bill in equity
简明释义
平衡法控诉书
英英释义
例句
1.A bill in equity can be used to enforce specific performance in contractual disputes.
在合同争议中,可以使用衡平法诉状来强制履行特定义务。
2.The attorney advised her client to file a bill in equity to prevent the sale of the property.
律师建议她的客户提交一份衡平法诉状以阻止该物业的出售。
3.In this case, the judge ruled in favor of the bill in equity presented by the homeowner.
在这个案件中,法官支持了业主提出的衡平法诉状。
4.The court accepted the bill in equity as it addressed issues of fairness and justice.
法院接受了这份衡平法诉状,因为它涉及公平和正义的问题。
5.The plaintiff filed a bill in equity to seek a remedy for the breach of trust.
原告提交了一份衡平法诉状以寻求对信托违反的救济。
作文
In the realm of law, particularly in common law jurisdictions, the concept of a bill in equity is essential for understanding how justice is administered beyond the rigid confines of statutory law. A bill in equity refers to a formal written application presented to a court seeking equitable relief, which is a remedy that addresses fairness rather than a strict legal right. This legal instrument originated from the Court of Chancery in England, which was established to provide remedies that were not available under the common law system. The primary purpose of a bill in equity is to seek relief in cases where traditional legal remedies, such as monetary damages, are inadequate. For instance, if a party is wrongfully deprived of property and monetary compensation would not suffice to restore their position, they may file a bill in equity to seek specific performance, injunctions, or other forms of equitable relief. One of the most significant aspects of a bill in equity is its ability to address issues of fairness and justice. Unlike common law, which often adheres strictly to legal precedents and statutes, equity allows judges to exercise discretion and consider the unique circumstances of each case. This flexibility is crucial in situations where rigid application of the law would result in unjust outcomes. For example, consider a scenario where a person has entered into a contract to sell a unique piece of art. If the seller later refuses to complete the sale, the buyer may find it difficult to quantify their loss in monetary terms. In this case, a bill in equity could be filed to compel the seller to complete the transaction, as the unique nature of the artwork makes it irreplaceable. Moreover, a bill in equity often includes various forms of relief, such as temporary restraining orders or permanent injunctions. These tools allow courts to prevent parties from taking actions that would cause irreparable harm while the case is being resolved. For instance, if a company is infringing on a patent, the patent holder may file a bill in equity to stop the infringement until the court can determine the validity of the patent. The process of filing a bill in equity typically involves several steps, including drafting the document, serving it to the opposing party, and attending hearings where both parties present their arguments. It is essential for the plaintiff to demonstrate that they have a legitimate claim for equitable relief and that they have acted fairly themselves, as courts will often deny relief to those who come to court with "unclean hands." In conclusion, the concept of a bill in equity plays a vital role in the legal system by ensuring that justice is served in a manner that considers the complexities of human relationships and the nuances of individual cases. By allowing for flexible remedies that focus on fairness, equity serves as a necessary counterbalance to the rigidity of common law, ultimately promoting a more just society. As we continue to navigate legal challenges in an ever-evolving world, the principles underlying a bill in equity remain relevant and critical for achieving equitable outcomes.
在法律领域,特别是在普通法辖区内,“bill in equity”的概念对于理解如何在超越严格的法定法律范围内实施正义至关重要。“bill in equity”是指向法院提出的正式书面申请,寻求公平救济,这是一种关注公平而非严格法律权利的救济措施。该法律文书起源于英格兰的衡平法庭,该法庭成立的目的是提供普通法体系下无法获得的救济。“bill in equity”的主要目的是在传统法律救济(如金钱赔偿)不足以解决问题的情况下寻求救济。例如,如果一方被错误剥夺了财产,而金钱赔偿不足以恢复他们的地位,他们可以提交“bill in equity”以寻求特定履行、禁令或其他形式的公平救济。“bill in equity”的一个重要方面是其能够解决公平和正义的问题。与普通法严格遵循法律先例和法规不同,衡平法允许法官行使裁量权,考虑每个案件的独特情况。这种灵活性在严格适用法律将导致不公正结果的情况下至关重要。例如,考虑一个人签订合同出售一件独特艺术品的情景。如果卖方后来拒绝完成销售,买方可能很难以金钱的方式量化他们的损失。在这种情况下,可以提交“bill in equity”以强制卖方完成交易,因为艺术品的独特性使其不可替代。此外,“bill in equity”通常包括各种形式的救济,如临时限制令或永久禁令。这些工具允许法院在案件解决期间防止各方采取会造成不可弥补伤害的行动。例如,如果一家公司侵犯了专利,专利持有人可以提交“bill in equity”以阻止侵权,直到法院确定专利的有效性。提交“bill in equity”的过程通常涉及几个步骤,包括起草文件、将其送达对方以及参加双方陈述论点的听证会。原告必须证明他们有合法的公平救济请求,并且他们自己也公平行事,因为法院通常会拒绝那些“手上不干净”的人的救济。总之,“bill in equity”的概念在法律体系中发挥着至关重要的作用,通过确保以考虑人际关系复杂性和个案细微差别的方式来实现正义。通过允许灵活的救济措施,关注公平,衡平法作为普通法的必要对立面,最终促进了一个更加公正的社会。随着我们继续在不断发展的世界中应对法律挑战,“bill in equity”背后的原则仍然相关且关键,以实现公平的结果。