deadweight efficiency

简明释义

载重量排水量比

英英释义

例句

1.By analyzing the deadweight efficiency metrics, the company identified areas for improvement.

通过分析死重效率指标，公司识别出改进的领域。

2.Higher deadweight efficiency means that a ship can carry more cargo without increasing its weight.

更高的死重效率意味着一艘船可以在不增加自身重量的情况下运载更多货物。

3.In shipping, maximizing deadweight efficiency helps reduce costs and increase profitability.

在航运中，最大化死重效率有助于降低成本并提高盈利能力。

4.The logistics company improved its deadweight efficiency by optimizing its cargo loading process.

这家物流公司通过优化货物装载流程提高了其死重效率。

5.The engineering team focused on enhancing the deadweight efficiency of the new vessel design.

工程团队专注于提升新船设计的死重效率。

作文

In the realm of economics, the term deadweight efficiency refers to a situation where resources are not being utilized in the most effective manner, leading to a loss of economic welfare. This concept is crucial for understanding market failures and the implications of taxation, subsidies, and monopolistic practices. When we talk about deadweight efficiency (无谓效率), we are essentially discussing the inefficiencies that arise when supply and demand are not in equilibrium. For instance, consider a perfectly competitive market where goods are sold at a price that reflects their true value to consumers. In this ideal scenario, all resources are allocated efficiently; however, when a tax is imposed on a good, it creates a wedge between what consumers are willing to pay and what producers receive. This leads to a decrease in the quantity of the good sold, creating a loss in total welfare known as deadweight loss. The concept of deadweight efficiency is particularly relevant in discussions about government intervention in markets. While taxes are often necessary for funding public services, they can also lead to inefficiencies. The more significant the tax, the greater the deadweight loss, as fewer transactions occur, and the market moves further away from equilibrium. This highlights the delicate balance policymakers must strike between generating revenue and minimizing economic distortions. Moreover, monopolies present another scenario where deadweight efficiency becomes evident. A monopolist has the power to set prices above the competitive level, which reduces the quantity sold compared to a competitive market. This results in a loss of consumer surplus and overall welfare, as some consumers who would have purchased the product at a lower price are now priced out of the market. The inefficiency created by monopolistic pricing can be quantified as a deadweight loss, illustrating the importance of competition in achieving deadweight efficiency (无谓效率). Additionally, subsidies can also lead to deadweight efficiency. While they may aim to encourage consumption or production of certain goods, they can distort market signals and lead to overproduction or overconsumption. This again results in a misallocation of resources and a loss of economic welfare. For example, if the government subsidizes corn production, farmers may produce more corn than the market demands, leading to an oversupply and a subsequent drop in prices. This can cause other crops to be neglected, resulting in a less diverse agricultural system and ultimately a loss in overall efficiency. In conclusion, understanding deadweight efficiency (无谓效率) is vital for economists, policymakers, and business leaders alike. It serves as a reminder of the potential pitfalls of market interventions and the importance of striving for equilibrium in supply and demand. By recognizing the factors that lead to deadweight loss, societies can work towards creating more efficient markets, ultimately enhancing economic welfare for all participants. As we navigate the complexities of modern economies, the lessons drawn from the concept of deadweight efficiency remain ever relevant, guiding us towards better economic decisions and policies that foster growth and prosperity.

在经济学领域，术语无谓效率指的是资源未能以最有效的方式利用，从而导致经济福利的损失。这一概念对于理解市场失灵以及税收、补贴和垄断行为的影响至关重要。当我们谈论无谓效率时，我们实际上是在讨论当供需不平衡时所产生的低效。 例如，考虑一个完全竞争的市场，在这个市场中，商品以反映其对消费者真实价值的价格出售。在这个理想情境中，所有资源都得到了有效配置；然而，当对某种商品征税时，就会在消费者愿意支付的价格与生产者获得的价格之间产生差距。这导致商品销售数量减少，造成一种称为死weight loss的总福利损失。 无谓效率的概念在讨论政府对市场干预时尤为相关。虽然税收通常是为公共服务提供资金所必需的，但它们也可能导致低效。税收越大，死weight loss就越大，因为交易减少，市场远离均衡。这突显了政策制定者在产生收入和最小化经济扭曲之间必须取得的微妙平衡。 此外，垄断也展示了无谓效率的另一种情景。垄断者有能力将价格设定在竞争水平之上，这减少了与竞争市场相比的销售数量。这导致消费者剩余和整体福利的损失，因为一些本可以以较低价格购买产品的消费者现在被排除在市场之外。垄断定价所造成的低效可以量化为死weight loss，说明了竞争在实现无谓效率中的重要性。 此外，补贴也可能导致无谓效率。虽然它们旨在鼓励某些商品的消费或生产，但它们可能扭曲市场信号并导致过度生产或过度消费。这再次导致资源的错误配置和经济福利的损失。例如，如果政府对玉米生产提供补贴，农民可能会生产超过市场需求的玉米，导致过剩和价格下降。这可能导致其他作物被忽视，导致农业系统的多样性降低，最终导致整体效率的损失。 总之，理解无谓效率对于经济学家、政策制定者和商业领袖来说至关重要。它提醒我们市场干预的潜在陷阱以及追求供需均衡的重要性。通过认识导致死weight loss的因素，社会可以努力创造更高效的市场，最终增强所有参与者的经济福利。当我们在现代经济的复杂性中航行时，从无谓效率概念中汲取的教训仍然具有现实意义，引导我们做出更好的经济决策和政策，促进增长和繁荣。