat currency, meaning it is not backed by a physical commodity. However, discussions about the Gold Clause continue among economists and financial historians. Some argue that reintroducing such clauses could provide a hedge against inflation, while others believe it would complicate the financial system further.Additionally, the Gold Clause raises important questions about the nature of money and value. In a world where currency can be printed at will, the idea of tying contracts to a specific commodity can seem outdated. Yet, the historical context of the Gold Clause serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in monetary policy and the protection of individual rights in economic transactions.In conclusion, the Gold Clause is a fascinating aspect of economic history that illustrates the tension between government intervention and contractual freedom. While it may not hold practical relevance today, understanding its implications provides valuable insights into the evolution of monetary systems and the ongoing debates surrounding economic stability. As we navigate through modern financial challenges, reflecting on concepts like the Gold Clause can enrich our understanding of how economic principles have developed over time and influence current policies.
“金条款”这一概念在美国经济历史中发挥了重要作用。“金条款”是指合同中允许以黄金或其等值支付的条款。这一条款在19世纪末和20世纪初尤为普遍,当时金本位制是主导的货币体系。“金条款”的设计旨在保护债权人免受通货膨胀和货币贬值的影响,确保支付在时间上保持其价值。历史上,“金条款”在大萧条期间变得更加突出。许多合同包含这些条款以保护贷方和投资者的利益。然而,随着经济危机的加深,美国政府寻求通过放弃金本位制来稳定经济。1933年,富兰克林·D·罗斯福总统发布了一项行政命令,实际上使所有私人合同中的“金条款”无效。这一举措旨在使政府能够更灵活地管理货币供应,以应对通货紧缩。“金条款”的取消导致了重大的法律争斗。债权人辩称,政府的行为违反了宪法,特别是合同条款,该条款禁止各州削弱合同的义务。然而,最高法院支持政府的决定,声称经济紧急情况证明了这些条款的无效化是合理的。这一裁决确立了在危机时期政府权力限制的先例。在当代,“金条款”在很大程度上被视为过去的遗物。美国在1971年放弃了金本位制,美元现在是一种法定货币,意味着它不再由实物商品支持。然而,经济学家和金融历史学家仍然在讨论“金条款”。一些人认为,重新引入此类条款可以为通货膨胀提供对冲,而另一些人则认为这会进一步复杂化金融体系。此外,“金条款”提出了关于货币和价值本质的重要问题。在一个可以随意印刷货币的世界里,将合同与特定商品挂钩的想法似乎显得过时。然而,“金条款”的历史背景提醒我们,货币政策的复杂性以及在经济交易中保护个人权利的重要性。总之,“金条款”是经济历史中一个引人入胜的方面,展示了政府干预与合同自由之间的紧张关系。尽管今天可能没有实际相关性,但理解其含义为我们提供了对货币体系演变及当前政策影响的有价值见解。当我们在现代金融挑战中航行时,反思“金条款”等概念可以丰富我们对经济原则如何随时间发展并影响当前政策的理解。
相关单词