self-sufficiency; autarky; autarchy

简明释义

自给自足

英英释义

例句

1.Countries that practice autarky 闭关自守 often face challenges in international trade.

实行闭关自守 闭关自守的国家通常在国际贸易中面临挑战。

2.During the economic crisis, many families turned to autarky 闭关自守 by growing their own vegetables.

在经济危机期间，许多家庭通过种植自己的蔬菜转向了闭关自守 闭关自守。

3.Investing in renewable energy can lead to greater self-sufficiency 自给自足 for communities.

投资可再生能源可以使社区实现更大的自给自足 自给自足。

4.The government is promoting self-sufficiency 自给自足 in food production to reduce dependency on imports.

政府正在推动食品生产的自给自足 自给自足，以减少对进口的依赖。

5.The concept of autarchy 自治 emphasizes a nation’s ability to be independent and self-reliant.

自治 自治的概念强调一个国家能够独立和自给自足。

作文

In today's globalized world, the concepts of self-sufficiency（自给自足） and autarky（经济自给自足） are often discussed in the context of sustainability and economic independence. While these terms may seem similar, they have distinct meanings that reflect different approaches to economic management. Self-sufficiency refers to the ability of an individual, community, or nation to fulfill its own needs without relying on external assistance. This can encompass a wide range of areas, including food production, energy generation, and even healthcare. The idea is that by being self-sufficient, one can reduce vulnerability to external shocks such as market fluctuations, natural disasters, or geopolitical tensions.On the other hand, autarky is a more extreme form of self-sufficiency. It refers specifically to an economic system where a country seeks to be entirely self-reliant, producing all the goods and services it requires without engaging in international trade. Historically, nations that have pursued autarky often did so during times of war or economic crisis, believing that isolation from global markets would protect them from foreign influence and dependency. However, this approach has significant downsides, as it can lead to inefficiencies, lack of innovation, and ultimately, a lower standard of living for the populace.Another related term is autarchy（独裁统治）, which is often confused with autarky. While autarky focuses on economic independence, autarchy refers to a political system where power is concentrated in a single authority, often leading to authoritarian governance. In such systems, the government may promote autarky as a means to bolster national pride and economic independence, but the implications for personal freedoms and democratic governance can be severe.In recent years, the push for self-sufficiency has gained traction as concerns over climate change and global supply chain vulnerabilities have come to the forefront. Many people advocate for local farming initiatives, renewable energy projects, and community-based healthcare systems that foster self-sufficiency. These efforts not only aim to reduce dependence on distant suppliers but also to enhance resilience against environmental and economic pressures.Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the risks associated with global supply chains, prompting some governments and businesses to reconsider their reliance on foreign imports. The desire for self-sufficiency in essential goods such as medical supplies and food has led to discussions about strengthening local industries and investing in domestic production capabilities.In conclusion, while self-sufficiency, autarky, and autarchy are interconnected concepts, they serve different purposes and carry different implications. Self-sufficiency promotes resilience and sustainability, allowing individuals and communities to thrive independently. In contrast, autarky presents challenges that can hinder growth and innovation, while autarchy raises concerns about the erosion of democratic values. As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, it is crucial to find a balance between self-reliance and global cooperation, ensuring that we can meet our needs while remaining connected to the broader community.

在当今全球化的世界中，自给自足（self-sufficiency）和经济自给自足（autarky）这两个概念常常在可持续性和经济独立的背景下被讨论。虽然这些术语看似相似，但它们具有不同的含义，反映了不同的经济管理方法。自给自足指的是个人、社区或国家在不依赖外部援助的情况下满足自身需求的能力。这可以涵盖广泛的领域，包括食品生产、能源生成甚至医疗保健。其理念是，通过实现自给自足，可以减少对市场波动、自然灾害或地缘政治紧张局势等外部冲击的脆弱性。另一方面，经济自给自足（autarky）是一种更加极端的自给自足形式。它特指一个国家寻求完全自给自足的经济体系，生产所有所需的商品和服务，而不参与国际贸易。历史上，追求经济自给自足的国家通常是在战争或经济危机时期，认为与全球市场的隔离将保护他们免受外部影响和依赖。然而，这种方法有显著的缺点，因为它可能导致效率低下、缺乏创新，并最终降低民众的生活水平。另一个相关术语是独裁统治（autarchy），它常常与经济自给自足混淆。虽然经济自给自足关注经济独立，但独裁统治指的是权力集中在单一权威手中的政治系统，通常导致专制治理。在这样的系统中，政府可能会推动经济自给自足，作为增强民族自豪感和经济独立的手段，但对个人自由和民主治理的影响可能是严重的。近年来，随着气候变化和全球供应链脆弱性问题的突出，推动自给自足的呼声越来越高。许多人倡导地方农业倡议、可再生能源项目和以社区为基础的医疗保健系统，以促进自给自足。这些努力不仅旨在减少对远方供应商的依赖，还旨在增强抵御环境和经济压力的韧性。此外，COVID-19大流行突显了全球供应链相关的风险，促使一些政府和企业重新考虑对外国进口的依赖。对基本商品如医疗用品和食品的自给自足的渴望，引发了关于加强地方产业和投资国内生产能力的讨论。总之，尽管自给自足、经济自给自足和独裁统治是相互关联的概念，但它们服务于不同的目的，并带有不同的含义。自给自足促进韧性和可持续性，使个人和社区能够独立繁荣。相反，经济自给自足则呈现出可能阻碍增长和创新的挑战，而独裁统治则引发了对民主价值观侵蚀的担忧。在我们应对现代世界的复杂性时，找到自我依赖与全球合作之间的平衡至关重要，确保我们能够满足我们的需求，同时保持与更广泛社区的联系。