avoidance of policy

简明释义

保险失效

英英释义

例句

1.Their avoidance of policy regarding safety regulations resulted in several accidents at the site.

他们在安全法规方面的政策回避导致现场发生了几起事故。

2.The avoidance of policy on data privacy has raised concerns among customers.

关于数据隐私的政策回避引起了客户的担忧。

3.In order to ensure compliance, the manager addressed the avoidance of policy during the team meeting.

为了确保合规，经理在团队会议上提到了对政策的回避。

4.The organization faced backlash due to its avoidance of policy on environmental sustainability.

由于在环境可持续性方面的政策回避，该组织面临强烈反对。

5.The company's avoidance of policy regarding employee conduct led to a decline in workplace morale.

公司的对政策的回避导致员工士气下降。

作文

In the realm of governance and administration, the term avoidance of policy refers to the deliberate act of steering clear of certain regulations or guidelines that are typically expected to be followed. This phenomenon can occur for various reasons, including political maneuvering, public opinion, or even economic considerations. The implications of such avoidance can be profound, affecting not only the immediate stakeholders but also the broader societal context.One of the most significant aspects of avoidance of policy is its potential to undermine trust in governmental institutions. When policies are enacted, they are generally perceived as measures designed to protect the public interest or promote social welfare. However, when these policies are avoided, it raises questions about the integrity of those in power. For instance, if a government chooses to ignore environmental regulations in favor of industrial growth, it sends a message that economic interests are prioritized over ecological sustainability. This can lead to public disillusionment and decreased civic engagement, as citizens may feel their voices and concerns are not being heard.Moreover, the avoidance of policy can create an uneven playing field among businesses and individuals. Companies that adhere to established regulations may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage compared to those that exploit loopholes or evade compliance. This not only affects market dynamics but can also stifle innovation, as businesses may be less inclined to invest in sustainable practices if they believe their competitors can bypass such obligations without consequence.The consequences of avoidance of policy extend beyond the economic realm and into the social fabric of communities. For example, if a government neglects to enforce laws aimed at protecting marginalized groups, it perpetuates inequality and social injustice. The avoidance of policies meant to address systemic issues can lead to increased tensions and divisions within society, as those affected by such negligence may feel marginalized and powerless.Addressing the issue of avoidance of policy requires a multifaceted approach. It is essential for civic organizations, advocacy groups, and concerned citizens to hold policymakers accountable. Transparency in governance can help mitigate the risks associated with policy avoidance. When citizens are informed and engaged, they are more likely to demand adherence to policies that serve the public good.Furthermore, fostering a culture of compliance and ethical governance is crucial. Educational initiatives that emphasize the importance of following established policies can empower future leaders to prioritize integrity over expediency. Encouraging dialogue between government officials and the public can also help bridge the gap between policy creation and implementation, ensuring that policies are not just theoretical constructs but practical tools for societal benefit.In conclusion, the avoidance of policy poses significant challenges to governance, economic fairness, and social equity. By recognizing the implications of this avoidance and actively working to counteract it, society can move towards a more equitable and just framework where policies are respected and upheld. The commitment to policy adherence is not merely a bureaucratic obligation; it is a cornerstone of democratic governance and a testament to a society's dedication to the common good.

在治理和管理的领域中，短语政策规避指的是故意避免遵循通常应遵循的某些法规或指导方针的行为。这种现象可能由于各种原因而发生，包括政治操控、公众舆论甚至经济考虑。这样的规避所带来的影响可能深远，不仅影响直接利益相关者，还影响更广泛的社会背景。政策规避的一个重要方面是它可能破坏对政府机构的信任。当政策被颁布时，通常被视为旨在保护公众利益或促进社会福利的措施。然而，当这些政策被规避时，就会引发关于掌权者诚信的问题。例如，如果政府选择无视环境法规以促进工业增长，这就传达了经济利益优先于生态可持续性的讯息。这可能导致公众失望和公民参与度降低，因为公民可能会觉得他们的声音和关切没有得到倾听。此外，政策规避可能在企业和个人之间造成不平等竞争的局面。遵循既定法规的公司可能会发现自己在与那些利用漏洞或逃避合规的公司竞争时处于劣势。这不仅影响市场动态，还可能抑制创新，因为如果企业认为其竞争对手可以在没有后果的情况下绕过此类义务，他们可能不太愿意投资于可持续实践。政策规避的后果超越了经济领域，深入到社区的社会结构中。例如，如果政府忽视执行旨在保护边缘群体的法律，就会延续不平等和社会不公。对旨在解决系统性问题的政策的规避可能导致社会内部紧张和分裂的加剧，因为受到这种忽视影响的人可能会感到被边缘化和无力。解决政策规避问题需要多方面的方法。公民组织、倡导团体和关心的公民必须对政策制定者进行问责。治理透明度有助于减轻与政策规避相关的风险。当公民知情并参与时，他们更有可能要求遵守服务于公共利益的政策。此外，培养合规和道德治理的文化至关重要。强调遵循已建立政策重要性的教育举措可以使未来的领导者优先考虑诚信而非权宜之计。鼓励政府官员与公众之间的对话也可以帮助弥合政策制定与实施之间的差距，确保政策不仅仅是理论构想，而是社会受益的实用工具。总之，政策规避对治理、公平经济和社会公正提出了重大挑战。通过认识到这种规避的影响并积极努力反制，社会可以朝着一个更加公平和公正的框架发展，在这个框架中，政策受到尊重和维护。遵守政策的承诺不仅仅是一种官僚义务；它是民主治理的基石，也是社会对共同利益的承诺的证明。