by pass governing

简明释义

旁通调节

英英释义

例句

1.The software was designed to by pass governing security measures in order to gain unauthorized access.

该软件旨在规避管理安全措施以获得未经授权的访问。

2.During the meeting, the team discussed ways to by pass governing protocols that were slowing down their project.

在会议期间，团队讨论了如何规避管理正在拖慢他们项目的协议。

3.Some individuals believe that they can by pass governing laws when it comes to tax evasion.

一些人认为在逃税方面他们可以规避管理法律。

4.In certain situations, companies may try to by pass governing regulations to expedite their processes.

在某些情况下，公司可能会尝试规避管理规定以加快其流程。

5.They found a loophole to by pass governing standards set by the industry.

他们找到了一个漏洞来规避管理行业设定的标准。

作文

In today's rapidly changing world, the concept of governance has evolved significantly. Traditional methods of governing often face challenges that can hinder progress and innovation. As a result, many individuals and organizations are seeking ways to by pass governing in order to achieve their goals more efficiently. This term refers to the act of circumventing established rules or regulations in order to pursue alternative paths that may be more effective or timely. While this approach can lead to immediate benefits, it also raises important ethical and legal questions.One of the primary reasons people choose to by pass governing is the frustration with bureaucratic processes. In many cases, government regulations can be slow and cumbersome, preventing individuals and businesses from acting quickly in response to new opportunities or challenges. For example, a startup might find itself bogged down by lengthy approval processes for permits or licenses, which could stifle innovation and growth. By finding ways to by pass governing, these startups can capitalize on their ideas and bring them to market faster, potentially gaining a competitive edge.However, the decision to by pass governing is not without its risks. When individuals or organizations choose to ignore or circumvent regulations, they may face legal repercussions or damage their reputations. Moreover, such actions can undermine the very principles of accountability and transparency that governance seeks to uphold. For instance, if a company decides to by pass governing environmental regulations to cut costs, it may lead to environmental degradation and public backlash, ultimately harming its long-term viability.Additionally, the consequences of by pass governing are not always immediately apparent. While some may achieve short-term gains, the long-term effects can be detrimental to society as a whole. When governance structures are bypassed, it can create a sense of inequality and injustice among those who adhere to the rules. This can lead to a breakdown of trust in institutions and a reluctance to engage in civic duties.Therefore, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of by pass governing. Instead of circumventing established systems, individuals and organizations should advocate for reform and improvement of governance structures. Engaging in dialogue with policymakers and stakeholders can lead to more efficient processes that benefit everyone, rather than resorting to shortcuts that may have negative consequences.In conclusion, while the idea of by pass governing may seem appealing in certain contexts, it is essential to weigh the potential risks and ethical considerations involved. Striving for innovation and efficiency should not come at the expense of accountability and fairness. By working within the framework of governance and seeking to improve it, we can create a more just and effective system that serves the needs of all members of society. Ultimately, the goal should be to enhance governance rather than evade it, ensuring that progress is made in a responsible and sustainable manner.

在当今快速变化的世界中，治理的概念已经发生了显著的演变。传统的治理方法往往面临挑战，这可能会阻碍进步和创新。因此，许多人和组织正在寻求以更高效的方式绕过治理来实现他们的目标。这个术语指的是为了追求可能更有效或及时的替代路径而绕过既定规则或法规的行为。虽然这种方法可以带来即时的好处，但它也引发了重要的伦理和法律问题。人们选择绕过治理的主要原因之一是对官僚流程的沮丧。在许多情况下，政府法规可能是缓慢而繁琐的，阻止个人和企业迅速应对新的机会或挑战。例如，一家初创公司可能会因为获得许可证或执照的漫长审批过程而陷入困境，这可能会抑制创新和增长。通过寻找方法来绕过治理，这些初创公司可以利用他们的想法并更快地将其推向市场，从而可能获得竞争优势。然而，选择绕过治理的决定并非没有风险。当个人或组织选择忽视或规避法规时，他们可能面临法律后果或损害自己的声誉。此外，这种行为可能会破坏治理所寻求维护的问责制和透明度的基本原则。例如，如果一家公司决定绕过治理环境法规以降低成本，可能会导致环境恶化和公众反弹，最终损害其长期生存能力。此外，绕过治理的后果并不总是立即显现。虽然一些人可能会获得短期利益，但长期影响可能对整个社会造成损害。当治理结构被绕过时，可能会在遵守规则的人群中产生不平等和不公正的感觉。这可能导致对机构的信任崩溃以及对公民责任的抵触。因此，考虑绕过治理的更广泛影响至关重要。与其规避既定系统，个人和组织应该倡导治理结构的改革和改进。与政策制定者和利益相关者进行对话，可以导致更有效的流程，从而使每个人受益，而不是诉诸于可能产生负面后果的捷径。总之，尽管在某些情况下，绕过治理的想法似乎很有吸引力，但必须权衡潜在的风险和涉及的伦理考量。追求创新和效率不应以牺牲问责制和公平为代价。通过在治理框架内工作并寻求改善，我们可以创建一个更公正和有效的系统，以满足社会所有成员的需求。最终，目标应是增强治理，而不是逃避它，确保以负责任和可持续的方式取得进展。