sortition

简明释义

英[/sɔːrˈtɪʃən/]美[/sɔːrˈtɪʃən/]

n. 抽签

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Methods: Divided the rats into treatment group, model group, sham operation group and normal group by sortition randomization method.

实验方法：将大鼠用抽签法随机分组，分为治疗组、模型组、假手术组和正常对照组。

2.Yesterday I went to my school to sortition decide whose paper will be in for examining by unitive censor. Then I took several pictures by the way.

昨天去学校抽签(决定是否参加全市统一的论文盲审)，顺便拍了几张照片。

3.Yesterday I went to my school to sortition decide whose paper will be in for examining by unitive censor. Then I took several pictures by the way.

昨天去学校抽签(决定是否参加全市统一的论文盲审)，顺便拍了几张照片。

4.Many modern democracies are exploring sortition 抽签 as a way to enhance political representation.

许多现代民主国家正在探索sortition 抽签作为增强政治代表性的一种方式。

5.Using sortition 抽签 for selecting representatives could lead to a more diverse government.

使用sortition 抽签选择代表可能会导致一个更加多元化的政府。

6.In ancient Athens, citizens often used sortition 抽签 to select officials for various government roles.

在古雅典，公民们常常使用sortition 抽签来选择各种政府职位的官员。

7.Some activists argue that sortition 抽签 can reduce corruption in politics.

一些活动家认为，sortition 抽签可以减少政治中的腐败现象。

8.The jury selection process is a form of sortition 抽签 that aims to ensure a fair trial.

陪审团的选择过程是一种sortition 抽签，旨在确保公正的审判。

作文

In recent years, the concept of sortition has gained traction as a potential solution to the problems of modern democracy. Sortition (抽签制) refers to the practice of selecting individuals for political office or decision-making roles through random selection rather than through elections. This method has its roots in ancient Athens, where it was used to choose public officials and jurors. Advocates argue that sortition can create a more representative and equitable political system, as it reduces the influence of wealth and special interests that often dominate electoral politics.One of the primary benefits of sortition is that it fosters greater civic engagement. When citizens know that they could be randomly selected to participate in governance, they may become more informed about political issues and more active in their communities. This increased engagement can lead to a more informed electorate, as people are motivated to understand the complexities of governance and policy-making.Moreover, sortition can help to break down social barriers and promote diversity in political representation. Traditional electoral systems often favor candidates from certain backgrounds, leading to a lack of representation for marginalized groups. By randomly selecting individuals from the population, sortition ensures that a wider range of voices and perspectives are included in the decision-making process. This inclusivity can lead to more comprehensive and effective policies that address the needs of all citizens.Critics of sortition argue that randomly selected individuals may lack the necessary expertise and experience to make informed decisions on complex issues. However, proponents counter that the process can be supplemented with training and support for those selected. Additionally, sortition does not eliminate the role of experts; rather, it allows for a more balanced approach where ordinary citizens collaborate with specialists to develop well-rounded solutions.Another concern is the potential for apathy among randomly selected individuals. Critics fear that people who are chosen through sortition may not take their responsibilities seriously or may lack the motivation to engage fully in the political process. To address this, it is crucial to create a culture that values civic duty and emphasizes the importance of participation in governance. Educating citizens about the significance of their role in a sortition system can help mitigate these concerns and encourage active involvement.In conclusion, sortition presents a compelling alternative to traditional electoral systems. By promoting diversity, enhancing civic engagement, and reducing the influence of money in politics, sortition has the potential to create a more representative and equitable political landscape. As democratic societies continue to grapple with issues of representation and accountability, exploring innovative methods like sortition may be essential for the future of governance. Embracing this ancient practice could lead to a revitalization of democracy, making it more responsive to the needs and voices of all citizens.

近年来，sortition（抽签制）的概念逐渐受到关注，被视为现代民主问题的潜在解决方案。Sortition 指的是通过随机选择而非选举来选拔政治官员或决策角色的做法。这一方法源于古雅典，当时用于选拔公职人员和陪审员。倡导者认为，sortition 可以创造一个更具代表性和公平的政治系统，因为它减少了财富和特殊利益对选举政治的影响。Sortition 的主要好处之一是促进更大的公民参与。当公民知道自己可能被随机选中参与治理时，他们可能会更积极地了解政治问题，并在社区中更加活跃。这种参与度的提升可以导致选民的知识水平提高，因为人们受到激励去理解治理和政策制定的复杂性。此外，sortition 有助于打破社会壁垒并促进政治代表性的多样性。传统的选举制度往往偏向某些背景的候选人，导致边缘群体缺乏代表性。通过从人口中随机选择个人，sortition 确保了更广泛的声音和视角被纳入决策过程。这种包容性可以导致更全面和有效的政策，满足所有公民的需求。Sortition 的批评者认为，随机选中的个人可能缺乏必要的专业知识和经验，无法在复杂问题上做出明智的决策。然而，支持者反驳说，这一过程可以通过对所选人员进行培训和支持来补充。此外，sortition 并不排除专家的角色；相反，它允许普通公民与专家合作，共同开发周全的解决方案。另一个担忧是随机选中的个人可能会产生冷漠。批评者担心，通过 sortition 选中的人可能不会认真对待他们的责任，或者缺乏充分参与政治过程的动机。为了解决这个问题，创造一种重视公民责任和强调参与治理重要性的文化至关重要。教育公民了解他们在 sortition 系统中的角色的重要性，可以帮助缓解这些担忧，并鼓励积极参与。总之，sortition 提供了一种引人注目的替代传统选举制度的方法。通过促进多样性、增强公民参与和减少金钱对政治的影响，sortition 有潜力创造一个更具代表性和公平的政治格局。随着民主社会继续面临代表性和问责制的问题，探索像 sortition 这样的创新方法可能对未来的治理至关重要。接受这一古老的做法可能会导致民主的复兴，使其更能响应所有公民的需求和声音。