party line system

简明释义

同线电话制

英英释义

例句

1.Using a party line system 共用电话线路系统 can lead to eavesdropping on conversations by neighbors.

使用共用电话线路系统可能会导致邻居偷听谈话。

2.In some communities, a party line system 共用电话线路系统 is still the only option for phone communication.

在一些社区，共用电话线路系统仍然是唯一的电话通信选择。

3.The party line system 共用电话线路系统 was common in the early 20th century before private lines became affordable.

在20世纪初，共用电话线路系统是很常见的，直到私人电话线路变得负担得起。

4.The party line system 共用电话线路系统 requires everyone to be respectful of each other's privacy.

使用共用电话线路系统时，每个人都需要尊重彼此的隐私。

5.In rural areas, many families still use a party line system 共用电话线路系统 to share phone service.

在农村地区，许多家庭仍然使用共用电话线路系统来共享电话服务。

作文

The concept of a party line system is often discussed in the context of political communication and organizational behavior. A party line system refers to a situation where members of a political party or organization are expected to adhere strictly to the official policies and positions set by their leadership. This system can be beneficial in maintaining unity and coherence within a party, but it also raises concerns about individual expression and democratic debate.Historically, the party line system has been a prominent feature in various political regimes, particularly in authoritarian states. In such systems, deviation from the party line can result in severe consequences, including social ostracism, political exile, or even imprisonment. For instance, during the era of Soviet communism, party members were required to follow the dictates of the Communist Party closely. Any dissent was viewed as a threat to the party's stability and control, leading to a culture of fear and conformity.In democratic societies, the party line system can manifest in different ways. Political parties often develop platforms that outline their core beliefs and policies. Party members, especially those in elected positions, are generally expected to support these platforms to maintain party solidarity. However, this expectation can sometimes stifle open discussion and discourage innovative ideas. Members may feel pressured to conform, even if they have reservations about certain policies.The implications of a party line system extend beyond individual parties; they can affect the broader political landscape. When party loyalty overrides personal conviction, it can lead to polarization and gridlock in legislative bodies. Lawmakers may prioritize party loyalty over constituent needs, resulting in policies that do not reflect the diverse opinions of the electorate. This can erode public trust in political institutions and diminish civic engagement.Moreover, the rise of social media has complicated the dynamics of the party line system. While traditional media often presented a singular narrative dictated by party leadership, social media platforms allow for a multiplicity of voices. This has led to the emergence of factions within parties, as individuals express their dissenting views more openly. While this can democratize discussions within parties, it can also create fragmentation and weaken party cohesion.In conclusion, the party line system serves as both a unifying force and a potential barrier to genuine discourse in political settings. While it can help maintain a clear party identity and streamline decision-making, it also risks suppressing individual viewpoints and fostering an environment of conformity. To strike a balance, political parties must encourage open dialogue and allow for healthy debate among their members. By doing so, they can better represent the diverse perspectives of their constituents and promote a more vibrant democratic process.

“党派路线系统”的概念通常在政治沟通和组织行为的背景下进行讨论。“党派路线系统”指的是一种情况，在这种情况下，政党或组织的成员被期望严格遵守其领导层设定的官方政策和立场。这种系统在维护党内团结和一致性方面可能是有益的，但它也引发了对个人表达和民主辩论的担忧。历史上，“党派路线系统”在各种政治体制中都是一个显著特征，特别是在威权国家。在这种系统中，偏离党派路线可能导致严重后果，包括社会孤立、政治流亡甚至监禁。例如，在苏联共产主义时代，党员必须紧密遵循共产党指示。任何异议都被视为对党稳定和控制的威胁，导致一种恐惧和一致性的文化。在民主社会中，“党派路线系统”可以以不同方式表现出来。政党通常制定平台，概述其核心信念和政策。党员，尤其是那些担任公职的成员，通常被期望支持这些平台，以维护党的团结。然而，这种期望有时会扼杀公开讨论，抑制创新思想。成员可能感到压力，尽管他们对某些政策有保留意见，也要服从。“党派路线系统”的影响超出了个别政党；它们可以影响更广泛的政治格局。当党派忠诚压倒个人信念时，可能导致立法机构中的两极分化和僵局。立法者可能优先考虑党派忠诚，而不是选民的需求，从而导致不反映选民多样化意见的政策。这可能侵蚀公众对政治机构的信任，并减少公民参与。此外，社交媒体的兴起使“党派路线系统”的动态变得复杂。虽然传统媒体通常呈现由党派领导层决定的单一叙事，但社交媒体平台允许多元声音的出现。这导致党内出现派系，因为个人更公开地表达他们的异议。虽然这可以使党内讨论民主化，但它也可能造成分裂，削弱党内凝聚力。总之，“党派路线系统”既是统一力量，也是政治环境中真正话语的潜在障碍。虽然它可以帮助维持明确的党派身份并简化决策过程，但它也有可能抑制个人观点，营造出一种一致的环境。为了达到平衡，政党必须鼓励开放对话，允许成员之间进行健康辩论。通过这样做，他们可以更好地代表选民的多样化观点，促进更具活力的民主进程。