remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce

简明释义

实物报酬

英英释义

例句

1.In some rural communities, workers are often compensated with remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce instead of cash, especially during harvest season.

在一些农村社区，工人们通常以实物报酬; 以农产品支付的方式获得补偿，尤其是在收获季节。

2.During the barter market, many people exchanged goods for remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce rather than using cash.

在以物易物市场上，许多人交换商品以获得实物报酬; 以农产品支付，而不是使用现金。

3.Some agricultural workers prefer remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce as it provides them with fresh food and reduces their living costs.

一些农业工人更喜欢实物报酬; 以农产品支付，因为这为他们提供了新鲜的食物，并减少了生活成本。

4.Many farmers prefer to receive their remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce because it allows them to sustain their families with food directly from their labor.

许多农民更喜欢以实物报酬; 以农产品支付的方式获得报酬，因为这可以让他们用直接来自劳动的食物养活自己的家庭。

5.The local cooperative decided to offer remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce to its members to support sustainable farming practices.

当地合作社决定向其成员提供实物报酬; 以农产品支付的方式，以支持可持续农业实践。

作文

In many agricultural communities around the world, the concept of remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce plays a significant role in the local economy. This term refers to a system where workers or service providers are compensated not with cash, but with goods, particularly agricultural products. For instance, a farmer may hire laborers to help during the harvest season and instead of paying them in money, he might offer them a share of the crops collected. This practice has deep roots in history and continues to be relevant in various cultures today.The advantages of remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce are manifold. Firstly, it strengthens community ties. When farmers pay their workers with produce, it fosters a sense of belonging and mutual support. The workers, who receive food directly from their labor, often feel more connected to the land and the community. This creates a cycle of dependency that can be quite beneficial for both parties involved.Secondly, this method of compensation can be economically advantageous. In regions where cash flow is limited, farmers might find it easier to give away a portion of their yield rather than parting with cash they may not have. This is particularly true during harvest seasons when the produce is abundant but cash reserves are low. Thus, remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce allows farmers to manage their resources more effectively while still ensuring that workers are compensated fairly for their efforts.Furthermore, receiving payment in the form of food can help workers meet their immediate needs. In rural areas where access to fresh produce may be limited, being paid in farm produce can significantly enhance the quality of life for laborers. They can either consume the food themselves or trade it for other necessities, thus creating a barter system that sustains the local economy.However, there are challenges associated with remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce. One major concern is the valuation of the produce. Determining how much a worker should receive in terms of harvested goods can be complex, especially when crop yields vary year by year. Additionally, if the produce does not meet the quality or quantity expected, it can lead to dissatisfaction among workers.Moreover, this system may not work as well in urban settings, where cash transactions are the norm. As societies evolve and move towards more industrialized economies, the reliance on remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce diminishes. Workers in cities typically expect monetary compensation, which can create a disconnect between agricultural practices and modern economic systems.In conclusion, while remuneration in kind; paid in farm produce remains a vital part of agricultural economies, its effectiveness depends on various factors including community structure, economic conditions, and cultural practices. Understanding this system provides valuable insights into how agricultural societies function and adapt in an ever-changing world. As we look to the future, it is essential to consider how such traditional practices can coexist with modern economic models, ensuring that both farmers and workers can thrive together.

在世界许多农业社区中，实物报酬；以农产品支付的概念在当地经济中发挥着重要作用。这个术语指的是一种系统，其中工人或服务提供者不是用现金而是用商品，特别是农业产品进行补偿。例如，农民可能雇佣劳工在收获季节提供帮助，而不是用钱支付他们，农民可能会给他们一部分收集到的作物。这种做法在历史上有着深厚的根基，并且在今天的各种文化中仍然具有相关性。实物报酬；以农产品支付的优势是多方面的。首先，它增强了社区的联系。当农民用农产品支付工人时，这促进了归属感和相互支持的感觉。工人们直接从他们的劳动中获得食物，往往会感到与土地和社区更加紧密相连。这创造了一种相互依赖的循环，这对双方都是相当有利的。其次，这种补偿方式在经济上也可能是有利的。在现金流有限的地区，农民可能发现给予一部分收成比支付他们可能没有的现金更容易。这在收获季节尤其真实，因为此时农产品丰盈，但现金储备却较低。因此，实物报酬；以农产品支付使农民能够更有效地管理资源，同时确保工人能够公平地获得他们努力工作的报酬。此外，以食物作为支付的方式可以帮助工人满足他们的即时需求。在新鲜农产品获取可能有限的农村地区，以农产品支付的工人可以显著改善他们的生活质量。他们可以自己消费这些食物，或者将其交换其他必需品，从而创造出一个支持地方经济的物物交换系统。然而，实物报酬；以农产品支付也面临挑战。其中一个主要问题是对农产品的估值。确定工人应获得多少收获的商品可能很复杂，尤其是在作物产量每年都不同的情况下。此外，如果所提供的农产品未达到预期的质量或数量，可能会导致工人的不满。此外，在城市环境中，这一系统可能效果不佳，现金交易是常态。随着社会的发展，向更工业化的经济转变，对实物报酬；以农产品支付的依赖减少。城市中的工人通常期望获得货币补偿，这可能会造成农业实践与现代经济体系之间的脱节。总之，虽然实物报酬；以农产品支付仍然是农业经济的重要组成部分，但其有效性取决于包括社区结构、经济条件和文化实践在内的各种因素。理解这一制度为我们提供了宝贵的见解，帮助我们了解农业社会如何在不断变化的世界中运作和适应。展望未来，有必要考虑传统做法如何与现代经济模式共存，以确保农民和工人能够共同繁荣。