adverse witness

简明释义

对方证人

英英释义

例句

1.The lawyer prepared thoroughly for cross-examination of the adverse witness 不利证人 to undermine their credibility.

律师为对不利证人的交叉审问做了充分准备，以削弱他们的可信度。

2.During the trial, the testimony of the adverse witness 不利证人 raised serious doubts about the defendant's alibi.

在审判过程中，不利证人的证词对被告的不在场证明提出了严重质疑。

3.In her closing arguments, the prosecutor emphasized the reliability of the adverse witness 不利证人 to strengthen her case.

在她的结案陈词中，检察官强调了不利证人的可靠性，以加强她的案件。

4.The defense team was caught off guard by the adverse witness 不利证人 who provided unexpected evidence.

辩护团队被不利证人提供的意外证据所震惊。

5.The judge allowed the adverse witness 不利证人's statement to be included in the record despite objections.

法官允许不利证人的陈述尽管有异议，但仍被纳入记录。

作文

In the realm of law, the term adverse witness refers to an individual who provides testimony that is unfavorable or detrimental to the party that has called them to testify. This concept is crucial in both civil and criminal cases, as the credibility and reliability of witnesses can significantly influence the outcome of a trial. Understanding the role of an adverse witness is essential for legal practitioners, as it allows them to prepare effectively for cross-examinations and to strategize their arguments accordingly.The presence of an adverse witness can often turn the tide of a case. For instance, in a personal injury lawsuit, if the plaintiff calls a friend to testify about the circumstances of the accident, but that friend ends up providing information that contradicts the plaintiff's narrative, they become an adverse witness. This situation can create significant challenges for the plaintiff’s case, as the jury may find the conflicting testimony more credible than the plaintiff's account.Moreover, the examination of an adverse witness during a trial is a critical moment for lawyers. It requires skillful questioning to highlight inconsistencies or to undermine the witness's credibility. A well-prepared attorney can use the testimony of an adverse witness to their advantage by presenting it in a way that supports their case, even if the witness was initially thought to be unfavorable.In criminal cases, the stakes are even higher. An adverse witness could be someone who has direct knowledge of the events surrounding the alleged crime, potentially offering evidence that could absolve the accused or implicate them further. The defense attorney must be particularly astute when handling such witnesses, as their testimony can either solidify the prosecution's case or provide critical exculpatory evidence.Additionally, the concept of an adverse witness extends beyond the courtroom. In depositions and pre-trial proceedings, parties may encounter witnesses whose statements do not align with their interests. Recognizing these individuals as adverse witnesses allows attorneys to adjust their strategies early in the litigation process, possibly leading to settlements or alternative resolutions before reaching trial.It is also important to consider the psychological aspect of dealing with adverse witnesses. Witnesses may feel pressured or intimidated when testifying against a party they know personally. Lawyers must navigate these dynamics sensitively, ensuring that the witness feels comfortable while still extracting necessary information. This balance is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the legal process and ensuring that justice is served.In conclusion, the term adverse witness encapsulates a vital aspect of legal proceedings. Whether in civil or criminal contexts, the impact of an adverse witness can be profound, influencing the strategies employed by legal teams and ultimately affecting the verdict. By understanding the nuances of how to deal with such witnesses, attorneys can better advocate for their clients, ensuring that all relevant evidence is presented effectively. The role of an adverse witness is not merely to complicate matters; rather, it serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in the pursuit of truth within the justice system.

在法律领域，术语不利证人指的是提供对其所作证方不利或有害证词的个人。这个概念在民事和刑事案件中都至关重要，因为证人的可信度和可靠性会显著影响审判的结果。理解不利证人的角色对于法律从业者来说至关重要，因为这使他们能够有效地为交叉询问做好准备，并相应地制定策略。不利证人的存在往往可以改变案件的进展。例如，在一起人身伤害诉讼中，如果原告叫一个朋友作证关于事故的情况，但那个朋友最终提供了与原告叙述相矛盾的信息，他们就成为了不利证人。这种情况可能会给原告的案件带来重大挑战，因为陪审团可能会发现相互矛盾的证词比原告的说法更具可信度。此外，在审判过程中对不利证人的审查是律师的一个关键时刻。这需要熟练的提问，以突出不一致之处或削弱证人的可信度。一位准备充分的律师可以利用不利证人的证词为自己辩护，即使该证人最初被认为是不利的。在刑事案件中，风险甚至更高。不利证人可能是直接了解所涉犯罪事件的人，可能提供能够证明被告无罪或进一步指控他们的证据。辩护律师在处理此类证人时必须特别敏锐，因为他们的证词可能会巩固检方的案件或提供关键的证据。此外，不利证人的概念不仅限于法庭。在证言和审判前程序中，各方可能会遇到与他们的利益不符的证人。将这些个人视为不利证人使律师能够在诉讼过程早期调整策略，从而可能在审判之前达成和解或替代解决方案。同样，处理不利证人的心理方面也很重要。证人在对抗他们认识的当事方作证时可能感到压力或受到威胁。律师必须敏感地驾驭这些动态，确保证人感到舒适，同时仍能提取必要信息。这种平衡对于维护法律程序的完整性和确保公正至关重要。总之，术语不利证人概括了法律程序中的一个重要方面。无论是在民事还是刑事背景下，不利证人的影响都可能深远，影响法律团队采用的策略，并最终影响裁决。通过理解如何处理这些证人的细微差别，律师可以更好地为客户辩护，确保所有相关证据得到有效呈现。不利证人的角色不仅仅是使事情复杂化；相反，它提醒我们追求真相过程中内在的复杂性。