alarmism
简明释义
英[/əˈlɑːrmɪzəm/]美[/əˈlɑːrmɪzəm/]
n. 危言耸听；大惊小怪
英英释义
Alarmism refers to the tendency to exaggerate or promote fear about a particular issue, often related to environmental, health, or safety concerns. | 警报主义指的是夸大或传播对某一特定问题的恐惧倾向，通常与环境、健康或安全问题相关。 |
单词用法
同义词
反义词
| 自满 | His complacency about the environmental issues is concerning. | 他对环境问题的自满让人担忧。 | |
| 冷漠 | The indifference of the public to climate change is alarming. | 公众对气候变化的冷漠令人震惊。 |
例句
1.Some scientists claim that sceptics about global warming get frozen out of the process. Some accuse it of alarmism.
有些科学家声称对于全球变暖的怀疑已经烟消云散，而有些科学家则指责气候委员会是危言耸听。
2.This is not alarmism . After entry into the WTO, No one knows how many enterprises will not be able to survive in the competition.
这不是危言耸听，在加入世界贸易组织大家庭后，会有多少企业败下阵来确实无法估计。
3.Some scientists claim that sceptics about global warming get frozen out of the process. Some accuse it of alarmism.
一些科学家称对全球变暖的怀疑早已坐了冷板凳，一些科学家称IPCC危言耸听。
4.This is absolutely not alarmism. In fact, we believe that it is really a cruel reality.
这可不是危言耸听，事实就是这么残酷。
5.Or maybe I'm just contributing to the blaring non-issue alarmism here.
或许我现在也在制造一些无中生有的噪音罢了。
这种危言耸听的话人们很熟悉了。
7.Such alarmism may be misplaced.
这种危言耸听也许放错地方了。
8.But he cautions against alarmism.
但他也反对危言耸听。
9.In discussions about health risks, alarmism (危言耸听) can lead to overreactions and misinformation.
在讨论健康风险时，alarmism（危言耸听）可能导致过度反应和错误信息。
10.The media's portrayal of climate change often leans towards alarmism (危言耸听), which can cause unnecessary panic among the public.
媒体对气候变化的描述往往倾向于alarmism（危言耸听），这可能导致公众的不必要恐慌。
11.Critics of the report claimed it was based on alarmism (危言耸听) rather than solid evidence.
该报告的批评者声称它是基于alarmism（危言耸听）而非坚实的证据。
12.His speech was filled with alarmism (危言耸听) regarding the economic downturn, making it hard to discern the real issues.
他的演讲充满了关于经济衰退的alarmism（危言耸听），使人很难辨别真正的问题。
13.Some scientists argue that alarmism (危言耸听) about natural disasters can lead to ineffective policy responses.
一些科学家认为，关于自然灾害的alarmism（危言耸听）可能导致无效的政策反应。
作文
In today's fast-paced world, we are constantly bombarded with information about various global issues, from climate change to health pandemics. While it is crucial to stay informed, there is a fine line between raising awareness and falling into the trap of alarmism (夸大其词的警报主义). Alarmism refers to the tendency to exaggerate potential dangers or threats, often leading to unnecessary panic and anxiety among the public. This phenomenon can be observed in media coverage, political discourse, and even in everyday conversations.One of the most prominent examples of alarmism can be seen in discussions surrounding climate change. While the scientific consensus indicates that climate change poses a significant threat to our planet, some media outlets and activists may present information in a way that instills fear rather than encouraging constructive action. For instance, headlines that proclaim "we only have ten years to save the planet" can create a sense of urgency that may lead to despair rather than motivation. This kind of alarmism can alienate individuals who might otherwise engage with the issue, causing them to feel overwhelmed and powerless.Moreover, alarmism can also be detrimental in the context of public health. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, some reports exaggerated the severity of the virus, leading to widespread fear and panic buying. While it is essential to communicate the seriousness of a health crisis, alarmism can result in irrational behavior, such as hoarding essential supplies or avoiding necessary medical care due to fear. This not only affects individual well-being but also puts additional strain on healthcare systems.The impact of alarmism extends beyond immediate reactions; it can also shape long-term attitudes towards critical issues. When people are consistently exposed to exaggerated claims, they may become desensitized to real threats. For instance, if every environmental issue is portrayed as an impending apocalypse, individuals may eventually dismiss warnings altogether, believing that all claims are exaggerated. This skepticism can hinder collective efforts to address genuine problems, as trust in science and expert opinions diminishes.To combat alarmism, it is vital for both media and individuals to approach information critically. Media outlets should strive for balanced reporting that presents facts without sensationalism. This includes providing context and acknowledging uncertainties while still conveying the importance of taking action. On an individual level, we must cultivate a habit of seeking reliable sources and engaging in constructive dialogue rather than succumbing to fear-driven narratives.In conclusion, while it is essential to recognize and address genuine threats, we must be cautious of the pitfalls of alarmism (夸大其词的警报主义). By promoting informed discussions and responsible reporting, we can foster a more rational understanding of the challenges we face, empowering individuals to take meaningful action without succumbing to fear. In a world filled with uncertainty, finding this balance is crucial for both personal well-being and collective progress.
