atomic defence

简明释义

防核

英英释义

例句

1.Experts believe that a robust atomic defence system is crucial for national security.

专家认为，强大的核防御系统对国家安全至关重要。

2.Innovations in technology are changing the landscape of atomic defence strategies.

技术创新正在改变核防御战略的格局。

3.The treaty aimed to reduce tensions by limiting atomic defence expenditures.

该条约旨在通过限制核防御支出来减少紧张局势。

4.The country has invested heavily in its atomic defence to deter potential aggressors.

这个国家在其核防御上投入了大量资金，以威慑潜在的侵略者。

5.During the Cold War, many nations focused on building their atomic defence capabilities.

在冷战期间，许多国家专注于建立他们的核防御能力。

作文

In the realm of international relations, the concept of atomic defence (原子防御) has emerged as a significant strategy for nations seeking to protect their sovereignty and deter aggression. The term refers to the use of nuclear weapons as a form of deterrence against potential adversaries. This strategy is rooted in the belief that the possession of nuclear capabilities can effectively prevent conflicts and maintain peace, as the consequences of a nuclear exchange would be catastrophic for all parties involved. Historically, the atomic defence (原子防御) strategy gained prominence during the Cold War, when the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in an arms race that saw both nations amassing vast arsenals of nuclear weapons. The doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD) became a cornerstone of this period, suggesting that any nuclear attack would be met with a devastating retaliatory strike, thus ensuring that neither side would initiate conflict. This precarious balance of power fostered a tense but stable environment, where direct confrontations were avoided due to the fear of annihilation.However, the reliance on atomic defence (原子防御) raises several ethical and moral questions. Critics argue that the existence of nuclear weapons creates an atmosphere of fear and insecurity, as nations may feel compelled to develop their own arsenals in response to perceived threats. This proliferation of nuclear weapons poses a significant risk, as more states acquire these capabilities and the likelihood of accidental or unauthorized launches increases. Furthermore, the environmental and humanitarian consequences of nuclear warfare are dire, leading to long-lasting effects on human health and the planet.In recent years, the landscape of atomic defence (原子防御) has evolved with the emergence of new technologies and geopolitical dynamics. Nations like North Korea have pursued nuclear programs in defiance of international norms, prompting debates about the effectiveness of traditional deterrence strategies. As non-state actors and rogue regimes become increasingly involved in global conflicts, the risks associated with nuclear weapons are amplified, necessitating a reevaluation of existing policies.Moreover, the discourse surrounding atomic defence (原子防御) has shifted towards disarmament and arms control initiatives. International treaties such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) aim to curb the spread of nuclear weapons and promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Advocates for disarmament argue that reducing nuclear arsenals can lead to a more stable world, as fewer weapons mean less potential for catastrophic conflict.In conclusion, the concept of atomic defence (原子防御) remains a contentious and complex issue within international relations. While it serves as a deterrent against aggression, the ethical implications and risks associated with nuclear weapons cannot be ignored. As global dynamics continue to change, it is imperative for nations to engage in open dialogue about disarmament and explore alternative security strategies that prioritize diplomacy over destruction. Only through collective efforts can we hope to create a safer world free from the threat of nuclear warfare.

在国际关系领域，原子防御的概念已经成为寻求保护主权和威慑侵略的重要战略。这个术语指的是将核武器作为对潜在敌人的一种威慑形式。这一战略根植于这样一种信念：拥有核能力可以有效地防止冲突并维持和平，因为核战争的后果对所有参与方来说都是灾难性的。历史上，原子防御在冷战期间变得突出，当时美国和苏联进行了一场军备竞赛，两国都积累了庞大的核武库。相互确保毁灭（MAD）的理论成为这一时期的基石，表明任何核攻击都将遭到毁灭性的报复打击，从而确保双方都不会发动冲突。这种脆弱的力量平衡促成了一个紧张但稳定的环境，在这种环境中，由于对毁灭的恐惧，直接对抗被避免了。然而，依赖于原子防御引发了若干伦理和道德问题。批评者认为，核武器的存在制造了一种恐惧和不安全的氛围，因为国家可能会因感知到的威胁而感到有必要发展自己的武器库。核武器的扩散构成了重大风险，因为越来越多的国家获得这些能力，意外或未经授权的发射的可能性也随之增加。此外，核战争的环境和人道后果是可怕的，导致对人类健康和地球的长期影响。近年来，原子防御的格局随着新技术和地缘政治动态的出现而演变。诸如朝鲜等国家无视国际规范，追求核计划，促使人们对传统威慑战略的有效性展开辩论。随着非国家行为者和流氓政权越来越多地参与全球冲突，核武器相关的风险加剧，这就需要重新评估现有政策。此外，围绕原子防御的讨论已转向裁军和军控倡议。国际条约，如《不扩散核武器条约》（NPT），旨在遏制核武器的扩散并促进核能的和平利用。裁军倡导者认为，减少核武库可以导致一个更稳定的世界，因为武器越少，发生灾难性冲突的潜力就越小。总之，原子防御的概念在国际关系中仍然是一个有争议且复杂的问题。虽然它作为对侵略的威慑，但与核武器相关的伦理影响和风险不能被忽视。随着全球动态的持续变化，各国必须就裁军进行开放对话，并探索优先考虑外交而非毁灭的替代安全战略。只有通过集体努力，我们才能希望创造一个没有核战争威胁的更安全的世界。