average agreement

简明释义

海损协议

英英释义

Average agreement refers to the typical level of consensus or harmony among a group of individuals regarding a particular issue or topic.

平均一致性是指一组个体在某个特定问题或主题上达成的典型共识或和谐程度。

例句

1.In the team meeting, we reached an average agreement on the project deadlines.

在团队会议上,我们对项目截止日期达成了平均一致性

2.The survey showed an average agreement of 75% among participants on the new policy.

调查显示参与者对新政策的平均一致性为75%。

3.The average agreement among the judges was crucial for determining the winner of the competition.

评委们的平均一致性对确定比赛获胜者至关重要。

4.After analyzing the data, the researchers found an average agreement of 80% between the two methods.

在分析数据后,研究人员发现这两种方法之间的平均一致性为80%。

5.The average agreement level in the study group was assessed to be quite high.

研究小组中的平均一致性水平被评估为相当高。

作文

In today's society, the concept of consensus plays a crucial role in decision-making processes, whether in politics, business, or social interactions. One term that often comes up in discussions about collective opinions is average agreement. This phrase refers to the general level of consensus reached among a group of individuals regarding a particular issue or topic. Understanding average agreement can help us navigate various situations more effectively and make informed decisions based on shared perspectives.To illustrate the importance of average agreement, let’s consider a scenario in a corporate environment. A company is planning to launch a new product, and the management team conducts a survey to gauge employee opinions on the product design and features. After collecting the data, they find that 70% of employees support the proposed design, while 30% have reservations. The average agreement within this team is relatively high, indicating that most employees are on board with the direction the company is taking. This consensus can empower the management to move forward confidently, as it reflects a majority opinion.However, it is essential to recognize that average agreement does not always equate to unanimous support. In the same example, the 30% of dissenting voices could represent significant concerns that, if overlooked, might lead to issues down the line. Therefore, while the average agreement suggests a favorable outlook, it is crucial to delve deeper into the reasons behind the dissent. Engaging with those who disagree can provide valuable insights that may enhance the final product, ensuring it meets the needs of a broader audience.In political contexts, average agreement serves as a barometer for public opinion. For instance, during an election campaign, candidates often rely on polls to measure voter sentiment regarding their platforms. If a poll indicates a high average agreement with a candidate's proposed policies, it may signal a strong likelihood of electoral success. Conversely, a low average agreement could indicate potential challenges ahead, prompting candidates to adjust their strategies or messaging to resonate more with voters.Moreover, the concept of average agreement extends beyond quantitative measures; it also encompasses qualitative aspects. For example, in community meetings where residents discuss local issues, the level of agreement can be assessed not just by counting votes but by understanding the depth of support or opposition expressed. A high average agreement accompanied by passionate endorsements may suggest a robust community backing, while a lower average agreement with mixed feelings could highlight the need for further dialogue and compromise.In conclusion, grasping the significance of average agreement is vital for effective communication and collaboration in various spheres of life. It helps us identify common ground while also acknowledging differing viewpoints. By fostering an environment where diverse opinions are valued, we can achieve more balanced and well-rounded outcomes. Whether in business, politics, or community engagement, recognizing and addressing the nuances of average agreement can lead to better decision-making and stronger relationships among individuals and groups. Ultimately, it is not just about reaching a consensus but understanding the dynamics that shape that consensus, allowing for a more inclusive and thoughtful approach to problem-solving.

在当今社会,达成共识的概念在决策过程中发挥着至关重要的作用,无论是在政治、商业还是社会互动中。一个常常出现在关于集体意见讨论中的术语是平均一致性。这个短语指的是一群人对某个特定问题或主题所达成的一般共识水平。理解平均一致性可以帮助我们更有效地应对各种情况,并根据共享的观点做出明智的决策。为了说明平均一致性的重要性,让我们考虑一个企业环境中的场景。一家公司计划推出一款新产品,管理团队进行了一项调查,以了解员工对产品设计和功能的意见。在收集数据后,他们发现70%的员工支持拟议的设计,而30%则持保留意见。该团队内的平均一致性相对较高,表明大多数员工支持公司正在采取的方向。这种共识可以使管理层有信心地向前推进,因为它反映了多数人的意见。然而,重要的是要认识到,平均一致性并不总是等同于全体支持。在同一个例子中,30%的反对声音可能代表着重要的担忧,如果被忽视,可能会导致未来的问题。因此,尽管平均一致性表明前景良好,但深入探讨反对意见背后的原因至关重要。与那些不同意的人进行交流可以提供宝贵的见解,从而增强最终产品的质量,确保其满足更广泛受众的需求。在政治背景下,平均一致性作为公众舆论的晴雨表。例如,在选举活动中,候选人通常依赖民意调查来衡量选民对其平台的情感。如果一项民调显示选民对候选人提议的政策有较高的平均一致性,这可能表明选举成功的强大可能性。相反,较低的平均一致性可能表明潜在的挑战,促使候选人调整他们的战略或信息,以更好地与选民产生共鸣。此外,平均一致性的概念不仅限于定量测量;它还包含定性方面。例如,在居民讨论地方问题的社区会议中,可以通过理解表达的支持或反对的深度来评估一致性水平。伴随着热情支持的高平均一致性可能表明社区的强大支持,而较低的平均一致性则可能突出需要进一步对话和妥协。总之,掌握平均一致性的重要性对于在生活的各个领域实现有效沟通和合作至关重要。它帮助我们识别共同点,同时也承认不同的观点。通过营造一个重视多样化意见的环境,我们可以实现更平衡和全面的结果。无论是在商业、政治还是社区参与中,认识和解决平均一致性的细微差别可以导致更好的决策和个人及团体之间更强的关系。最终,这不仅仅是关于达成共识,而是理解塑造共识的动态,从而允许更具包容性和深思熟虑的问题解决方法。