appellate jurisdiction

简明释义

上诉管辖权;上述裁决权

英英释义

例句

1.In many states, the Court of Appeals exercises appellate jurisdiction to review decisions made by lower courts.

在许多州，上诉法院行使上诉管辖权，以审查下级法院做出的裁决。

2.The Supreme Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases involving constitutional issues.

最高法院对所有涉及宪法问题的案件具有独占的上诉管辖权。

3.Federal courts have appellate jurisdiction over cases that involve federal law.

联邦法院对涉及联邦法律的案件拥有上诉管辖权。

4.When a party is dissatisfied with a trial court's ruling, they can seek relief in a court that has appellate jurisdiction.

当一方对初审法院的裁决不满时，他们可以寻求具有上诉管辖权的法院的救济。

5.The appellate jurisdiction of the circuit court allows it to hear appeals from various district courts.

巡回法院的上诉管辖权使其能够审理来自各个地区法院的上诉。

作文

The concept of appellate jurisdiction is crucial in the legal system, allowing higher courts to review and potentially change the decisions made by lower courts. This mechanism ensures that justice is served and that legal interpretations can be corrected if found to be flawed. In a typical legal framework, when a party is dissatisfied with a ruling from a lower court, they have the right to appeal to a higher court that possesses appellate jurisdiction. This process not only provides a check on the lower courts but also helps maintain consistency in the application of law across different cases.Understanding appellate jurisdiction requires a grasp of the hierarchy within the judicial system. Courts are generally organized into levels: trial courts, appellate courts, and sometimes, supreme courts at the top. Trial courts are where cases are initially heard and decided. If one of the parties believes that an error occurred during the trial, such as improper admission of evidence or incorrect jury instructions, they can file an appeal. The appellate court then examines the record of the lower court's proceedings to determine whether any legal mistakes were made that could have affected the outcome.One of the key features of appellate jurisdiction is that it does not involve a retrial of the case. Instead, the appellate court focuses on the legal issues presented in the appeal. This means that new evidence cannot typically be introduced; the court relies on the existing record. The appellate judges will review the arguments made by both sides, often through written briefs, and may hold oral arguments where attorneys present their cases.The role of appellate jurisdiction extends beyond merely correcting errors. It also serves to clarify and develop the law. When appellate courts make decisions, they often provide detailed opinions that explain the reasoning behind their rulings. These opinions can set important precedents that lower courts must follow in future cases, thereby shaping the interpretation of laws over time.Moreover, appellate jurisdiction varies significantly between different jurisdictions. In some systems, appellate courts have broad powers to review both factual and legal issues, while in others, they may only review legal questions. For instance, in the United States, the Supreme Court has the ultimate appellate jurisdiction and can choose which cases to hear, often selecting those that address significant constitutional questions or conflicts among lower courts.In conclusion, appellate jurisdiction is a fundamental aspect of the judicial system that upholds the principles of fairness and legal integrity. By allowing higher courts to review lower court decisions, it ensures that justice is not only done but seen to be done. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone studying law or interested in how the legal system operates. It reflects the dynamic nature of law and the ongoing dialogue between different levels of the judiciary, ultimately contributing to a more just society.

‘上诉管辖权’的概念在法律体系中至关重要，它允许高等法院审查并可能更改下级法院作出的裁决。这一机制确保了公正得到实现，并且如果法律解释存在缺陷，可以进行纠正。在典型的法律框架中，当一方对下级法院的判决不满意时，他们有权向拥有‘上诉管辖权’的高等法院提出上诉。这个过程不仅为下级法院提供了制衡，也有助于在不同案件中保持法律适用的一致性。理解‘上诉管辖权’需要掌握司法系统内的等级结构。法院通常分为几个层级：初审法院、上诉法院，有时还有位于顶层的最高法院。初审法院是案件首次听取和裁决的地方。如果其中一方认为在审判过程中发生了错误，例如不当的证据采纳或不正确的陪审团指示，他们可以提起上诉。上诉法院随后会检查下级法院审理记录，以确定是否存在可能影响结果的法律错误。‘上诉管辖权’的一个关键特征是它不涉及案件的重审。相反，上诉法院专注于上诉中提出的法律问题。这意味着通常不能引入新证据；法院依赖现有记录。上诉法官将审查双方提出的论点，通常通过书面简报，并可能进行口头辩论，律师在此呈现他们的案件。‘上诉管辖权’的作用不仅限于纠正错误。它还用于澄清和发展法律。当上诉法院做出裁决时，他们通常会提供详细的意见，解释其裁决背后的推理。这些意见可以设定重要的先例，供下级法院在未来案件中遵循，从而随着时间的推移塑造法律的解释。此外，‘上诉管辖权’在不同的管辖区之间差异显著。在一些体系中，上诉法院有广泛的权力来审查事实和法律问题，而在其他体系中，它们可能仅审查法律问题。例如，在美国，最高法院拥有最终的‘上诉管辖权’，可以选择审理哪些案件，通常选择那些涉及重要宪法问题或下级法院之间冲突的案件。总之，‘上诉管辖权’是维护公正和法律完整性的司法系统的基本方面。通过允许高等法院审查下级法院的裁决，它确保了公正不仅得以实现，而且被看见。理解这一概念对于任何研究法律或对法律系统运作感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。它反映了法律的动态特性以及不同级别的司法机关之间的持续对话，最终促进了一个更加公正的社会。