delay exclusion

简明释义

不负因延期所造成损失的责任

英英释义

例句

1.The committee decided to delay exclusion of the new policy until further review.

委员会决定延迟排除新政策，直到进一步审查。

2.Due to unforeseen circumstances, the judge chose to delay exclusion of evidence until the next hearing.

由于不可预见的情况，法官选择延迟排除证据，直到下次听证会。

3.The management decided to delay exclusion of the employee until an investigation was complete.

管理层决定延迟排除该员工，直到调查完成。

4.The team agreed to delay exclusion of certain features in the software update for better user feedback.

团队同意延迟排除软件更新中的某些功能，以获得更好的用户反馈。

5.In order to gather more data, we will delay exclusion of some participants from the study.

为了收集更多数据，我们将延迟排除一些参与者。

作文

In the realm of education and social policy, the term delay exclusion refers to a strategy aimed at postponing the removal of a student from a school environment due to behavioral issues or academic struggles. This approach is grounded in the belief that with the right support and intervention, students can improve their behavior and academic performance, thus allowing them to remain in a nurturing educational setting. The concept of delay exclusion has gained traction in recent years as educators and policymakers recognize the long-term negative impacts of exclusionary practices on students' futures.One of the primary reasons for implementing delay exclusion is to provide students with opportunities for growth and development. When a student faces disciplinary action that could lead to exclusion, it often stems from underlying issues such as trauma, learning disabilities, or lack of support at home. By delaying the exclusion process, schools can offer targeted interventions, such as counseling, tutoring, or behavioral support, tailored to the individual needs of the student. This proactive approach not only helps address the root causes of the problem but also fosters a sense of belonging and community within the school.Moreover, delay exclusion aligns with restorative justice principles, which emphasize repairing harm and restoring relationships rather than simply punishing wrongdoing. Instead of expelling a student for misbehavior, schools can engage in dialogues that encourage accountability and understanding. This method not only aids the offending student in recognizing the impact of their actions but also reinforces positive behavior among peers. By focusing on restoration rather than punishment, schools can create a more inclusive and supportive environment.Critics of delay exclusion may argue that it allows disruptive behavior to continue unchecked, potentially affecting the learning environment for other students. However, it is essential to distinguish between appropriate interventions and a lack of discipline. Educators must strike a balance between maintaining order in the classroom and providing support to those who need it most. This requires training for teachers and staff on effective classroom management techniques and understanding the complexities of student behavior.Furthermore, the success of delay exclusion relies heavily on collaboration among parents, teachers, and mental health professionals. When all parties work together, they can develop comprehensive plans that address the specific needs of the student while ensuring the safety and well-being of the entire school community. Regular communication and feedback loops are crucial in monitoring the progress of the interventions and making necessary adjustments along the way.Ultimately, the goal of delay exclusion is to empower students to succeed academically and socially. By providing the necessary resources and support, schools can help students navigate their challenges and emerge as resilient individuals. This approach not only benefits the students directly involved but also contributes to a healthier school culture overall. As we move forward, it is imperative that we continue to explore and implement strategies like delay exclusion that prioritize the well-being and success of every student, ensuring that no one is left behind.In conclusion, the concept of delay exclusion represents a shift in how we view discipline and support in educational settings. By delaying the exclusion of students and focusing on intervention and support, we can create an environment that fosters growth, accountability, and inclusion. It is a necessary step towards building a more equitable education system that recognizes the diverse needs of all students and works collaboratively to meet those needs.

在教育和社会政策领域，术语延迟排除指的是一种策略，旨在因行为问题或学业困难而推迟将学生从学校环境中移除。这种方法基于一个信念：通过适当的支持和干预，学生可以改善他们的行为和学业表现，从而使他们能够留在一个充满关爱的教育环境中。近年来，随着教育工作者和政策制定者认识到排斥性做法对学生未来的长期负面影响，延迟排除的概念逐渐受到重视。实施延迟排除的主要原因之一是为学生提供成长和发展的机会。当学生面临可能导致排除的纪律处分时，通常源于一些潜在问题，如创伤、学习障碍或家庭支持不足。通过推迟排除过程，学校可以提供有针对性的干预措施，如咨询、辅导或行为支持，量身定制以满足学生的个体需求。这种积极的方法不仅有助于解决问题的根本原因，还促进了学生在学校内的归属感和社区意识。此外，延迟排除与恢复性司法原则相一致，这些原则强调修复伤害和恢复关系，而不仅仅是惩罚错误。学校可以通过鼓励责任感和理解的对话，而不是将学生开除来处理不当行为。这种方法不仅帮助违规学生认识到自己行为的影响，还增强了同龄人之间的积极行为。通过关注恢复而非惩罚，学校可以创造一个更具包容性和支持性的环境。延迟排除的批评者可能会认为，它允许破坏性行为继续存在，从而可能影响其他学生的学习环境。然而，重要的是要区分适当的干预措施与缺乏纪律。教育工作者必须在维持课堂秩序和为最需要帮助的学生提供支持之间找到平衡。这需要对教师和工作人员进行有效课堂管理技巧的培训，并了解学生行为的复杂性。此外，延迟排除的成功在很大程度上依赖于家长、教师和心理健康专业人员之间的合作。当所有各方共同努力时，他们可以制定全面的计划，既满足学生的具体需求，又确保整个学校社区的安全和福祉。定期的沟通和反馈循环对于监测干预措施的进展和必要时进行调整至关重要。最终，延迟排除的目标是赋予学生在学业和社交方面取得成功的能力。通过提供必要的资源和支持，学校可以帮助学生应对挑战，成为坚韧不拔的个体。这种方法不仅直接惠及相关学生，也有助于整体健康的学校文化。随着我们向前发展，继续探索和实施像延迟排除这样的策略是至关重要的，这些策略优先考虑每个学生的福祉和成功，确保没有人被落下。总之，延迟排除的概念代表了我们对教育环境中纪律和支持的看法的转变。通过推迟学生的排除并专注于干预和支持，我们可以创造一个促进成长、责任和包容的环境。这是建立一个更公平的教育体系所必需的一步，该体系承认所有学生的多样化需求，并共同努力满足这些需求。