aggressive dumping

简明释义

侵略性的倾销

英英释义

例句

1.During the trade negotiations, the issue of aggressive dumping 激进倾销 came up as a major concern for local manufacturers.

在贸易谈判中，激进倾销 aggressive dumping的问题成为当地制造商的主要关注点。

2.The government imposed tariffs to counteract the effects of aggressive dumping 激进倾销 from foreign competitors.

政府征收关税以抵消来自外国竞争者的激进倾销 aggressive dumping的影响。

3.Consumers benefited from aggressive dumping 激进倾销 as prices for certain products dropped significantly.

消费者从激进倾销 aggressive dumping中受益，某些产品的价格大幅下降。

4.The report highlighted the negative impact of aggressive dumping 激进倾销 on domestic industries.

报告强调了激进倾销 aggressive dumping对国内产业的负面影响。

5.The company was accused of aggressive dumping 激进倾销 to gain market share in the new region.

该公司因在新地区进行激进倾销 aggressive dumping而受到指控，以获得市场份额。

作文

In today's global market, businesses often face fierce competition, which can lead to various strategies aimed at gaining market share. One such strategy is known as aggressive dumping, a practice where companies sell their products at significantly lower prices in foreign markets than they do in their domestic markets. This tactic is typically employed to undercut local competitors and quickly establish a presence in a new market. While it may seem beneficial for consumers in the short term due to lower prices, aggressive dumping can have severe long-term consequences for both the economy and the affected industries.The primary motivation behind aggressive dumping is to eliminate competition. By offering products at unsustainable prices, companies can drive local businesses out of the market. Once these competitors are eliminated, the dumping company can increase prices again, often leading to a monopoly or oligopoly situation. This not only harms local industries but also affects consumers who may eventually face higher prices and fewer choices.Moreover, aggressive dumping can lead to trade disputes between countries. Nations that experience this practice often respond with tariffs or other trade barriers to protect their local industries. For instance, if a foreign company is selling electronics at a fraction of the cost of local manufacturers, the government may impose tariffs on those imports to level the playing field. Such measures can escalate into trade wars, further complicating international relations and affecting global economic stability.Another significant impact of aggressive dumping is on employment. When local businesses struggle to compete with dumped products, they may be forced to downsize or shut down entirely. This results in job losses and can devastate communities that rely on these industries for employment. The ripple effect can be extensive, affecting suppliers, service providers, and even local economies that depend on the spending power of those employed in the affected industries.In addition to economic consequences, aggressive dumping raises ethical concerns. Companies engaging in this practice often prioritize profits over fair competition and the welfare of local communities. This approach can lead to a race to the bottom, where businesses cut corners to maintain low prices, potentially compromising product quality and safety standards. Consumers may initially benefit from lower prices, but they might ultimately suffer from inferior products and reduced industry standards.To combat aggressive dumping, countries need to work together to establish fair trade practices and regulations. International organizations, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), play a crucial role in monitoring and addressing unfair trading practices. By promoting transparency and equitable trade, nations can help ensure that competition remains healthy and sustainable.In conclusion, while aggressive dumping may provide short-term advantages for consumers, its long-term effects can be detrimental to local economies, industries, and employment. It is essential for governments and international bodies to recognize and address this issue proactively. By fostering fair competition and protecting local businesses, we can create a more balanced and equitable global marketplace that benefits everyone involved.

在当今全球市场中，企业常常面临激烈的竞争，这可能导致各种旨在获取市场份额的策略。其中一种策略被称为激进倾销，这是指公司以远低于其国内市场的价格在国外市场销售产品。这种战术通常用于削弱当地竞争对手，并迅速在新市场建立存在。虽然从短期来看，由于价格较低，消费者似乎受益，但激进倾销可能对经济和受影响行业产生严重的长期后果。激进倾销背后的主要动机是消除竞争。通过以不可持续的价格提供产品，公司可以将当地企业驱逐出市场。一旦这些竞争对手被消灭，倾销公司就可以再次提高价格，往往导致垄断或寡头垄断的情况。这不仅会损害当地行业，还会影响消费者，后者最终可能面临更高的价格和更少的选择。此外，激进倾销可能导致国家之间的贸易争端。经历这种做法的国家通常会通过关税或其他贸易壁垒来保护本国的行业。例如，如果一家外国公司以当地制造商成本的一小部分出售电子产品，政府可能会对这些进口商品征收关税，以平衡竞争环境。这种措施可能升级为贸易战，进一步复杂化国际关系并影响全球经济稳定。激进倾销的另一个重大影响是对就业的影响。当当地企业难以与倾销产品竞争时，它们可能被迫裁员或完全关闭。这导致失业，并可能对依赖这些行业就业的社区造成毁灭性影响。连锁反应可能非常广泛，影响供应商、服务提供商，甚至依赖受影响行业消费能力的地方经济。除了经济后果外，激进倾销还引发了伦理问题。参与这种做法的公司往往优先考虑利润，而不是公平竞争和当地社区的福祉。这种做法可能导致恶性竞争，企业为了维持低价格而削减成本，可能会危及产品质量和安全标准。消费者最初可能从低价中受益，但他们最终可能因劣质产品和降低的行业标准而遭受损失。为了打击激进倾销，各国需要共同努力，建立公平的贸易实践和法规。国际组织，如世界贸易组织（WTO），在监测和解决不公平贸易实践方面发挥着至关重要的作用。通过促进透明和公平的贸易，各国可以帮助确保竞争保持健康和可持续。总之，尽管激进倾销可能为消费者提供短期优势，但其长期影响可能对当地经济、行业和就业造成损害。政府和国际机构必须主动认识和解决这一问题。通过促进公平竞争和保护当地企业，我们可以创造一个更平衡和公平的全球市场，使所有参与者都受益。