conclusive evidence

简明释义

决定性证据

英英释义

例句

1.Without conclusive evidence, the case could not proceed to trial.

没有确凿证据，案件无法进入审判阶段。

2.The investigation yielded conclusive evidence linking the suspect to the crime scene.

调查得到了确凿证据，将嫌疑人与犯罪现场联系起来。

3.The researchers found conclusive evidence that climate change is accelerating.

研究人员发现了确凿证据，表明气候变化正在加速。

4.The jury needed conclusive evidence to reach a verdict.

陪审团需要确凿证据才能作出裁决。

5.The scientist presented conclusive evidence that the new drug was effective in treating the disease.

科学家提供了确凿证据，证明这种新药在治疗该疾病方面有效。

作文

In the realm of scientific research, the term conclusive evidence refers to information or data that decisively supports a particular hypothesis or theory. This kind of evidence is critical because it eliminates the possibility of doubt or alternative explanations. For instance, when scientists conduct experiments, they aim to gather conclusive evidence that can affirm their predictions and validate their findings. Without such evidence, theories remain speculative and unproven.One of the most significant examples of conclusive evidence in history is the discovery of the structure of DNA. In the early 1950s, James Watson and Francis Crick proposed a double-helix model of DNA based on various pieces of existing data. However, it was the X-ray diffraction images taken by Rosalind Franklin that provided the conclusive evidence needed to confirm their model. This breakthrough not only changed the course of genetics but also demonstrated how essential conclusive evidence is in establishing scientific truths.In legal contexts, conclusive evidence plays a similar role. It is the type of evidence that is so compelling that it leaves no room for reasonable doubt regarding a defendant's guilt or innocence. For example, if a fingerprint found at a crime scene matches that of a suspect, this could be considered conclusive evidence of their presence at the scene. The strength of such evidence can significantly influence the outcome of a trial, highlighting its importance in the justice system.However, the pursuit of conclusive evidence is not without challenges. In many fields, particularly in social sciences and humanities, obtaining definitive proof can be elusive. Researchers often deal with complex variables that do not lend themselves easily to clear-cut conclusions. This complexity necessitates a careful interpretation of data, as well as an understanding that sometimes, what may appear as conclusive evidence could be subject to further scrutiny and debate.Moreover, the reliance on conclusive evidence can lead to a form of intellectual rigidity. When researchers or practitioners become overly fixated on obtaining absolute proof, they may overlook valuable insights that come from more ambiguous or nuanced data. Therefore, while conclusive evidence is vital for establishing facts and truths, it is equally important to remain open to new interpretations and understandings that may emerge over time.In conclusion, conclusive evidence serves as a cornerstone in both scientific inquiry and legal proceedings. Its ability to provide definitive support for claims makes it invaluable in the quest for knowledge and justice. Nonetheless, it is crucial to maintain a balanced perspective, recognizing that while conclusive evidence is essential, the world is often more complex than simple binaries of proof and disproof. Embracing this complexity can lead to richer understanding and more robust conclusions across various fields of study.

在科学研究领域，术语conclusive evidence指的是能够决定性地支持特定假设或理论的信息或数据。这种证据至关重要，因为它消除了怀疑或替代解释的可能性。例如，当科学家进行实验时，他们旨在收集能够确认其预测并验证其发现的conclusive evidence。没有这样的证据，理论将保持在推测和未证明的状态。历史上最重要的conclusive evidence之一是DNA结构的发现。在20世纪50年代初，詹姆斯·沃森和弗朗西斯·克里克基于现有数据提出了双螺旋的DNA模型。然而，罗莎琳德·富兰克林拍摄的X射线衍射图像提供了确认他们模型所需的conclusive evidence。这一突破不仅改变了遗传学的进程，还展示了conclusive evidence在建立科学真理中的重要性。在法律背景中，conclusive evidence同样发挥着类似的作用。这是一种如此令人信服的证据，以至于对于被告的有罪或无罪几乎没有合理怀疑。例如，如果在犯罪现场发现的指纹与嫌疑人的指纹匹配，这可以被视为他们出现在现场的conclusive evidence。这种证据的强度可以显著影响审判的结果，突显了其在司法系统中的重要性。然而，追求conclusive evidence并非没有挑战。在许多领域，特别是社会科学和人文学科，获得决定性证据可能是难以捉摸的。研究人员通常处理复杂变量，这些变量不容易得出明确的结论。这种复杂性需要对数据进行仔细的解释，以及理解有时看似conclusive evidence的东西可能会受到进一步审查和辩论。此外，过于依赖conclusive evidence可能导致一种知识上的僵化。当研究人员或从业者过于专注于获得绝对证据时，他们可能会忽视来自更模糊或微妙的数据的有价值见解。因此，尽管conclusive evidence对于建立事实和真理至关重要，但同样重要的是保持开放的心态，承认有时世界比简单的证据和反证的二元对立要复杂得多。接受这种复杂性可以导致更丰富的理解和更稳健的结论，适用于各个研究领域。总之，conclusive evidence作为科学探究和法律程序的基石，其为主张提供明确支持的能力使其在追求知识和正义的过程中不可或缺。然而，保持平衡的视角也至关重要，认识到虽然conclusive evidence是必要的，但世界往往比简单的证据和反证的二元对立要复杂得多。