frequency of amendment

简明释义

修正频率

英英释义

例句

1.The legal team is concerned about the frequency of amendment in the contract terms.

法律团队对合同条款的修订频率表示担忧。

2.A high frequency of amendment can indicate instability in the organization.

高修订频率可能表明组织的不稳定性。

3.Monitoring the frequency of amendment helps us stay compliant with regulations.

监测修订频率有助于我们保持合规。

4.During the meeting, we discussed the frequency of amendment required for our project guidelines.

在会议中，我们讨论了项目指南所需的修订频率。

5.The company has noticed a high frequency of amendment in its policy documents, reflecting the need for adaptability.

公司注意到其政策文件的修订频率很高，这反映了适应性需求。

作文

In the realm of governance and law, the concept of the frequency of amendment plays a crucial role in shaping the effectiveness and adaptability of legal frameworks. The frequency of amendment refers to how often changes or revisions are made to laws, regulations, or constitutions. A high frequency of amendment can indicate a dynamic legal environment that responds swiftly to societal changes, while a low frequency of amendment might suggest stability but could also lead to outdated laws that fail to address current needs.One of the primary reasons for the frequency of amendment is the need to adapt to evolving societal values and norms. For instance, as societies progress, issues such as human rights, technology, and environmental concerns become more prominent. Laws that were once deemed sufficient may no longer serve the public interest, necessitating amendments. A notable example is the amendment of laws related to marriage equality, which have seen a significant increase in frequency of amendment in various countries over recent years. This reflects a shift in societal attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights and the recognition of equal treatment under the law.Moreover, the frequency of amendment can also be influenced by political factors. In democratic systems, elected officials may push for amendments that align with their platforms or respond to their constituents' demands. This political responsiveness can lead to a higher frequency of amendment, allowing for laws that better reflect the will of the people. Conversely, in more authoritarian regimes, the frequency of amendment may be low, as changes are often made unilaterally and without public input, potentially leading to a disconnect between the law and the populace's needs.However, a high frequency of amendment is not without its challenges. Frequent changes in the law can create confusion and uncertainty among citizens and businesses alike. If laws are amended too often, it can become difficult for individuals to understand their rights and responsibilities. This complexity can hinder compliance and lead to a lack of trust in the legal system. Therefore, while adaptability is essential, there must also be a balance to ensure that the frequency of amendment does not compromise the clarity and stability of the law.In conclusion, the frequency of amendment is a vital aspect of any legal system, reflecting its ability to adapt to changing circumstances. It serves as a barometer for societal progress and political responsiveness. However, as with any aspect of governance, it is crucial to strike a balance between necessary change and the stability that allows citizens to navigate their legal obligations confidently. Understanding the frequency of amendment helps us appreciate the complexities of lawmaking and the ongoing dialogue between society and its governing bodies.

在治理和法律的领域中，修正频率这一概念在塑造法律框架的有效性和适应性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。修正频率指的是对法律、法规或宪法进行更改或修订的频率。高的修正频率可能表明一个动态的法律环境能够迅速响应社会变化，而低的修正频率可能暗示稳定，但也可能导致过时的法律无法满足当前需求。修正频率的主要原因之一是需要适应不断发展的社会价值观和规范。例如，随着社会的进步，人权、技术和环境问题等议题变得愈发突出。曾经被认为足够的法律可能不再符合公众利益，从而需要修订。一个显著的例子是与婚姻平等相关的法律修订，这些法律在近年来在多个国家的修正频率上有了显著增加。这反映了社会对LGBTQ+权利态度的转变以及对法律下平等待遇的认可。此外，修正频率也可能受到政治因素的影响。在民主制度中，民选官员可能会推动与其平台一致或回应其选民需求的修正。这种政治响应性可以导致更高的修正频率，使法律更好地反映人民的意愿。相反，在更专制的政权中，修正频率可能较低，因为变更往往是单方面进行的，且没有公众参与，可能导致法律与民众需求之间的脱节。然而，高的修正频率并非没有挑战。法律的频繁变更可能会在公民和企业之间造成混乱和不确定性。如果法律修改过于频繁，个人可能难以理解自己的权利和责任。这种复杂性可能阻碍合规并导致对法律系统的信任缺失。因此，虽然适应性至关重要，但必须保持平衡，以确保修正频率不会妨碍法律的清晰性和稳定性。总之，修正频率是任何法律系统的重要方面，反映了其适应变化情况的能力。它作为社会进步和政治响应性的晴雨表。然而，正如治理的任何方面一样，必须在必要的变化与允许公民自信地导航法律义务的稳定性之间取得平衡。理解修正频率帮助我们欣赏立法的复杂性以及社会与其治理机构之间持续的对话。