regicide
简明释义
n. 弑君;弑君者;弑君罪
复 数 r e g i c i d e s
英英释义
杀害国王或君主的行为。 | |
实施杀君行为的人。 |
单词用法
弑君的行为 | |
作为政治工具的弑君 | |
历史上的弑君实例 | |
弑君审判 | |
弑君阴谋 | |
弑君与革命 |
同义词
杀王 | The act of regicide has historically led to political upheaval. | 杀王的行为在历史上常常导致政治动荡。 | |
君主杀害 | Regicides are often viewed as traitors in their own countries. | 杀王者通常被视为自己国家的叛徒。 |
反义词
忠诚 | 他对王室的忠诚毫不动摇。 | ||
支持 | The citizens showed their support for the monarchy during the crisis. | 在危机期间,市民们展现了对君主制的支持。 | |
效忠 | 她向国王宣誓效忠。 |
例句
1."The Master said, "In the event of partricide and regicide, they would not follow orders, either.
孔子说,“杀害父亲和君主的事,是不会听从的。”
2.Will there be new winning conditions in TAD, like Regicide?
tad会有新的胜利条件,例如弑君吗?
3.The idea of plunder, murder, and regicide !
是的,抢夺谋杀杀死沙皇的思想。
4.Milton probably around this time, around the time that he was writing and finishing the regicide treatises, began to lose his eyesight.
或许就是在这个时候,在他写作,这关于弑君的论文的时候,弥尔顿开始丧失视力的。
5.He looked at his son shameless faces ChuHanJun, such as ground RouTong, not the hand regicide hate means.
望着儿子无耻的嘴脸,储汉君肉痛如绞,恨不克不及亲手弑之。
6.He was arrested for being the regicide.
他因弑君的行为被捕了。
7.In history, many revolutions have been justified by the act of regicide, or 弑君.
在历史上,许多革命都以regicide或弑君的行为为依据。
8.During the French Revolution, regicide became a common term as many monarchs were executed, leading to 弑君成为一个常见的术语,因为许多君主被处决。
在法国大革命期间,regicide成为一个常见的术语,因为许多君主被处决。
9.The act of killing a king is known as regicide, which means 弑君.
杀死国王的行为被称为regicide,意思是弑君。
10.The novel depicted a fictional world where regicide was seen as a heroic act, symbolizing freedom from tyranny: 弑君被视为一种英雄行为,象征着摆脱暴政。
这部小说描绘了一个虚构的世界,在那里regicide被视为一种英雄行为,象征着摆脱暴政。
11.The trial for regicide was a significant event in the kingdom's history, marking a shift in power: 弑君的审判是王国历史上的一个重要事件,标志着权力的转变。
对regicide的审判是王国历史上的一个重要事件,标志着权力的转变。
作文
The concept of regicide has been a significant theme throughout history, often associated with political upheaval and the quest for power. Regicide refers to the act of killing a king or monarch, and it is a term that carries heavy connotations of betrayal and revolution. Throughout various cultures and eras, the act of regicide has been both celebrated and condemned, depending on the perspective of the historian or the societal context. In ancient times, the act of regicide was sometimes seen as a necessary evil, a means to rid a kingdom of a tyrannical ruler. For example, in the Roman Republic, the assassination of Julius Caesar was viewed by some as an act of liberation, while others saw it as a treacherous crime against a leader who had brought stability to Rome. This duality illustrates how regicide is often shrouded in moral ambiguity, where the motivations behind the act can be interpreted in vastly different ways.The Middle Ages also witnessed numerous instances of regicide, often intertwined with religious and ideological conflicts. The execution of King Charles I of England in 1649 is one of the most notable examples. His trial and subsequent execution were justified by his opponents as a necessary measure to protect the rights of