defiance of law

简明释义

藐视法律

英英释义

例句

1.The company operated without a license, showing a clear defiance of law.

该公司在没有许可证的情况下运营，显示出明显的无视法律。

2.Her refusal to pay taxes was a blatant defiance of law that could lead to severe penalties.

她拒绝交税是对法律的公然藐视，可能会导致严厉的惩罚。

3.The protestors marched in the streets in defiance of law, demanding justice for their cause.

抗议者在街头游行，无视法律，要求为他们的事业争取正义。

4.His actions were seen as an act of defiance of law, leading to his arrest.

他的行为被视为对法律的藐视，导致了他的逮捕。

5.In defiance of law, the group continued to gather despite the ban on large gatherings.

该团体继续聚集，无视法律，尽管禁止大型聚会。

作文

In modern society, the concept of law is fundamental to maintaining order and ensuring justice. However, there are instances where individuals or groups engage in actions that can be described as defiance of law. This term refers to the act of openly resisting or refusing to obey established legal rules and regulations. Such behavior raises significant questions about the nature of justice, authority, and individual rights. In this essay, I will explore the implications of defiance of law and its impact on society.One of the most notable examples of defiance of law can be seen in civil disobedience movements throughout history. Figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. advocated for nonviolent resistance against unjust laws. Their actions were not merely acts of rebellion; they were deliberate challenges to the moral legitimacy of certain laws. For instance, Gandhi's refusal to comply with British salt taxes was a strategic move aimed at highlighting the oppressive nature of colonial rule. Similarly, King's protests against racial segregation laws were grounded in the belief that these laws were fundamentally unjust. In both cases, defiance of law served as a powerful catalyst for social change, prompting society to reconsider and ultimately reform its legal framework.However, defiance of law is not always rooted in noble intentions. There are instances where individuals engage in illegal activities purely for personal gain or out of a disregard for the well-being of others. For example, organized crime syndicates often operate under a blatant defiance of law, engaging in drug trafficking, human trafficking, and other illicit activities. Such actions not only undermine the rule of law but also pose significant threats to public safety and societal stability. The challenge lies in distinguishing between justified defiance and criminal behavior, as both can have far-reaching consequences.Moreover, the rise of technology and social media has transformed the landscape of defiance of law. Activists can now mobilize support and organize protests more efficiently than ever before. While this can lead to positive change, it also raises concerns about the potential for misinformation and the spread of extremist views. The ability to rally large groups of people quickly can result in chaotic situations where the law is openly challenged, sometimes leading to violence and unrest. As such, the relationship between technology and defiance of law complicates the traditional understanding of lawful protest and civil disobedience.In conclusion, defiance of law plays a complex role in society. It can serve as a means of challenging unjust laws and advocating for social justice, as seen in historical movements led by figures like Gandhi and King. However, it can also manifest in harmful ways that threaten public safety and undermine the rule of law. As we navigate the challenges of modern governance, it is crucial to foster a dialogue about the boundaries of lawful protest and the responsibilities that come with exercising one's rights. Ultimately, understanding the nuances of defiance of law will help us create a more just and equitable society for all.

在现代社会，法律的概念对于维护秩序和确保正义至关重要。然而，有些个人或团体会采取可以被描述为对法律的蔑视的行为。这个术语指的是公开抵抗或拒绝遵守既定法律规则和法规的行为。这种行为引发了关于正义、权威和个人权利本质的重大问题。在本文中，我将探讨对法律的蔑视的含义及其对社会的影响。对法律的蔑视的一个最显著的例子可以在历史上的公民不服从运动中看到。甘地和马丁·路德·金等人物倡导非暴力抵抗不公正法律。他们的行为不仅仅是反叛的行为；它们是对某些法律道德合法性的有意识挑战。例如，甘地拒绝服从英国盐税是一种战略举动，旨在突出殖民统治的压迫性。本质上，金对种族隔离法律的抗议根植于这些法律根本不公的信念。在这两种情况下，对法律的蔑视作为一种强大的催化剂，促使社会重新考虑并最终改革其法律框架。然而，对法律的蔑视并不总是根植于高尚的意图。有些情况下，个人出于个人利益或对他人福祉的漠视而参与非法活动。例如，组织犯罪集团通常在明显的对法律的蔑视下运作，参与毒品贩运、人口贩卖和其他非法活动。这种行为不仅破坏了法治，还对公众安全和社会稳定构成了重大威胁。挑战在于区分合理的蔑视和犯罪行为，因为两者都可能产生深远的后果。此外，科技和社交媒体的崛起改变了对法律的蔑视的格局。活动家现在可以比以往任何时候更有效地动员支持和组织抗议。虽然这可以导致积极的变化，但也引发了对虚假信息传播和极端主义观点扩散的担忧。迅速召集大量人群的能力可能导致混乱局面，在这种情况下，法律被公开挑战，有时会导致暴力和动乱。因此，科技与对法律的蔑视之间的关系复杂化了对合法抗议和公民不服从的传统理解。总之，对法律的蔑视在社会中扮演着复杂的角色。它可以作为挑战不公正法律和倡导社会正义的一种手段，如甘地和金等历史人物所见。然而，它也可能以有害的方式表现出来，威胁公共安全并破坏法治。在我们应对现代治理的挑战时，促进关于合法抗议界限和行使权利所需责任的对话至关重要。最终，理解对法律的蔑视的细微差别将帮助我们为所有人创造一个更加公正和平等的社会。