Agency by Estoppel

简明释义

表见代理

英英释义

例句

1.In a case of Agency by Estoppel, the court ruled that the principal could not deny the agent's authority because they had previously acted in a way that led third parties to believe the agent was authorized.

在一个Agency by Estoppel的案例中，法庭裁定，委托人不能否认代理人的权力，因为他们之前的行为使第三方相信代理人是被授权的。

2.The company was held liable for the actions of its employee under Agency by Estoppel, as they had allowed him to represent them without proper authorization.

由于公司允许员工在没有适当授权的情况下代表他们，因此根据Agency by Estoppel，公司被判定对其员工的行为负责。

3.When the landlord accepted rent from the tenant, it created an Agency by Estoppel relationship, implying that the landlord recognized the tenant's authority to occupy the property.

当房东接受租金时，这创建了一个Agency by Estoppel关系，暗示房东承认租户有权占有该物业。

4.The client assumed that the contractor had the authority to make decisions on their behalf due to past interactions, which constituted Agency by Estoppel.

由于过去的互动，客户假设承包商有权代表他们做决定，这构成了Agency by Estoppel。

5.The supplier continued to deliver goods based on the customer's previous orders, establishing an Agency by Estoppel when the customer failed to inform them of any changes.

供应商继续根据客户的先前订单交付货物，当客户未能通知他们任何更改时，建立了一个Agency by Estoppel。

作文

The concept of Agency by Estoppel plays a crucial role in the field of contract law and agency relationships. It refers to a situation where a principal is prevented from denying the existence of an agency relationship due to their own conduct or representations that led a third party to reasonably believe that such a relationship existed. Essentially, it serves to protect the interests of third parties who rely on the apparent authority of an agent, even if that authority was not formally granted. This principle is vital in ensuring fairness and preventing injustice in commercial transactions.To better understand Agency by Estoppel, let’s consider a practical example. Imagine a scenario where a business owner, Mr. Smith, consistently allows his employee, Ms. Johnson, to negotiate contracts on behalf of the company without explicitly stating her limitations. If Ms. Johnson enters into a contract with a supplier, and the supplier believes that she has the authority to do so based on her past actions, Mr. Smith may be estopped from denying her authority. This means that he cannot later claim that Ms. Johnson did not have the right to enter into that agreement, as his previous conduct led the supplier to reasonably assume otherwise.The legal principle behind Agency by Estoppel is rooted in the idea of fairness and reasonable reliance. When a principal creates a situation where a third party believes an agency exists, it would be unjust for the principal to later deny that agency. Courts often look at the conduct of the principal to determine whether they acted in a way that could mislead third parties. If a principal remains silent or fails to correct a misunderstanding regarding an agent’s authority, they may be held liable for any agreements made under that assumption.Moreover, Agency by Estoppel can also arise in situations involving representations made by the principal. For instance, if a principal explicitly states that an individual is their agent, they cannot later deny that agency if the individual acts within the scope of their perceived authority. This is particularly important in business contexts where trust and reliance on representations are foundational to successful transactions.In conclusion, Agency by Estoppel serves as a protective mechanism for third parties in contractual relationships. It emphasizes the importance of consistency in a principal's actions and representations regarding their agents. By preventing principals from denying agency relationships that they have created through their conduct, the law fosters trust and reliability in business dealings. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone involved in contractual agreements, as it underscores the significance of clear communication and the potential consequences of one’s actions in establishing agency relationships. Thus, businesses must be mindful of how they present their agents and ensure that their conduct aligns with their intended authority to avoid complications arising from Agency by Estoppel.

‘代理禁反言（Agency by Estoppel）’的概念在合同法和代理关系领域中起着至关重要的作用。它指的是一种情况，即由于委托人的行为或陈述，导致第三方合理相信存在代理关系，因此委托人被禁止否认这种关系的存在。基本上，它旨在保护依赖代理人表面权力的第三方的利益，即使这种权力并未正式授予。这个原则在确保公平和防止商业交易中的不公正方面至关重要。为了更好地理解‘代理禁反言（Agency by Estoppel）’，让我们考虑一个实际的例子。想象一个场景，商店老板史密斯先生（Mr. Smith）一贯允许他的员工约翰逊女士（Ms. Johnson）代表公司谈判合同，而没有明确说明她的权限限制。如果约翰逊女士与供应商签订了一份合同，而供应商基于她过去的行为认为她有权这样做，史密斯先生可能会被禁止否认她的权力。这意味着他不能在后来的时候声称约翰逊女士没有权利签订该协议，因为他之前的行为导致供应商合理地假设了相反的情况。‘代理禁反言（Agency by Estoppel）’背后的法律原则根植于公平和合理依赖的理念。当委托人创造一种情况，使第三方相信存在代理关系时，委托人否认该代理关系将是不公正的。法院通常会审查委托人的行为，以确定他们是否以可能误导第三方的方式行事。如果委托人保持沉默或未能纠正关于代理人权力的误解，他们可能会对根据该假设达成的任何协议承担责任。此外，‘代理禁反言（Agency by Estoppel）’也可能出现在涉及委托人所作的陈述的情况下。例如，如果委托人明确表示某人是他们的代理人，那么如果该个人在其感知的权力范围内行事，他们就不能在后来的时候否认该代理关系。这在商业环境中尤为重要，因为信任和对陈述的依赖是成功交易的基础。总之，‘代理禁反言（Agency by Estoppel）’作为合同关系中对第三方的保护机制。它强调了委托人在其代理人行为和陈述方面的一致性的重要性。通过防止委托人否认他们通过自身行为创建的代理关系，法律促进了商业交易中的信任和可靠性。理解这一概念对于任何参与合同协议的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它强调了明确沟通的重要性以及在建立代理关系时行为可能带来的后果。因此，企业必须注意如何展示他们的代理人，并确保他们的行为与他们期望的权力一致，以避免因‘代理禁反言（Agency by Estoppel）’而产生的复杂情况。