refute

简明释义

英[rɪˈfjuːt]美[rɪˈfjuːt]

v. <正式> 驳斥，批驳；<正式> 否认，辩驳

第 三 人 称 单 数 r e f u t e s

现 在 分 词 r e f u t i n g

过 去 式 r e f u t e d

过 去 分 词 r e f u t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.I do not refute their ideas one by one.

我在这里就不一一反驳他们的观点了。

2.Silence is one of the hardest arguments to refute.

沉默是最难反驳的论点之一。

3.It was the kind of rumour that it is impossible to refute.

这是那种不可能推翻的谣言。

4.Yet this study did not necessarily refute Dollo's law.

这项研究并不能充分驳倒道罗法则。

5.Just be sure to refute any unauthorized withdrawals or transactions within the time limit stipulated by your bank.

只要保证能在银行限定的时间内拒绝掉一切未经许可的提款和交易就行。

6.I covered the conference as a reporter, but what really unnerved me was a counter-conference of scholars to refute the earlier one.

我以记者的身份报道了那次会议，但真正让我感到不安的是学者们召开的反驳会议。

7.Isabelle is quick to refute any suggestion of intellectual snobbery.

对于任何暗示她恃才傲物的话，伊莎贝尔都立即予以否认。

8.There is no experience that could either support or refute such a doctrine.

对于这样的一种学说，没有经验可以支持或反对。

9.It comes in and out of fashion and often evokes considerable energy in efforts to support or refute it.

它进出的方式，往往会引起相当大的力量在努力支持或驳斥它。

10.The article aims to refute the misconceptions surrounding climate change.

这篇文章旨在反驳围绕气候变化的误解。

11.The lawyer was able to refute the claims made against his client.

律师能够反驳对他客户提出的指控。

12.Scientists often refute old theories with new research.

科学家们经常用新的研究来反驳旧理论。

13.She provided evidence to refute the rumors about her.

她提供了证据以反驳关于她的谣言。

14.He tried to refute the allegations by presenting his alibi.

他试图通过提供不在场证明来反驳指控。

作文

In today's world, the ability to critically evaluate information is more important than ever. With the rise of social media and the prevalence of misinformation, individuals must learn to discern fact from fiction. One crucial skill in this process is the ability to refute false claims effectively. To refute means to prove that something is wrong or false, and it is a vital part of logical reasoning and debate. For example, consider the ongoing discussions about climate change. Some individuals deny its existence or downplay its severity. Scientists and environmentalists often engage in public debates where they must refute these claims with solid evidence. By presenting data, research findings, and expert opinions, they can successfully refute the arguments made by climate change skeptics. This process not only helps to clarify the truth but also educates the public about the importance of scientific consensus.Moreover, the act of refuting false information is essential in academic writing. When students write research papers, they are often required to address counterarguments. This means they need to acknowledge opposing viewpoints and then refute them with credible sources and logical reasoning. For instance, if a student is writing about the benefits of renewable energy, they might encounter arguments claiming that fossil fuels are more efficient. To strengthen their position, the student would need to refute this argument by providing statistics on the long-term efficiency and sustainability of renewable energy sources compared to fossil fuels.In the realm of politics, the ability to refute misleading statements is equally crucial. Politicians often make claims that are either exaggerated or completely unfounded. Opponents and fact-checkers play a vital role in the political landscape by refuting these claims with factual evidence. For example, during election campaigns, candidates may refute each other's statements to demonstrate their opponent's lack of credibility. This back-and-forth can influence public perception and ultimately affect voting behavior.However, refuting claims is not just about winning an argument; it is also about fostering a culture of truth and accountability. When individuals take the time to refute misinformation, they contribute to a more informed society. This can be seen in various online platforms where users actively challenge false narratives by providing reliable sources and well-reasoned arguments. Such actions promote critical thinking and encourage others to question the validity of the information they encounter.In conclusion, the ability to refute false claims is a fundamental skill in our modern society. Whether in scientific discourse, academic writing, or political debates, refuting misinformation not only clarifies the truth but also strengthens our collective understanding of complex issues. As we navigate an increasingly complex information landscape, let us embrace the responsibility to refute falsehoods and champion the pursuit of knowledge and truth. By doing so, we contribute to a more informed and rational world, equipped to tackle the challenges we face today.

在当今世界，批判性评估信息的能力比以往任何时候都更加重要。随着社交媒体的兴起和虚假信息的普遍存在，个人必须学会辨别事实与虚构。在这个过程中，一个关键的技能是有效地反驳错误的说法。反驳的意思是证明某事是错误或虚假的，这是逻辑推理和辩论的重要部分。例如，考虑气候变化的持续讨论。一些人否认其存在或淡化其严重性。科学家和环保主义者经常参与公众辩论，他们必须用确凿的证据来反驳这些说法。通过提供数据、研究结果和专家意见，他们可以成功地反驳气候变化怀疑者提出的论点。这个过程不仅有助于澄清真相，还教育公众了解科学共识的重要性。此外，反驳虚假信息的行为在学术写作中同样至关重要。当学生撰写研究论文时，他们通常需要处理反对观点。这意味着他们需要承认对立观点，然后用可信的来源和逻辑推理来反驳它们。例如，如果一个学生正在撰写关于可再生能源益处的文章，他们可能会遇到声称化石燃料更有效的论点。为了增强自己的立场，学生需要通过提供可再生能源与化石燃料相比的长期效率和可持续性的统计数据来反驳这一论点。在政治领域，反驳误导性陈述的能力同样至关重要。政治家们经常做出夸大或完全没有根据的声明。对手和事实检查者在政治舞台上发挥着至关重要的作用，通过用事实证据来反驳这些声明。例如，在选举活动期间，候选人可能会相互反驳对方的说法，以展示对手缺乏可信度。这种你来我往的争论可以影响公众看法，并最终影响投票行为。然而，反驳论点不仅仅是为了赢得争论；它也是培养真相和问责文化的重要途径。当个人花时间去反驳虚假信息时，他们为一个更有知识的社会贡献力量。这可以在各种在线平台上看到，用户积极通过提供可靠来源和合理的论点来挑战虚假叙述。这种行为促进了批判性思维，并鼓励他人质疑他们所遇到的信息的有效性。总之，反驳虚假说法的能力是我们现代社会的一项基本技能。无论是在科学讨论、学术写作还是政治辩论中，反驳虚假信息不仅澄清了真相，还增强了我们对复杂问题的集体理解。当我们在日益复杂的信息环境中航行时，让我们承担起反驳虚假信息的责任，倡导追求知识和真理。通过这样做，我们为一个更有知识和理性的世界做出贡献，帮助应对我们今天面临的挑战。