admissible evidence

简明释义

可接受的证据

英英释义

例句

1.In order to convict the defendant, the prosecution must present admissible evidence that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

为了定罪，被告方必须提出可采纳的证据，证明其罪行超出合理怀疑。

2.The defense attorney argued that the documents were admissible evidence that supported their case.

辩护律师辩称这些文件是可采纳的证据，支持他们的案件。

3.During the trial, the jury was instructed to only consider admissible evidence when making their decision.

在审判过程中，陪审团被指示在做出决定时只考虑可采纳的证据。

4.The judge ruled that the witness's testimony was not admissible evidence because it was hearsay.

法官裁定证人的证词不是可采纳的证据，因为它是传闻。

5.The police report was deemed admissible evidence after the proper chain of custody was established.

在建立了适当的证据保管链后，警方报告被视为可采纳的证据。

作文

In the realm of law, the concept of admissible evidence is crucial for ensuring a fair trial and maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. Admissible evidence refers to any evidence that is allowed to be presented in court, as it meets the necessary legal standards. This can include a variety of materials such as witness testimonies, documents, photographs, and physical objects. The determination of what constitutes admissible evidence is governed by rules established by law, which vary from one jurisdiction to another. The importance of admissible evidence cannot be overstated. It serves as the backbone of any legal case, providing the facts and information that judges and juries rely on to make informed decisions. Without admissible evidence, a case may crumble, regardless of how compelling the arguments may be. For instance, if a lawyer presents hearsay or irrelevant information, it will likely be deemed inadmissible, and the case could suffer as a result.To illustrate this point, consider a criminal trial where the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution would need to present admissible evidence that directly links the defendant to the crime. This might include DNA evidence, surveillance footage, or credible eyewitness accounts. If any of this evidence is ruled inadmissible, it could significantly weaken the prosecution’s case, potentially leading to an acquittal.Moreover, the process of determining admissible evidence often involves pre-trial motions and hearings. Lawyers may file motions to suppress certain pieces of evidence if they believe that the evidence was obtained unlawfully or does not meet the required standards. For example, if police conducted an illegal search without a warrant, any evidence obtained during that search may be excluded as admissible evidence. This principle is rooted in the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.In addition to legal standards, the credibility of the source providing the evidence plays a critical role in its admissibility. Testimonies from expert witnesses, for instance, must demonstrate reliability and relevance to the case at hand. A judge may rule that certain expert testimony is not admissible evidence if the expert lacks the proper qualifications or if their methods are not scientifically accepted. Thus, the weight and quality of admissible evidence can greatly influence the outcome of a trial.Furthermore, the concept of admissible evidence extends beyond criminal cases into civil litigation as well. In civil cases, parties seek to resolve disputes over rights, obligations, or liabilities. Here too, the presentation of admissible evidence is essential for establishing claims or defenses. For instance, in a personal injury lawsuit, the plaintiff must provide admissible evidence such as medical records, witness statements, and accident reports to substantiate their claims against the defendant.In conclusion, understanding the significance of admissible evidence is paramount for anyone involved in the legal system. It not only shapes the proceedings of a trial but also upholds the principles of justice and fairness. As such, both lawyers and individuals must be aware of what qualifies as admissible evidence to effectively navigate the complexities of the law. Failure to recognize these standards can lead to unfavorable outcomes, underscoring the necessity of thorough preparation and knowledge in legal matters.

在法律领域，可采证据的概念对确保公正审判和维护司法程序的完整性至关重要。可采证据是指任何被允许在法庭上呈现的证据，因为它符合必要的法律标准。这可以包括各种材料，例如证人证言、文件、照片和实物。什么构成可采证据的判断由法律规定的规则来决定，这些规则因管辖权的不同而有所不同。可采证据的重要性不容小觑。它是任何法律案件的支柱，提供法官和陪审团依赖以做出明智决策的事实和信息。如果没有可采证据，一个案件可能会崩溃，无论论点多么令人信服。例如，如果律师提出的是传闻或无关的信息，它可能会被认为是不可采纳的，案件因此可能受到影响。为了说明这一点，考虑一个刑事审判，其中控方必须证明被告的罪行超出合理怀疑。控方需要提出与犯罪直接相关的可采证据，这可能包括DNA证据、监控录像或可信的目击者证词。如果这些证据中的任何一项被裁定为不可采纳，这可能会显著削弱控方的案件，潜在导致无罪释放。此外，确定可采证据的过程通常涉及审判前的动议和听证会。如果律师认为某些证据是非法获得的或不符合要求的标准，他们可能会提出排除该证据的动议。例如，如果警方在没有搜查令的情况下进行了非法搜查，那么在该搜查中获得的任何证据可能会被排除为可采证据。这一原则根植于美国宪法第四修正案，保护个人免受不合理的搜查和扣押。除了法律标准外，提供证据来源的可信度在其可采性中也起着关键作用。例如，专家证人的证词必须证明其可靠性和与案件的相关性。如果法官裁定某些专家证词不是可采证据，这可能是因为该专家缺乏适当的资格或其方法不被科学界接受。因此，可采证据的分量和质量可以极大地影响审判结果。此外，可采证据的概念不仅限于刑事案件，也延伸到民事诉讼中。在民事案件中，各方寻求解决权利、义务或责任的争议。在这里，呈现可采证据对于建立索赔或辩护至关重要。例如，在人身伤害诉讼中，原告必须提供可采证据，如医疗记录、证人陈述和事故报告，以支持他们对被告的索赔。总之，理解可采证据的重要性对于任何参与法律系统的人来说都是至关重要的。它不仅塑造了审判的程序，还维护了正义和公平的原则。因此，律师和个人都必须了解什么被视为可采证据，以有效应对法律的复杂性。未能认识到这些标准可能导致不利的结果，这突显了在法律事务中充分准备和知识的必要性。