discriminative protection

简明释义

选择性保

英英释义

例句

1.Many organizations implement discriminative protection measures to comply with data privacy regulations.

许多组织实施区分性保护措施以遵守数据隐私法规。

2.With discriminative protection, companies can prevent unauthorized access to their intellectual property.

通过区分性保护，公司可以防止未授权访问其知识产权。

3.The new software provides discriminative protection to sensitive data, ensuring that only authorized users can access it.

新软件提供区分性保护以保护敏感数据，确保只有授权用户可以访问。

4.The bank's system uses discriminative protection to differentiate between regular transactions and suspicious activities.

银行的系统使用区分性保护来区分常规交易和可疑活动。

5.In the context of cybersecurity, discriminative protection helps in identifying and mitigating potential threats.

在网络安全的背景下，区分性保护有助于识别和减轻潜在威胁。

作文

In today's society, the concept of justice and fairness is more important than ever. However, there are instances where certain groups or individuals receive preferential treatment over others, leading to the notion of discriminative protection (歧视性保护). This term refers to policies or practices that favor one group while disadvantaging another, often based on characteristics such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status. While the intention behind such protections may be to promote equality, they can sometimes lead to further division and resentment among different groups.One example of discriminative protection is affirmative action in educational institutions. These policies are designed to increase the representation of historically marginalized groups, such as racial minorities and women, in colleges and universities. While this approach aims to rectify past injustices and create a more diverse learning environment, it can also result in qualified candidates from non-targeted groups feeling overlooked or disadvantaged. This creates a complex situation where the very measures intended to foster inclusivity may inadvertently perpetuate feelings of inequality.Similarly, in the workplace, discriminative protection can manifest through hiring practices that prioritize candidates from specific backgrounds over others. Employers may implement diversity quotas to ensure a balanced workforce, but this can lead to perceptions of unfairness among those who feel they are being judged solely on their demographic characteristics rather than their qualifications. As a result, the morale of employees who do not fit into the favored categories may decline, leading to a toxic work environment.Moreover, discriminative protection can also appear in legal contexts, where certain laws are enacted to protect specific groups. For instance, hate crime legislation often aims to provide additional penalties for crimes motivated by bias against particular groups. While this is a necessary measure to deter discrimination, it raises questions about whether all victims of crime receive equal protection under the law. If certain groups are seen as more deserving of protection, it can foster animosity and a sense of injustice among those who feel excluded from these special considerations.The challenge with discriminative protection lies in finding a balance between acknowledging historical injustices and ensuring that all individuals are treated fairly. It is essential to create systems that promote equity without fostering divisions. One potential solution is to focus on socioeconomic factors rather than solely on race or gender. By addressing the root causes of inequality, such as poverty and lack of access to education, we can create a more inclusive society that uplifts everyone.In conclusion, while discriminative protection (歧视性保护) may arise from noble intentions to promote fairness and equality, it can lead to unintended consequences that further divide society. It is crucial to approach these issues thoughtfully and strive for solutions that genuinely benefit all individuals, regardless of their background. Only by doing so can we hope to achieve a truly just and equitable society.

在当今社会，正义和公平的概念比以往任何时候都更为重要。然而，有些情况下，某些群体或个人获得了优待，而其他人却受到不利对待，这导致了“discriminative protection”（歧视性保护）这一概念的出现。这个术语指的是那些偏向某一群体而使另一群体处于不利地位的政策或做法，通常基于种族、性别或社会经济地位等特征。虽然这些保护措施的初衷可能是为了促进平等，但有时也会导致不同群体之间进一步的分裂和怨恨。“discriminative protection”的一个例子是教育机构中的平权行动。这些政策旨在增加历史上被边缘化群体（如种族少数群体和女性）在大学和学院中的代表性。虽然这种方法旨在纠正过去的不公并创造一个更具多样性的学习环境，但它也可能导致非目标群体的合格候选人感到被忽视或处于不利地位。这造成了一个复杂的情况，即那些本意在促进包容性的措施可能无意中延续了不平等的感觉。同样，在职场中，“discriminative protection”可能通过优先考虑特定背景候选人的招聘实践表现出来。雇主可能会实施多样性配额，以确保劳动力的平衡，但这可能导致那些感到仅仅根据其人口特征而被评判的人的不公平感。因此，不符合受青睐类别的员工的士气可能会下降，从而导致有毒的工作环境。此外，“discriminative protection”在法律背景中也可能出现，其中某些法律被制定以保护特定群体。例如，仇恨犯罪立法通常旨在对因偏见而动机的犯罪施加额外的惩罚。虽然这是遏制歧视的必要措施，但这引发了关于所有犯罪受害者是否在法律下获得平等保护的问题。如果某些群体被视为更值得保护，这可能会在那些感到被排除在这些特殊考虑之外的人中滋生敌意和不公感。“discriminative protection”的挑战在于找到承认历史不公与确保所有个体公平对待之间的平衡。创建促进公平而不助长分裂的系统至关重要。一种潜在的解决方案是关注社会经济因素，而不仅仅是种族或性别。通过解决不平等的根本原因，如贫困和缺乏教育机会，我们可以创造一个更具包容性的社会，提升每个人。总之，虽然“discriminative protection”（歧视性保护）可能源于促进公平和平等的崇高意图，但它可能导致意想不到的后果，进一步分裂社会。我们必须认真对待这些问题，并努力寻求真正惠及所有个体的解决方案，无论他们的背景如何。只有这样，我们才能希望实现一个真正公正和平等的社会。