amicus

简明释义

[ˈæmɪkəs][əˈmaɪkəs]

n. (具体案件的)庭审顾问

复 数 a m i c i

英英释义

A legal term referring to a person or entity that is not a party to a case but offers information or expertise that may assist the court.

一个法律术语,指的是不是案件当事人的个人或实体,但提供可能帮助法庭的信息或专业知识。

Derived from Latin, meaning 'friend' or 'friend of the court'.

源自拉丁语,意为'朋友'或'法庭之友'。

单词用法

amicus curiae

n. 法庭之友(协助法庭解决问题的人);[法]法官的顾问

同义词

friend

朋友

He is a loyal friend who always supports me.

他是一个忠诚的朋友,总是支持我。

ally

盟友

The two countries formed an alliance to strengthen their defenses.

这两个国家结成联盟以加强他们的防御。

companion

伴侣

She is my companion on this journey.

她是我这次旅行的伴侣。

partner

伙伴

We are business partners working towards a common goal.

我们是商业伙伴,朝着共同的目标努力。

反义词

enemy

敌人

He was once a friend, but now he is my enemy.

他曾经是朋友,但现在是我的敌人。

opponent

对手

In the game, I have to face my opponent in the final match.

在比赛中,我必须在决赛中面对我的对手。

adversary

对立者

An adversary can often make you stronger.

对立者常常能让你变得更强。

例句

1.Amicus curiae greatly expand the abilities of the judges who find the real case, while the system with a specific combination of evidence system may prevent the discovery of the case fact.

法庭之友极大地扩充了法官发现案件真实的制度空间,同时,法庭之友与特定的证据制度的结合又可能阻碍案件真实的发现。

2.Chapter One reviews the history of Amicus Curiae.

第一章,法庭之友制度的历史回顾。

3.The Amicus Curiae originated from Roman law, and it supported the court as a neutral party at that time.

法庭之友起源于罗马法,原本为“法庭的朋友”,以中立的立场为法庭提供帮助。

4.The experience of the United States influenced the WTO dispute settlement system when the issue of the Amicus Curiae briefs is concerning.

WTO争端解决机制中法庭之友的实践在一定程度上就受到了美国的影响。

5.Amicus Plato Amicus Aristotle, send Magis Amicus Veritas.

柏拉图,亚里士多德传授以马吉斯真理。

6.The contribution of EC focuses on panel establishment, implementation of recommendations and rulings, compensation and the suspension of concessions, regulation of amicus curiae and so on.

欧共体把谈判的重点放在了专家组的组成、建议与裁决的执行、补偿与中止减让、法庭之友制度等方面。

7.Amicus curiae greatly expand the abilities of the judges who find the real case, while the system with a specific combination of evidence system may prevent the discovery of the case fact.

法庭之友极大地扩充了法官发现案件真实的制度空间,同时,法庭之友与特定的证据制度的结合又可能阻碍案件真实的发现。

8.Here's a link to the slew of amicus briefs in the Michigan cases.

连接到密西根州案例中其他利益方陈述的回顾。

9.The prevalence of amicus curiae in U. s. provides a lawful approach for psychologists to directly intervene with specific lawsuits.

美国“法庭之友”制度的盛行,为心理学家直接介入具体的诉讼案件提供了法律途径。

10.During the hearing, several amici 朋友们 presented their arguments to support the petitioner's case.

在听证会上,几个amici 朋友们提出了他们的论点,以支持申请人的案件。

11.The amicus 朋友 of the court submitted a brief outlining the implications of the ruling.

法院的amicus 朋友提交了一份简报,概述了裁决的影响。

12.An amicus 朋友 can help clarify legal points that are not easily understandable to the general public.

一个amicus 朋友可以帮助澄清一般公众不易理解的法律要点。

13.The organization acted as an amicus 法庭之友 to advocate for environmental protection.

该组织作为amicus 法庭之友,倡导环境保护。

14.In legal settings, a judge may appoint an amicus 法庭之友 to provide insights on complex issues.

