deadweight efficiency

简明释义

载重排水量比率

英英释义

例句

1.The logistics team analyzed the deadweight efficiency of their delivery routes to minimize fuel consumption.

物流团队分析了他们配送路线的无效效率以最小化燃料消耗。

2.Investors are interested in the deadweight efficiency of the new project before committing funds.

投资者在投入资金之前对新项目的无效效率感兴趣。

3.The company improved its operations to achieve better deadweight efficiency, reducing unnecessary costs.

公司改善了运营，以实现更好的无效效率，降低不必要的成本。

4.The audit revealed several areas where deadweight efficiency could be improved.

审计揭示了多个可以改善无效效率的领域。

5.By enhancing deadweight efficiency, the organization was able to allocate resources more effectively.

通过提高无效效率，组织能够更有效地分配资源。

作文

In the realm of economics, the concept of deadweight efficiency plays a crucial role in understanding market dynamics and resource allocation. This term refers to the loss of economic efficiency that occurs when the equilibrium for a good or service is not achieved or is not achievable. Essentially, it represents the cost to society created by market inefficiency, which prevents optimal distribution of resources. To grasp the implications of deadweight efficiency, we must first explore its underlying principles and consequences.When a market operates under conditions of perfect competition, resources are allocated efficiently, and consumer and producer surplus is maximized. However, various factors such as taxes, subsidies, monopolies, and price controls can distort this equilibrium. For instance, when a tax is imposed on a product, it increases the price for consumers while reducing the effective price received by producers. This discrepancy leads to a decrease in the quantity sold, resulting in a loss of welfare that is represented by the deadweight efficiency. In simpler terms, it signifies the transactions that do not occur due to the intervention, which could have otherwise benefited both consumers and producers.Moreover, deadweight efficiency is not merely an abstract concept; it has real-world implications. For example, consider a government imposing a high tax on sugary drinks to discourage consumption for health reasons. While the intention may be noble, the unintended consequence could be a significant reduction in sales, leading to lower revenue for producers and potentially higher prices for consumers. The lost transactions represent a deadweight loss, indicating that the market is not functioning at its full potential. This scenario highlights the delicate balance policymakers must strike between regulating markets for public good and allowing them to operate efficiently.Furthermore, understanding deadweight efficiency is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of various economic policies. Policymakers often aim to maximize social welfare, but if their interventions lead to significant deadweight losses, the overall benefits may be undermined. For instance, subsidies for certain industries might seem beneficial at first glance, but they can create market distortions that result in inefficiencies. In such cases, the challenge lies in designing policies that minimize deadweight losses while achieving desired social outcomes.The concept of deadweight efficiency also extends beyond traditional markets. In public goods, where consumption is non-excludable and non-rivalrous, the free-rider problem can lead to under-provision of essential services. This situation creates inefficiencies that result in deadweight losses, as resources are not allocated to their most valued uses. Addressing these inefficiencies requires innovative solutions, such as government intervention or community-based initiatives, to ensure that public goods are adequately provided without incurring excessive deadweight losses.In conclusion, deadweight efficiency is a vital concept in economics that sheds light on the importance of market equilibrium and the consequences of deviations from it. By understanding the factors that contribute to deadweight losses, policymakers and economists can better navigate the complexities of resource allocation and strive for a more efficient economy. Ultimately, recognizing the significance of deadweight efficiency enables us to appreciate the intricate balance between regulation and market freedom, leading to improved outcomes for society as a whole.

在经济学领域，死重效率的概念在理解市场动态和资源配置中发挥着至关重要的作用。这个术语指的是当某种商品或服务的均衡未实现或无法实现时所发生的经济效率损失。本质上，它代表了因市场低效而给社会造成的成本，这种低效阻碍了资源的最佳分配。要掌握死重效率的含义，我们必须首先探讨其基本原则和后果。当市场在完全竞争的条件下运作时，资源得以高效配置，消费者和生产者的剩余最大化。然而，各种因素如税收、补贴、垄断和价格管制可能会扭曲这一均衡。例如，当对某种产品征税时，它会提高消费者的价格，同时降低生产者实际收到的价格。这种差异导致销售数量减少，从而造成福利损失，这种损失由死重效率表示。简单来说，它意味着由于干预而未能发生的交易，而这些交易本可以使消费者和生产者双方受益。此外，死重效率不仅仅是一个抽象的概念；它具有现实世界的影响。例如，考虑政府对含糖饮料征收高额税收，以出于健康原因抑制消费。虽然这种意图可能是高尚的，但意想不到的后果可能是销售量显著减少，导致生产者收入下降，消费者价格可能上涨。丧失的交易代表了死重损失，表明市场未能充分发挥其潜力。这种情况突显了政策制定者在为公共利益进行市场监管和允许市场高效运作之间必须保持微妙平衡的挑战。此外，理解死重效率对于评估各种经济政策的有效性至关重要。政策制定者通常旨在最大化社会福利，但如果他们的干预导致显著的死重损失，则整体收益可能会受到削弱。例如，对某些行业的补贴乍一看似乎是有利的，但它们可能会造成市场扭曲，从而导致低效。在这种情况下，挑战在于设计能够在实现期望的社会结果的同时，最小化死重损失的政策。死重效率的概念还超越了传统市场。在公共物品中，消费是非排他性和非竞争性的，自由骑乘者问题可能导致基本服务的供应不足。这种情况创造了低效，导致死重损失，因为资源未被分配到其最有价值的用途。解决这些低效需要创新的解决方案，例如政府干预或基于社区的倡议，以确保公共物品得到适当提供，而不会产生过多的死重损失。总之，死重效率是经济学中的一个重要概念，它揭示了市场均衡的重要性以及偏离均衡的后果。通过理解导致死重损失的因素，政策制定者和经济学家可以更好地应对资源配置的复杂性，努力实现更高效的经济。最终，认识到死重效率的重要性使我们能够欣赏监管与市场自由之间的微妙平衡，从而为整个社会带来更好的结果。