rater

简明释义

英[ˈreɪtə(r)]美[ˈreɪtər]

n. 估价者；评定等级的人

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Almost all raters hold an optimistic view of rater training effect. Some raters put up their opinions and Suggestions on the improvement of training process.

几乎所有的评分员都对培训持积极态度，一些评分员就高考写作评分员培训过程提出了自己的意见和建议。

2.The majority of raters are willing to accept rater training and believe that rater training before actual rating is very important.

大部分评分员都愿意接受培训，并且认识到评分前培训的重要性。

3.So the rater training process was not as effective as we have expected.

因此，评分员培训过程并没有像预期的那样效果明显。

4.Experienced and inexperienced raters differ in their severity and intra-rater consistency before and after rater training.

有经验和没经验的评分员在培训前后宽严度和内部一致性有差异。

5.I'd rater walk or run to work.

我宁可步行或跑步上班。

6.Boulet et al., 1998a, 2001, 2002 recent changes to the PN scoring rubric and rater training regiment mandate that additional data be collected and analyzed.

Boulet等，1998年，2001年，2002年，但最近PN评分标准和分级员培训组织的变动要求额外数据的收集和分析。

7.And through testing by test-retest reliability, rater reliability and validity test, this study carried out the re-evaluation on the evaluation index system.

并通过重测信度测验、评分者信度测验和效度测验等方式对评价指标体系实施了再评价。

8.If barriers are too low, however, issuers will go rating-shopping to the laxest rater.

但如果门槛过低，证券的发行者将涌向最宽松的评级机构。

9.One major source of unreliability in performance assessment is inter-rater disagreement.

影响表现性评价结果信度的一个重要因素是评分者之间的不一致。

10.The film was reviewed by a popular rater, which helped increase its viewership.

这部电影被一位受欢迎的评分者评论，这帮助增加了它的观众人数。

11.Many online platforms rely on user raters to provide feedback on products.

许多在线平台依靠用户评分者来对产品提供反馈。

12.The app allows users to become a rater and share their opinions on various services.

这个应用程序允许用户成为评分者并分享他们对各种服务的看法。

13.As a food critic, the rater gave the restaurant a five-star rating.

作为美食评论家，这位评分者给这家餐厅打了五颗星。

14.After the event, each participant was asked to be a rater for the activities they attended.

活动结束后，每位参与者都被要求成为他们参加的活动的评分者。

作文

In today's world, the concept of evaluation has become increasingly important in various fields, from education to business. One term that frequently arises in this context is rater, which refers to an individual or system that assesses or judges the quality, performance, or characteristics of something. Understanding the role of a rater is essential for anyone involved in processes that require evaluation, whether it be in academic settings, workplace assessments, or even online reviews.In educational environments, teachers often act as raters when they grade assignments and exams. Their evaluations can significantly impact a student's academic journey, influencing everything from grades to future opportunities. The criteria used by raters can vary widely, including aspects such as clarity, creativity, understanding of the subject matter, and adherence to guidelines. Therefore, it is crucial for raters to be fair and consistent in their assessments to ensure that students receive accurate feedback on their performance.Similarly, in the business world, raters play a vital role in performance reviews. Managers and supervisors often evaluate employees based on their productivity, teamwork, and overall contributions to the company. These evaluations can determine promotions, raises, and even job security. For this reason, it is essential for raters to have clear criteria and a structured process in place to minimize biases and ensure that every employee is assessed fairly.Moreover, the rise of technology has introduced new forms of raters. Online platforms often utilize algorithms as automated raters to analyze user-generated content, such as product reviews or social media posts. These systems assess various factors, including relevance and engagement, to provide users with recommendations. While these automated raters can process vast amounts of data quickly, they may lack the nuanced understanding that human raters possess. Thus, combining human judgment with technological assistance can lead to more reliable evaluations.In addition to traditional roles, the concept of peer evaluation has gained traction, particularly in collaborative projects. In this scenario, team members become raters of each other's contributions. This method encourages accountability and fosters a culture of constructive feedback. However, it also requires raters to navigate interpersonal dynamics carefully to avoid conflicts and ensure that evaluations are based on merit rather than personal relationships.Furthermore, the importance of transparency in the evaluation process cannot be overstated. Whether in education, business, or online platforms, raters must communicate their criteria and methods clearly to those being evaluated. This transparency helps build trust and allows individuals to understand how their performance is assessed and what areas they need to improve.In conclusion, the role of a rater is multifaceted and critical across various domains. From educators grading papers to managers assessing employee performance, and even algorithms analyzing online content, raters influence decisions that can have lasting effects on individuals' lives. As we continue to navigate a world where evaluation is paramount, understanding the responsibilities and challenges faced by raters will be essential for fostering fair and effective assessment practices. By striving for objectivity, transparency, and consistency, raters can contribute to a more equitable evaluation landscape, benefiting everyone involved.

在当今世界，评估的概念在各个领域变得越来越重要，从教育到商业。一个在这种情况下经常出现的术语是rater，指的是评估或判断某物的质量、表现或特征的个人或系统。理解rater的角色对于任何参与需要评估的过程的人来说都是至关重要的，无论是在学术环境、工作场所评估，甚至是在线评论中。在教育环境中，教师在给作业和考试打分时通常充当raters。他们的评估可以对学生的学术旅程产生重大影响，影响从成绩到未来机会的一切。因此，raters使用的标准可能会有很大不同，包括清晰度、创造力、对主题的理解和遵循指导方针。因此，raters在评估中保持公平和一致性至关重要，以确保学生获得对其表现的准确反馈。同样，在商业世界中，raters在绩效评估中发挥着重要作用。经理和主管通常根据员工的生产力、团队合作和对公司的整体贡献来评估员工。这些评估可以决定晋升、加薪，甚至工作安全。因此，raters必须制定明确的标准和结构化的流程，以最小化偏见并确保每位员工都得到公平的评估。此外，技术的兴起引入了新的raters形式。在线平台通常利用算法作为自动化的raters来分析用户生成的内容，例如产品评论或社交媒体帖子。这些系统评估各种因素，包括相关性和参与度，以向用户提供推荐。尽管这些自动化的raters能够快速处理大量数据，但它们可能缺乏人类raters所具备的细致理解。因此，将人类判断与技术辅助结合起来，可以导致更可靠的评估。除了传统角色外，同行评估的概念也越来越受到重视，特别是在协作项目中。在这种情况下，团队成员成为彼此贡献的raters。这种方法鼓励责任感，并促进建设性反馈的文化。然而，这也要求raters小心地处理人际关系动态，以避免冲突并确保评估基于优点而非个人关系。此外，评估过程中的透明度的重要性不容小觑。无论是在教育、商业还是在线平台中，raters都必须清楚地传达他们的标准和方法，以便让被评估者了解。这种透明度有助于建立信任，使个人理解他们的表现是如何被评估的，以及需要改进的领域。总之，rater的角色在各个领域都是多方面且至关重要的。从教育工作者评分到管理者评估员工表现，甚至算法分析在线内容，raters影响着可能对个人生活产生持久影响的决策。随着我们继续在评估至关重要的世界中航行，理解raters所面临的责任和挑战对于促进公平有效的评估实践至关重要。通过努力追求客观性、透明度和一致性，raters可以为创建一个更公平的评估环境做出贡献，惠及所有参与者。