在法律环境中,法官可能会任命一个amicus 法庭之友来提供对复杂问题的见解。

作文

In the realm of law, the term amicus curiae, which translates to 'friend of the court,' plays a crucial role in the judicial process. This legal concept allows individuals or organizations that are not parties to a case to offer their insights or expertise to assist the court in making informed decisions. The presence of an amicus can significantly influence the outcome of a case by providing additional perspectives that the court may not have considered otherwise.Historically, the use of amicus briefs can be traced back to ancient Rome, where they were utilized to help judges understand complex issues. Today, this practice is prevalent in many legal systems around the world, especially in cases that involve significant public interest, such as civil rights, environmental law, and constitutional matters. For instance, during landmark Supreme Court cases in the United States, various organizations often submit amicus briefs to highlight the broader implications of the court's decision on society.The value of an amicus lies in its ability to present information that may not be readily available to the court. Experts in specific fields, advocacy groups, and other stakeholders can provide data, research findings, or historical context that enriches the court's understanding of the issues at hand. This is particularly important in cases that require specialized knowledge, such as those involving technology, medicine, or social sciences.Moreover, amicus briefs serve as a platform for minority voices and underrepresented communities to be heard in the judicial system. By allowing these groups to participate indirectly in legal proceedings, the courts can ensure that their decisions reflect a more comprehensive view of society. This aspect of amicus involvement promotes justice and fairness, as it acknowledges the diverse perspectives that exist within the community.However, the role of an amicus is not without its challenges. Courts must carefully consider the relevance and credibility of the information presented in amicus briefs. There is a risk that some submissions may be biased or driven by ulterior motives, potentially skewing the court's understanding of the issues. Therefore, judges often exercise discretion in determining which amicus briefs to accept and how much weight to give them in their deliberations.In conclusion, the concept of amicus curiae is a vital component of the legal system that enhances the quality of justice. By allowing external parties to contribute their knowledge and perspectives, courts can make more informed decisions that take into account the complexities of modern society. As we continue to navigate an increasingly intricate legal landscape, the role of the amicus will undoubtedly remain significant, ensuring that justice is served not only to the parties involved but to the broader community as well.

在法律领域,术语amicus curiae,翻译为“法庭之友”,在司法过程中扮演着至关重要的角色。这一法律概念允许非案件当事人提供他们的见解或专业知识,以帮助法院做出明智的决定。amicus的存在可以显著影响案件的结果,因为它提供了法院可能未曾考虑的额外视角。历史上,amicus简报的使用可以追溯到古罗马,当时它们被用来帮助法官理解复杂问题。如今,这种做法在世界许多法律体系中普遍存在,尤其是在涉及重大公共利益的案件中,如民权、环境法和宪法事务。例如,在美国的里程碑式最高法院案件中,各种组织常常提交amicus简报,以突出法院判决对社会的更广泛影响。amicus的价值在于其能够提供法院可能无法轻易获得的信息。特定领域的专家、倡导团体和其他利益相关者可以提供数据、研究结果或历史背景,从而丰富法院对所涉及问题的理解。这在需要专业知识的案件中尤为重要,例如涉及技术、医学或社会科学的案件。此外,amicus简报还为少数民族声音和代表性不足的社区在司法系统中发声提供了平台。通过允许这些群体间接参与法律程序,法院可以确保其裁决反映社会的更全面观点。这一amicus参与的方面促进了正义和公平,因为它承认了社区中存在的多样化视角。然而,amicus的角色并非没有挑战。法院必须仔细考虑在amicus简报中提出的信息的相关性和可信度。有风险的是,一些提交可能存在偏见或受到隐含动机的驱动,可能会扭曲法院对问题的理解。因此,法官通常在决定接受哪些amicus简报及在审议中给予多少权重时行使自由裁量权。总之,amicus curiae的概念是法律系统的重要组成部分,增强了司法的质量。通过允许外部方贡献他们的知识和视角,法院可以做出更明智的决定,考虑到现代社会的复杂性。随着我们继续在日益复杂的法律环境中航行,amicus的角色无疑将保持重要性,确保正义不仅服务于相关当事人,也服务于更广泛的社区。