doomster
简明释义
n. 预言灾难的人;审判者;宣判人
英英释义
A person who predicts or believes in an impending disaster or catastrophe, often with a pessimistic outlook. | 一个预测或相信即将到来的灾难或劫难的人,通常持有悲观的观点。 |
单词用法
末日主义心态 | |
末日主义预测 | |
末日主义展望 | |
末日主义修辞 |
同义词
反义词
乐观主义者 | She is an optimist who believes everything will turn out fine. | 她是一个乐观主义者,相信一切都会好起来。 | |
充满希望的 | Despite the challenges, he remains hopeful about the future. | 尽管面临挑战,他对未来仍然充满希望。 |
例句
1.And alarmist politicians and doomster academics may, in pointing to the state of decay, miss a nation's continuing strengths and attractions, which have to be weighed against its problems and worries.
而杞人忧天的政客和末日论的学者们则可能在指出衰减状态的同时也遗漏了国家持续的国力和吸引力,这些都应该与面临的问题和担忧受到同等重视。
2.And alarmist politicians and doomster academics may, in pointing to the state of decay, miss a nation's continuing strengths and attractions, which have to be weighed against its problems and worries.
而杞人忧天的政客和末日论的学者们则可能在指出衰减状态的同时也遗漏了国家持续的国力和吸引力,这些都应该与面临的问题和担忧受到同等重视。
3.While some see potential in the new policy, others are doomsters 悲观者 who fear it will lead to disaster.
虽然一些人看到新政策的潜力,但另一些人是doomsters 悲观者,他们担心这会导致灾难。
4.The economic forecast was filled with doomsters 悲观者 who believed a recession was imminent.
经济预测中充满了doomsters 悲观者,他们认为衰退即将来临。
5.In discussions about climate change, the doomsters 悲观者 often dominate the conversation with their dire predictions.
在关于气候变化的讨论中,doomsters 悲观者常常以其严峻的预测主导谈话。
6.The movie was criticized for being too much of a doomster 悲观者 film, painting a hopeless picture of the future.
这部电影因过于悲观而受到批评,描绘了一个无望的未来。
7.Despite the ongoing improvements in technology, some doomsters 悲观者 still predict a bleak future for humanity.
尽管技术不断进步,一些doomsters 悲观者仍然预测人类的未来将是黯淡的。
作文
In recent years, the term doomster has emerged as a descriptor for individuals who have a pessimistic outlook on the future, particularly regarding environmental issues and societal progress. These people often believe that humanity is on a path to inevitable disaster, whether it be through climate change, political instability, or economic collapse. While some may argue that a certain level of skepticism is healthy, the doomster mentality can lead to a sense of hopelessness and inaction among the general populace.The rise of social media has amplified the voices of doomsters, allowing their messages of despair to reach wider audiences. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook are filled with dire predictions about the future, often backed by alarming statistics and scientific reports. While it is important to acknowledge the seriousness of issues like global warming and resource depletion, the relentless negativity propagated by doomsters can overshadow potential solutions and innovations.One of the most significant impacts of the doomster attitude is its ability to stifle motivation and creativity. When individuals are constantly bombarded with messages of doom, they may feel paralyzed and unable to take action. This is particularly concerning in the context of environmental activism, where hope and collective effort are essential for driving change. Instead of inspiring people to engage in sustainable practices, the doomster narrative can lead to apathy and resignation.However, it is crucial to differentiate between constructive criticism and the defeatist perspective of a doomster. Many scientists and activists highlight the urgent need for change, but they do so with a focus on actionable solutions rather than solely emphasizing the negative aspects. For instance, movements advocating for renewable energy and conservation efforts aim to empower individuals and communities to make a difference, countering the narrative pushed by doomsters.Moreover, the portrayal of doomsters in popular culture often exacerbates the problem. Movies, books, and documentaries frequently depict dystopian futures, reinforcing the idea that disaster is not only possible but likely. This genre can be entertaining and thought-provoking, yet it often fails to present a balanced view that includes hope and resilience. As consumers of media, we must remain critical of the narratives we consume and seek out stories that highlight human ingenuity and the capacity for positive change.In conclusion, while the concerns raised by doomsters are valid and deserve attention, it is essential to approach these issues with a balanced perspective. Acknowledging the challenges we face is important, but it should be paired with a commitment to finding solutions and fostering a sense of agency among individuals. By shifting the conversation away from a purely negative outlook and towards a more hopeful and proactive stance, we can inspire action and create a better future for ourselves and generations to come. The fight against despair is not just about combating the doomster mentality; it is about embracing optimism and resilience in the face of adversity.
近年来,术语doomster已成为描述那些对未来持悲观态度的个体,尤其是关于环境问题和社会进步的人。这些人常常认为人类正走向不可避免的灾难,无论是气候变化、政治不稳定还是经济崩溃。虽然有人可能会争辩说,适度的怀疑是健康的,但doomster心态可能导致公众普遍感到绝望和无所作为。社交媒体的崛起放大了doomster的声音,使他们的绝望信息能够传播到更广泛的受众。像Twitter和Facebook这样的平台充斥着关于未来的可怕预测,通常以令人震惊的统计数据和科学报告为支持。虽然承认全球变暖和资源枯竭等问题的严重性很重要,但doomster所传播的无休止的负面情绪可能掩盖潜在的解决方案和创新。doomster态度最显著的影响之一是它能够抑制动机和创造力。当个人不断受到厄运信息的轰炸时,他们可能会感到瘫痪,无能为力。这在环境行动主义的背景下尤为令人担忧,因为希望和集体努力对于推动变革至关重要。与其激励人们参与可持续实践,不如说doomster叙事可能导致冷漠和放弃。然而,区分建设性的批评和doomster的失败主义观点至关重要。许多科学家和活动家强调迫切需要改变,但他们关注的是可采取的解决方案,而不仅仅是强调消极方面。例如,倡导可再生能源和保护努力的运动旨在赋予个人和社区改变的能力,以此反击doomster所推动的叙事。此外,流行文化中对doomster的描绘往往加剧了这一问题。电影、书籍和纪录片经常描绘反乌托邦的未来,强化了灾难不仅可能而且可能发生的观念。这种类型的作品可以是娱乐性和发人深省的,但它往往未能呈现出包括希望和韧性的平衡视角。作为媒体的消费者,我们必须对我们消费的叙事保持批判,并寻找突显人类聪明才智和积极变化能力的故事。总之,尽管doomster提出的担忧是有效的,值得关注,但以平衡的视角看待这些问题至关重要。承认我们面临的挑战很重要,但这应与对寻找解决方案和培养个人代理感的承诺相结合。通过将谈话从纯粹的消极前景转向更加充满希望和积极主动的立场,我们可以激励行动,为自己和未来几代人创造更好的未来。与绝望的斗争不仅仅是对抗doomster心态;而是要在逆境中拥抱乐观和韧性。