cut-off governing

简明释义

截汽调节

英英释义

例句

1.Due to the cut-off governing rules, applications submitted after the deadline were not considered.

由于切断管理规则，截止日期后提交的申请未被考虑。

2.The new policy introduced a cut-off governing age for senior discounts, which is now set at 65 years.

新政策引入了一个切断管理的年龄标准，老年折扣现在设定在65岁。

3.The cut-off governing limits in the competition ensured that only the top ten participants would move forward.

比赛中的切断管理限制确保只有前十名参与者可以继续比赛。

4.The university has a cut-off governing score for admissions that applicants must meet to be considered.

大学有一个切断管理的录取分数，申请者必须达到该分数才能被考虑。

5.In financial audits, there are cut-off governing procedures to ensure all transactions are recorded in the correct period.

在财务审计中，有切断管理程序以确保所有交易记录在正确的期间内。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the concept of cut-off governing has gained significant attention. This term refers to a form of governance where certain criteria or thresholds are established to determine eligibility for participation in various systems or processes. For instance, in educational settings, students may face cut-off governing when applying for universities, where only those who meet specific academic standards are considered for admission. This practice can be both beneficial and detrimental, depending on how it is implemented. On one hand, cut-off governing can ensure that only qualified individuals gain access to opportunities, thereby maintaining a certain level of quality and competence within institutions. On the other hand, it can also create barriers for deserving candidates who may not meet arbitrary thresholds despite their potential.The implications of cut-off governing extend beyond education into various sectors, including employment and public services. In job recruitment, companies often set cut-off scores for assessments, which can lead to the exclusion of talented candidates who might excel in practical scenarios but do not perform well on standardized tests. This raises questions about the fairness and effectiveness of such practices. Are we truly identifying the best candidates, or are we merely filtering out those who do not fit a predefined mold?Moreover, cut-off governing can exacerbate social inequalities. Individuals from underprivileged backgrounds may lack access to resources that help them meet these cut-offs, perpetuating cycles of disadvantage. For instance, in many countries, children from lower-income families may not receive the same quality of education as their wealthier peers, affecting their chances of meeting academic cut-offs for higher education. This highlights the need for a more holistic approach to governance that considers the diverse backgrounds and circumstances of individuals.To address the challenges posed by cut-off governing, policymakers must strive for inclusivity. Instead of rigid thresholds, a more flexible system that evaluates candidates based on a combination of factors, including personal experiences and potential, could lead to better outcomes. For example, universities might consider alternative admissions criteria such as interviews, portfolios, or community service, allowing for a broader assessment of a candidate's capabilities.In conclusion, while cut-off governing serves a purpose in streamlining processes and ensuring quality, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and the potential for exclusion. A balanced approach that combines traditional cut-offs with more comprehensive evaluation methods can foster a more equitable environment, enabling individuals from all walks of life to thrive. As we navigate the complexities of governance in modern society, it is imperative to remain vigilant about the implications of our choices and to prioritize fairness and accessibility in all systems of governance.

在当今快节奏的世界中，cut-off governing的概念引起了广泛关注。这个术语指的是一种治理形式，其中设定了特定的标准或阈值，以确定参与各种系统或过程的资格。例如，在教育环境中，学生在申请大学时可能会面临cut-off governing，只有那些符合特定学术标准的学生才会被考虑录取。这种做法可以是有益的，也可能是有害的，具体取决于其实施方式。一方面，cut-off governing可以确保只有合格的人获得机会，从而在机构内保持一定的质量和能力水平。另一方面，它也可能为有潜力但未能达到任意阈值的候选人设置障碍。cut-off governing的影响超越了教育，延伸到各个领域，包括就业和公共服务。在招聘中，公司通常会为评估设定及格分数，这可能导致有才华的候选人被排除在外，他们在实际场景中可能表现出色，但在标准化测试中表现不佳。这引发了关于这种做法的公平性和有效性的质疑。我们真的在识别最佳候选人，还是仅仅在过滤那些不符合预定义模式的人？此外，cut-off governing可能加剧社会不平等。来自弱势背景的个人可能缺乏帮助他们达到这些阈值的资源，从而延续了劣势循环。例如，在许多国家，来自低收入家庭的儿童可能没有接受与富裕同龄人相同质量的教育，这影响了他们满足高等教育学术标准的机会。这突显了需要采取更全面的治理方法，以考虑个人的多样背景和情况。为了应对cut-off governing带来的挑战，政策制定者必须努力实现包容性。与其设定严格的阈值，不如采用一种更灵活的系统，根据多个因素评估候选人，包括个人经历和潜力，这可能会导致更好的结果。例如，大学可以考虑替代的录取标准，如面试、作品集或社区服务，从而允许对候选人能力的更广泛评估。总之，虽然cut-off governing在简化流程和确保质量方面发挥着作用，但至关重要的是要认识到其局限性和排斥的潜力。结合传统的及格线与更全面的评估方法的平衡方法，可以促进一个更加公平的环境，使各行各业的人都能蓬勃发展。在我们应对现代社会治理的复杂性时，必须对我们选择的影响保持警惕，并优先考虑所有治理系统中的公平性和可及性。