cross motion

简明释义

横向运动

英英释义

例句

1.The judge granted the cross motion for a protective order to safeguard sensitive information.

法官批准了反向动议，以保护敏感信息。

2.The defendant filed a cross motion to dismiss the case, claiming lack of jurisdiction.

被告提交了一个反向动议以驳回案件，声称缺乏管辖权。

3.In response to the plaintiff's request, the lawyer submitted a cross motion for summary judgment.

作为对原告请求的回应，律师提交了一个反向动议以寻求简易判决。

4.The cross motion for a temporary restraining order was filed to prevent further actions.

为了防止进一步的行动，提交了反向动议以申请临时限制令。

5.During the hearing, the attorney argued that the cross motion was necessary to address new evidence.

在听证会上，律师辩称该反向动议是必要的，以处理新证据。

作文

In the realm of law, the term cross motion refers to a legal request made by one party in response to a motion filed by another party. This concept is crucial in understanding how legal proceedings unfold and how parties can interact with each other within the judicial system. A cross motion essentially allows a defendant or respondent to present their own arguments and requests simultaneously while addressing the claims made against them. For instance, consider a scenario in which a plaintiff files a motion for summary judgment, asserting that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that they are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In response, the defendant may file a cross motion for summary judgment as well, arguing that the evidence supports their position and that the plaintiff's claims should be dismissed. This not only streamlines the process but also ensures that both parties have an opportunity to present their case. The strategic use of a cross motion can significantly impact the outcome of a case. By filing such a motion, a party can potentially shift the focus of the court’s attention and highlight their own strengths while undermining the opposing party's arguments. It serves as a tactical maneuver that demonstrates the complexity of legal battles where multiple issues may be at play. Moreover, understanding the procedural aspects of a cross motion is vital for attorneys and their clients. It requires careful consideration of the rules governing motions in the relevant jurisdiction, including deadlines and formatting requirements. Failure to adhere to these rules can result in a motion being denied or dismissed, which could adversely affect a party's case. Additionally, the implications of a cross motion extend beyond mere procedural tactics; they also influence the overall strategy employed by legal teams. For example, if a party anticipates that their opponent will file a motion, they might prepare a cross motion in advance to preemptively counter the arguments that will be presented. This proactive approach can help establish a stronger position in the eyes of the court. Furthermore, the outcome of a cross motion can lead to a resolution of the case without the need for a full trial. If the court finds merit in the cross motion, it may grant the motion and rule in favor of the responding party, thereby avoiding the time and expense associated with further litigation. This highlights the importance of effective legal representation and the necessity of crafting compelling arguments. In conclusion, the term cross motion encapsulates a fundamental aspect of legal practice that allows parties to engage with each other's claims actively. It embodies the dynamic nature of legal proceedings, where responsiveness and strategy play critical roles. As individuals navigate the complexities of the legal system, understanding the function and significance of a cross motion becomes essential for achieving favorable outcomes. Legal professionals must remain vigilant and adept at utilizing such motions to advocate effectively for their clients, ensuring that all voices are heard within the courtroom. The concept of a cross motion is not just a procedural formality; it represents a powerful tool for justice, enabling parties to contest allegations and assert their rights in a structured and formal manner.

在法律领域中，术语cross motion指的是一方对另一方提出的动议作出的法律请求。这个概念对于理解法律程序如何展开以及各方如何在司法系统内相互作用至关重要。cross motion本质上允许被告或回应方在处理针对他们的指控时，同时提出自己的论据和请求。例如，考虑这样一个场景：原告提出了一个简易判决动议，主张没有真实的实质性事实争议，并且他们有权根据法律获得判决。作为回应，被告也可以提出一个cross motion要求简易判决，辩称证据支持他们的立场，原告的指控应当被驳回。这不仅简化了程序，还确保双方都有机会陈述自己的案件。战略性地使用cross motion可以显著影响案件的结果。通过提出这样的动议，一方可以潜在地转移法庭的关注重点，强调自己的优势，同时削弱对方的论据。这是一种战术性手段，展示了法律斗争的复杂性，其中可能涉及多个问题。此外，理解cross motion的程序性方面对于律师及其客户至关重要。这需要仔细考虑相关管辖区内有关动议的规则，包括截止日期和格式要求。不遵守这些规则可能导致动议被拒绝或驳回，这可能对一方的案件产生不利影响。此外，cross motion的含义不仅限于程序战术；它们还影响法律团队采用的整体战略。例如，如果一方预见到对方将提出动议，他们可能提前准备一个cross motion以预先反驳将要提出的论据。这种主动的方法可以帮助在法庭面前建立更强的位置。此外，cross motion的结果可以导致案件在无需全面审判的情况下得到解决。如果法院发现cross motion有理，可能会批准该动议并裁定支持回应方，从而避免进一步诉讼所需的时间和费用。这突显了有效法律代表的重要性，以及制定有说服力论据的必要性。总之，术语cross motion概括了法律实践的一个基本方面，使各方能够积极参与彼此的主张。它体现了法律程序的动态特性，在这里，响应性和策略发挥着关键作用。当个人在法律体系的复杂性中航行时，理解cross motion的功能和重要性对实现有利结果变得至关重要。法律专业人士必须保持警惕，并善于利用此类动议，以有效地为客户辩护，确保在法庭上听到所有声音。cross motion的概念不仅仅是程序形式；它代表了一种强大的正义工具，使各方能够在结构化和正式的方式中对指控进行抗辩并主张自己的权利。