de jure = by right

简明释义

法律上的

英英释义

例句

1.The treaty granted de jure = by right independence to the colonies.

该条约赋予了殖民地法定独立 = 正当理由。

2.The country is a democracy, but the president holds power de jure = by right rather than de facto = in practice.

这个国家是一个民主国家，但总统的权力是法理上 = 正当理由而非事实上的 = 实际情况。

3.While he was not the leader de facto = in practice, he was considered de jure = by right the rightful successor.

虽然他并不是实际的领导者，但他被认为是法理上 = 正当理由的合法继任者。

4.The law states that all citizens have de jure = by right access to education.

法律规定所有公民有权利获得教育，法理上 = 正当理由。

5.She is the de jure = by right heir to the throne, despite the ongoing disputes over her legitimacy.

尽管关于她合法性存在争议，她仍然是王位的法定继承人 = 正当理由。

作文

The concept of governance and authority has always been a topic of great debate and discussion. In many societies, there exists a distinction between what is considered de jure and what is de facto. The term de jure = by right refers to something that is established by law or in accordance with legal principles. For instance, a government may be recognized as the legitimate authority through constitutional provisions, making its power de jure = by right. This means that the government has the legal right to rule, regardless of whether it is effectively exercising that power in practice.On the other hand, de facto refers to situations that exist in reality, even if they are not legally recognized. For example, a regime might hold power without the legal backing that legitimizes its authority. In such cases, citizens may question the legitimacy of the government, leading to unrest and calls for reform. This disparity between de jure and de facto can create tension within a society, as people grapple with the difference between what is legally sanctioned and what is practically occurring.In the context of civil rights, the distinction between de jure = by right and de facto discrimination becomes particularly relevant. While laws may exist that guarantee equal rights for all citizens, the reality may be different. For instance, racial segregation was upheld by law in many parts of the United States until the Civil Rights Movement challenged these de jure = by right statutes. Activists fought not only against the laws themselves but also against the societal norms that perpetuated inequality, demonstrating that legal rights do not always translate into actual rights experienced by individuals.The importance of recognizing the difference between de jure = by right and de facto situations cannot be overstated. It allows us to critically analyze our legal systems and the efficacy of laws in promoting justice and equality. When laws are created, they should reflect the values of society and work towards the betterment of all individuals. However, if there is a gap between what is legal and what is practiced, it becomes essential for citizens to advocate for change.In conclusion, understanding the implications of de jure = by right versus de facto realities is crucial for any society striving for justice and equality. Laws must not only exist on paper but should also be enforced and respected in practice. As we continue to navigate complex social issues, it is imperative that we hold our leaders accountable and ensure that the rights guaranteed by law are genuinely accessible to all. Only then can we move towards a more equitable society where the principles of de jure = by right are upheld in both legislation and lived experience.

治理和权威的概念一直是一个备受争议和讨论的话题。在许多社会中，合法性（de jure）和事实上的情况（de facto）之间存在着一种区别。术语de jure = by right指的是通过法律或根据法律原则确立的事物。例如，一个政府可能通过宪法条款被认可为合法的权威，从而使其权力成为de jure = by right。这意味着该政府有合法的统治权，无论它是否有效地行使这种权力。另一方面，de facto指的是即使没有法律承认，实际存在的情况。例如，一个政权可能在没有法律支持的情况下掌握权力。在这种情况下，公民可能会质疑政府的合法性，从而导致社会动荡和改革呼声。这种de jure = by right与de facto之间的差异可能会在社会中造成紧张，因为人们在合法性与实际发生之间进行挣扎。在公民权利的背景下，de jure = by right和de facto歧视之间的区别显得尤为重要。虽然法律可能存在，保障所有公民的平等权利，但现实情况可能不同。例如，在美国的许多地方，种族隔离曾由法律维持，直到民权运动挑战了这些de jure = by right法规。活动家不仅反对这些法律本身，还反对那些延续不平等的社会规范，表明法律权利并不总是转化为个体所体验的实际权利。认识到de jure = by right与de facto情况之间的区别的重要性不容小觑。它使我们能够批判性地分析我们的法律系统及其在促进正义和平等方面的有效性。当法律被制定时，它们应该反映社会的价值观，并努力改善所有个体的状况。然而，如果法律与实践之间存在差距，公民就必须倡导变革。总之，理解de jure = by right与de facto现实的含义对于任何追求正义和平等的社会都是至关重要的。法律不仅必须存在于纸面上，还应在实践中得到执行和尊重。随着我们继续应对复杂的社会问题，确保我们的领导者负责并确保法律保障的权利真正对所有人可及是至关重要的。只有这样，我们才能朝着一个更加公平的社会迈进，在这个社会中，de jure = by right的原则在立法和生活经历中得到维护。