coarse grading

简明释义

粗级配

英英释义

例句

1.During the road construction, the team performed coarse grading to level the terrain.

在道路建设过程中，团队进行了粗糙分级以平整地形。

2.The construction company used coarse grading to prepare the site for the foundation.

建筑公司使用粗糙分级来为基础准备工地。

3.The engineer recommended coarse grading to achieve a stable base for the pavement.

工程师建议使用粗糙分级来实现人行道的稳定基础。

4.For the new park, coarse grading was essential to create walking paths.

为了新公园，粗糙分级对创建步道至关重要。

5.In landscaping, coarse grading helps ensure proper drainage.

在园艺中，粗糙分级有助于确保适当的排水。

作文

In the field of education, assessment plays a crucial role in determining students' understanding and progress. One method that has gained attention is the practice of coarse grading, which refers to a system where grades are assigned in broad categories rather than using a fine scale. This approach can be beneficial in certain contexts but also raises questions about its effectiveness and fairness. In this essay, I will explore the implications of coarse grading and how it impacts both students and educators.Firstly, one of the main advantages of coarse grading is that it simplifies the grading process. Traditional grading systems often involve a detailed rubric with numerous criteria, which can be time-consuming for teachers to apply consistently. By using a coarse grading system, educators can quickly categorize student performance into larger groups, such as 'satisfactory', 'needs improvement', or 'excellent'. This efficiency can save valuable time, allowing teachers to focus more on instruction and less on administrative tasks.Moreover, coarse grading can reduce the stress and anxiety associated with grades among students. In a high-stakes environment where every percentage point counts, students may become overly fixated on achieving the highest marks. By utilizing a broader grading scale, students might feel less pressure to attain perfection and instead focus on their overall understanding of the subject matter. This shift in mindset can foster a more positive learning environment where students are encouraged to take risks and engage more deeply with the material.However, there are also notable drawbacks to coarse grading. One significant concern is that it may oversimplify the complexities of student performance. For instance, two students who receive the same grade under a coarse system may have vastly different levels of understanding or effort. This lack of nuance can lead to misunderstandings about a student's abilities and may not provide adequate feedback for improvement. Educators may find it challenging to identify specific areas where a student needs help, ultimately hindering their academic growth.Additionally, coarse grading can create disparities in how students perceive their achievements. Some students may feel demotivated if they believe their hard work is not accurately reflected in their grades. This feeling can be particularly pronounced in competitive academic environments where students compare themselves to their peers. As a result, the very system designed to alleviate pressure may inadvertently create new forms of stress and competition among students.In conclusion, while coarse grading offers certain advantages such as efficiency and reduced anxiety, it also presents challenges that cannot be ignored. It is essential for educators to weigh the pros and cons of this grading method carefully. Ultimately, the goal should be to find a balance that promotes student learning and motivation while providing meaningful feedback on their performance. As education continues to evolve, exploring various assessment methods, including coarse grading, will be crucial in shaping effective teaching practices and fostering an enriching learning environment for all students.

在教育领域，评估在确定学生的理解和进步方面发挥着至关重要的作用。一种引起关注的方法是粗略评分的做法，它指的是一种以宽泛类别而非细致尺度来分配成绩的系统。这种方法在某些情况下可能是有益的，但也引发了关于其有效性和公平性的问题。在这篇文章中，我将探讨粗略评分的影响，以及它如何影响学生和教育工作者。首先，粗略评分的主要优势之一是简化了评分过程。传统的评分系统通常涉及详细的评分标准和众多标准，这可能使教师在保持一致性方面耗费大量时间。通过使用粗略评分系统，教育工作者可以快速将学生表现分类为较大的组别，例如“满意”、“需要改进”或“优秀”。这种效率可以节省宝贵的时间，让教师更多地专注于教学，而不是行政任务。此外，粗略评分可以减少学生对成绩的压力和焦虑。在一个每个百分点都至关重要的高风险环境中，学生可能会过于关注获得最高分数。通过利用更广泛的评分尺度，学生可能会感到压力减轻，从而更专注于对学科内容的整体理解。这种心态的转变可以促进一个更加积极的学习环境，在这里，学生被鼓励冒险并更深入地参与材料。然而，粗略评分也存在显著的缺点。一个主要的担忧是，它可能会简化学生表现的复杂性。例如，两个在粗略系统下获得相同成绩的学生，可能在理解或努力程度上存在巨大差异。这种缺乏细微差别可能导致对学生能力的误解，并且可能无法提供足够的反馈来促进改进。教育工作者可能会发现很难识别出学生需要帮助的具体领域，最终阻碍他们的学业成长。此外，粗略评分可能会造成学生对自己成就的看法存在差异。一些学生可能会感到沮丧，如果他们认为自己的努力没有在成绩中得到准确反映。这种感觉在竞争激烈的学术环境中尤为明显，学生们会相互比较。因此，这一旨在减轻压力的系统，可能无意中创造了新的压力和竞争形式。总之，虽然粗略评分提供了效率和减少焦虑等某些优势，但也提出了不容忽视的挑战。教育工作者必须仔细权衡这种评分方法的利弊。最终，目标应该是找到一种平衡，既促进学生学习和动机，又提供对他们表现的有意义反馈。随着教育的不断发展，探索各种评估方法，包括粗略评分，对塑造有效的教学实践和为所有学生营造丰富的学习环境至关重要。