the people against a monarchy that had become oppressive. This event marked a pivotal moment in British history, leading to the establishment of a republic, albeit a short-lived one. The regicide of Charles I not only changed the political landscape of England but also set a precedent for future revolutions around the world, where the overthrow of a monarch became a rallying cry for those seeking democratic governance.In literature, regicide has been a powerful motif, often used to explore themes of power, justice, and morality. Shakespeare's 'Macbeth' is a prime example, where the protagonist's ambition leads him to commit regicide in order to seize the throne. The play delves into the psychological ramifications of this act, showcasing how the murder of a king can lead to one's downfall and the unraveling of order within society. This portrayal serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of unchecked ambition and the moral dilemmas associated with regicide.In modern contexts, the notion of regicide has evolved, yet it still resonates in discussions about authority and governance. While outright killings of monarchs are rare today, the metaphorical implications of regicide can be seen in political discourse, where leaders are often 'killed' in the figurative sense through political maneuvering, scandal, or loss of public support. The symbolic act of regicide reflects the ongoing struggle between those in power and the governed, highlighting the fragile nature of authority.In conclusion, the term regicide encompasses a complex interplay of historical events, literary themes, and political ideologies. It serves as a reminder of the lengths to which individuals and groups will go to challenge authority and seek change. Whether viewed through the lens of history, literature, or contemporary politics, regicide remains a potent symbol of rebellion and the fight for justice. Understanding its implications helps us grasp the delicate balance between power and accountability in any society, making it a relevant topic for discussion even in today's world.
“regicide”一词在历史上一直是一个重要的主题,通常与政治动荡和权力的追求相关。“regicide”指的是杀死国王或君主的行为,这个词带有背叛和革命的沉重含义。在不同的文化和时代中,“regicide”的行为往往被庆祝或谴责,这取决于历史学家的视角或社会背景。在古代,“regicide”的行为有时被视为一种必要的恶,是摆脱暴君统治者的手段。例如,在罗马共和国,刺杀尤利乌斯·凯撒在某些人看来是解放的行为,而其他人则将其视为对一位为罗马带来稳定的领导者的背叛。这种二元性说明了“regicide”常常笼罩在道德模糊性之中,动机的不同可以被以截然不同的方式解读。中世纪也见证了许多“regicide”的实例,常常与宗教和意识形态冲突交织在一起。1649年,英格兰国王查理一世的处决就是一个最显著的例子。他的审判和随后的处决被反对者视为保护人民权利免受已经变得压迫的君主统治的必要措施。这个事件标志着英国历史上的一个关键时刻,导致了共和国的建立,尽管这是一个短暂的共和国。查理一世的“regicide”不仅改变了英格兰的政治格局,还为世界各地未来的革命设立了先例,其中推翻君主成为那些寻求民主治理者的口号。在文学中,“regicide”是一个强大的主题,常用于探索权力、正义和道德等主题。莎士比亚的《麦克白》就是一个典型的例子,主角的野心使他犯下“regicide”,以夺取王位。该剧深入探讨了这一行为的心理后果,展示了杀死国王如何导致个人的堕落以及社会秩序的崩溃。这种描绘作为对无节制的野心及与“regicide”相关的道德困境的警示。在现代背景下,“regicide”的概念已经演变,但它在关于权威和治理的讨论中仍然引起共鸣。虽然今天国王的公开杀戮很少见,但“regicide”的隐喻意义可以在政治话语中看到,领导者经常通过政治操控、丑闻或失去公众支持而在比喻意义上被“杀死”。“regicide”的象征性行为反映了掌权者与被治理者之间持续的斗争,突显了权威的脆弱性。总之,术语“regicide”包含了历史事件、文学主题和政治意识形态之间复杂的相互作用。它提醒我们个人和团体为了挑战权威和寻求变革而不惜一切代价的决心。无论是通过历史、文学还是当代政治的视角来看,“regicide”仍然是反叛和追求正义的强大象征。理解其含义有助于我们把握任何社会中权力与问责之间的微妙平衡,使其在当今世界仍然是一个相关的话题。