proscription

简明释义

英[prəˈskrɪpʃn]美[proʊˈskrɪpʃn]

n. 禁止；放逐；剥夺人权

复 数 p r o s c r i p t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Case examination also provided an opportunity to reintroduce values into the curriculum, despite their proscription in the ranks of behaviorally oriented texts.

案例考试同样给对课程中重新介绍一些价值提供了机会，尽管在很多行为主义导向的课本中仍然处于被忽视的境地。

2.The proscription of the intention in offence of intention is blurring, so we should restrict its scope of application.

目的犯中目的规定的模糊性使得其具有一些固有的弱点，所以，应当限制其应用范围。

3.Such considerations motivated the SETI group at the International Academy of Astronautics to reject a proscription of transmissions to the sky.

这些考虑激发了国际宇航科学研究院SETI小组的积极性去拒绝取缔向天空传送信号。

4.Case examination also provided an opportunity to reintroduce values into the curriculum, despite their proscription in the ranks of behaviorally oriented texts.

案例考试同样给对课程中重新介绍一些价值提供了机会，尽管在很多行为主义导向的课本中仍然处于被忽视的境地。

5.The proscription 禁令 against certain books has raised questions about freedom of speech.

对某些书籍的proscription禁令引发了对言论自由的质疑。

6.The government's proscription 禁止 of certain political parties has sparked widespread protests.

政府对某些政党的proscription禁止引发了广泛的抗议。

7.In ancient Rome, a proscription 剥夺公民权 could lead to severe consequences for those affected.

在古罗马，proscription剥夺公民权可能会给受影响的人带来严重后果。

8.The proscription 限制 of certain practices in the community has led to a decrease in crime rates.

社区中某些行为的proscription限制导致犯罪率下降。

9.His name was included in the proscription 被禁止名单, making him a target for government forces.

他的名字被列入了proscription被禁止名单，使他成为政府军队的目标。

作文

The concept of proscription, which refers to the act of forbidding or prohibiting something, has played a significant role throughout history. It is often associated with the idea of ostracism or exclusion from a community or society. In ancient Rome, for instance, a proscription was a public notice that listed individuals who were deemed enemies of the state, allowing for their arrest or execution without trial. This practice not only served as a means of political control but also instilled fear within the populace, demonstrating the power of the ruling authorities. In modern contexts, proscription can be seen in various forms, such as laws that ban certain organizations or ideologies that are considered dangerous to society. For example, many countries have laws against hate groups, where the proscription of these organizations aims to protect the rights and safety of citizens. However, the implementation of such bans can often lead to debates about freedom of speech and the extent to which a government should intervene in the beliefs and actions of its citizens.Moreover, the proscription of certain behaviors or practices can also be observed in social settings. For instance, in many cultures, there are unwritten rules regarding acceptable conduct, and those who violate these norms may face social exclusion or ostracism. This form of proscription serves to maintain societal order and cohesion, but it can also lead to negative consequences for individuals who are marginalized as a result.The implications of proscription extend beyond mere prohibition; they encompass issues of morality, justice, and human rights. When a government or society decides to impose a proscription, it must carefully consider the ethical ramifications of its actions. The balance between protecting the public and infringing on individual freedoms is a delicate one, and history has shown that excessive proscription can lead to tyranny and oppression.In conclusion, understanding the term proscription requires a multifaceted approach that considers historical, social, and ethical dimensions. Whether it is in the context of political regimes, legal systems, or cultural norms, proscription remains a powerful tool that shapes the dynamics of power and belonging in society. As we navigate the complexities of modern life, it is crucial to examine how proscription influences our interactions and the broader implications it has for our collective future. Through this lens, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the delicate balance between freedom and restriction, and the role that proscription plays in our lives.

‘proscription’这一概念指的是禁止或禁令的行为，在历史上发挥了重要作用。它通常与排斥或被排除在社区或社会之外的想法相关联。例如，在古罗马，‘proscription’是一种公共通知，列出了被视为国家敌人的个人，允许在没有审判的情况下逮捕或处决他们。这一做法不仅作为政治控制的手段，还在民众中制造了恐惧，展示了统治当局的权力。在现代背景下，‘proscription’可以以各种形式出现，例如禁止某些组织或意识形态的法律，这些组织或意识形态被认为对社会构成危险。例如，许多国家对仇恨团体有法律限制，‘proscription’这些组织的目的是保护公民的权利和安全。然而，这类禁令的实施往往引发关于言论自由和政府干预公民信仰及行为程度的辩论。此外，某些行为或实践的‘proscription’在社会环境中也可观察到。例如，在许多文化中，有关可接受行为的潜规则，违反这些规范的人可能面临社会排斥或孤立。这种形式的‘proscription’有助于维护社会秩序和凝聚力，但也可能导致因被边缘化而产生的负面后果。‘proscription’的影响超越了单纯的禁止，它涵盖了道德、正义和人权等问题。当一个政府或社会决定实施‘proscription’时，必须仔细考虑其行为的伦理后果。保护公众与侵犯个人自由之间的平衡是微妙的，历史表明，过度的‘proscription’可能导致暴政和压迫。总之，理解‘proscription’这一术语需要一种多方面的方法，考虑历史、社会和伦理维度。无论是在政治制度、法律体系还是文化规范的背景下，‘proscription’仍然是塑造社会权力和归属动态的强大工具。当我们在现代生活的复杂性中航行时，审视‘proscription’如何影响我们的互动及其对我们集体未来的更广泛影响至关重要。通过这一视角，我们可以更深入地理解自由与限制之间的微妙平衡，以及‘proscription’在我们生活中的作用。