arrest of judgment

简明释义

阻止判决

英英释义

例句

1.In some cases, a judge may grant an arrest of judgment if new information comes to light.

在某些情况下，如果出现新信息，法官可能会批准延缓裁决。

2.The court granted an arrest of judgment to ensure all parties had a fair chance to present their cases.

法院批准了延缓裁决，以确保所有各方都有公平的机会陈述他们的案件。

3.The defendant's attorney filed for an arrest of judgment after discovering a procedural error.

被告的律师在发现程序错误后申请了延缓裁决。

4.The lawyer requested an arrest of judgment to allow time for further evidence to be presented.

律师请求对判决进行延缓裁决，以便有时间提交更多证据。

5.An arrest of judgment can provide a crucial opportunity for appeals in legal proceedings.

在法律程序中，延缓裁决可以为上诉提供至关重要的机会。

作文

In the realm of law, the term arrest of judgment refers to a legal procedure where the execution of a judgment is halted or postponed. This can occur for various reasons, often to allow for further investigation or consideration of new evidence that may affect the outcome of a case. The concept of arrest of judgment is vital in ensuring that justice is served and that no individual is unfairly penalized based on incomplete or erroneous information. The importance of this legal mechanism cannot be overstated. Imagine a scenario where a defendant is found guilty, but shortly after the verdict, new evidence emerges that could exonerate them. In such cases, the ability to invoke an arrest of judgment becomes crucial. It allows the legal system to pause and reassess the situation before any final decisions are made. This is not only a matter of legal protocol but also a reflection of the ethical obligation of the judicial system to uphold justice. Furthermore, the arrest of judgment serves as a safeguard against potential miscarriages of justice. History has shown that wrongful convictions can occur due to various factors, including inadequate legal representation, witness misidentification, or even prosecutorial misconduct. By allowing for an arrest of judgment, the legal system provides a mechanism to correct these errors before they lead to irreversible consequences. In practice, the process of seeking an arrest of judgment typically involves filing a motion with the court. The party requesting the arrest must present compelling reasons for why the judgment should be paused. This could include the introduction of new evidence, procedural errors during the trial, or even a change in the law that could impact the case. The judge then reviews the motion and decides whether to grant the arrest of judgment. The implications of granting an arrest of judgment can be significant. For the defendant, it may mean the difference between freedom and incarceration. For the legal system, it reinforces the principle that justice must be pursued relentlessly and that every effort should be made to ensure fair outcomes. Moreover, the notion of arrest of judgment extends beyond the courtroom. It resonates with broader themes of critical thinking and decision-making in everyday life. Just as the legal system pauses to reconsider a judgment, individuals can benefit from taking a step back in their own lives to reassess decisions before committing to them fully. This reflective approach can lead to better outcomes, whether in personal relationships, career choices, or other significant life decisions. In conclusion, the term arrest of judgment encapsulates a fundamental aspect of the legal system designed to protect individuals' rights and ensure fairness. It highlights the importance of due diligence, the pursuit of truth, and the constant vigilance required to uphold justice. As we navigate through our lives, let us remember the significance of pausing to reflect before making judgments—whether in law or in our personal endeavors. This practice not only fosters justice but also cultivates wisdom and understanding in our interactions with the world around us.

在法律领域中，术语arrest of judgment指的是一种法律程序，其中判决的执行被暂停或推迟。这种情况可能由于多种原因发生，通常是为了进行进一步调查或考虑可能影响案件结果的新证据。arrest of judgment的概念在确保公正的实现以及不让任何人基于不完整或错误的信息受到不公平惩罚方面至关重要。这一法律机制的重要性不容小觑。想象一个场景：被告被判有罪，但在裁决后不久，出现了可能使其无罪的新证据。在这种情况下，能够请求arrest of judgment变得至关重要。它允许法律系统暂停并重新评估情况，然后再做出最终决定。这不仅是法律程序的问题，也是司法系统履行公正伦理义务的体现。此外，arrest of judgment作为防止潜在冤假错案的保障也非常重要。历史表明，由于各种因素，包括法律代表不足、证人错误识别甚至检方不当行为，可能会发生错误定罪。通过允许进行arrest of judgment，法律系统提供了一种在不可逆转的后果发生之前纠正这些错误的机制。在实践中，寻求arrest of judgment的过程通常涉及向法院提交动议。请求暂停判决的一方必须提出令人信服的理由，说明为何应暂停该判决。这可能包括引入新证据、审判中的程序错误，甚至是可能影响案件的法律变更。法官随后审查动议并决定是否批准arrest of judgment。批准arrest of judgment的影响可能是重大的。对于被告来说，这可能意味着自由与监禁之间的差异。对于法律系统而言，它强化了追求公正的原则，强调在确保公正结果方面应尽一切努力。此外，arrest of judgment的概念超越了法庭。它与日常生活中批判性思维和决策的更广泛主题产生共鸣。正如法律系统暂停以重新考虑判决一样，个人在自己的生活中也可以受益于在完全承诺之前退一步重新评估决策。这种反思的方法可以导致更好的结果，无论是在个人关系、职业选择还是其他重大生活决策中。总之，术语arrest of judgment概括了旨在保护个人权利和确保公平的法律系统的基本方面。它突显了尽职调查、真相追求以及维护公正所需的持续警惕的重要性。当我们在生活中航行时，让我们记住暂停反思的重要性，在做出判断之前——无论是在法律上还是在个人努力中。这种做法不仅促进了公正，也在我们与周围世界的互动中培养了智慧和理解。