capitalist state subsidy

简明释义

资本主义国家补助

英英释义

例句

1.The capitalist state subsidy for renewable energy projects has encouraged investment in green technologies.

对可再生能源项目的资本主义国家补贴促进了对绿色技术的投资。

2.The government introduced a new capitalist state subsidy to support local businesses affected by the pandemic.

政府推出了一项新的资本主义国家补贴，以支持受疫情影响的本地企业。

3.Critics argue that capitalist state subsidies can distort market competition and lead to inefficiencies.

批评者认为，资本主义国家补贴可能扭曲市场竞争并导致低效。

4.Many farmers rely on capitalist state subsidies to maintain their livelihoods during tough economic times.

许多农民依赖于资本主义国家补贴来维持在经济困难时期的生计。

5.In some countries, capitalist state subsidies are essential for the survival of key industries.

在一些国家，资本主义国家补贴对关键行业的生存至关重要。

作文

In the contemporary economic landscape, the term capitalist state subsidy refers to financial assistance provided by the government to private enterprises within a capitalist framework. This concept plays a crucial role in understanding how governments interact with the market economy and the implications of such interventions on competition, innovation, and overall economic growth. 资本主义国家补贴是指在资本主义框架下，政府对私营企业提供的财政援助。这个概念对于理解政府如何与市场经济互动，以及这种干预对竞争、创新和整体经济增长的影响至关重要。The rationale behind capitalist state subsidy is often rooted in the belief that certain industries or sectors are vital for national interests or economic stability. For instance, during economic downturns, governments may provide subsidies to struggling industries to prevent widespread unemployment and maintain social order. Additionally, subsidies can be aimed at fostering innovation in emerging technologies, such as renewable energy, where private investment may be insufficient due to high initial costs and uncertain returns. 资本主义国家补贴的合理性通常源于某些行业或部门对国家利益或经济稳定的重要性。例如，在经济衰退期间，政府可能会向陷入困境的行业提供补贴，以防止大规模失业并维护社会秩序。此外，补贴还可以旨在促进新兴技术领域的创新，例如可再生能源，因为由于高昂的初始成本和不确定的回报，私人投资可能不足。However, the provision of capitalist state subsidy is not without controversy. Critics argue that such subsidies can distort market competition, leading to inefficiencies and a misallocation of resources. When governments favor certain industries over others, it can create an uneven playing field, where subsidized companies can outcompete their non-subsidized counterparts, potentially driving them out of business. This raises questions about the fairness of such practices and whether they ultimately benefit consumers or merely protect inefficient businesses. 资本主义国家补贴的提供并非没有争议。批评者认为，这种补贴可能扭曲市场竞争，导致低效和资源配置不当。当政府优待某些行业而非其他行业时，可能会造成不平等的竞争环境，受补贴的公司可能会在竞争中击败未受补贴的同行，最终使它们破产。这引发了关于此类做法公平性的质疑，以及它们是否最终惠及消费者，还是仅仅保护低效企业。Moreover, the sustainability of capitalist state subsidy raises important considerations. Governments must carefully evaluate the long-term impacts of providing subsidies. While short-term benefits may be evident, such as job preservation and economic stabilization, the long-term reliance on government support can hinder innovation and competitiveness. Companies may become complacent, relying on subsidies rather than striving for efficiency and improvement. Thus, the challenge lies in finding a balance between necessary support and encouraging self-sufficiency within the capitalist system. 资本主义国家补贴的可持续性引发了重要的考量。政府必须仔细评估提供补贴的长期影响。虽然短期收益可能显而易见，例如保留就业和经济稳定，但对政府支持的长期依赖可能会阻碍创新和竞争力。公司可能会变得自满，依赖补贴而不是努力提高效率和改善。因此，挑战在于找到必要支持与鼓励资本主义体系内自给自足之间的平衡。In conclusion, the concept of capitalist state subsidy is multifaceted, encompassing both positive and negative aspects. It serves as a tool for governments to influence the economy, promote certain sectors, and address social challenges. However, the implications of such subsidies must be critically assessed to ensure that they do not undermine the very principles of capitalism they seek to support. A careful approach to implementing 资本主义国家补贴 is essential for fostering a healthy and competitive economic environment, where innovation thrives and consumers benefit from fair competition.

在当代经济格局中，术语资本主义国家补贴指的是政府在资本主义框架内向私营企业提供的财政援助。这个概念对于理解政府如何与市场经济互动，以及这种干预对竞争、创新和整体经济增长的影响至关重要。资本主义国家补贴是指在资本主义框架下，政府对私营企业提供的财政援助。这个概念对于理解政府如何与市场经济互动，以及这种干预对竞争、创新和整体经济增长的影响至关重要。资本主义国家补贴的合理性通常源于某些行业或部门对国家利益或经济稳定的重要性。例如，在经济衰退期间，政府可能会向陷入困境的行业提供补贴，以防止大规模失业并维护社会秩序。此外，补贴还可以旨在促进新兴技术领域的创新，例如可再生能源，因为由于高昂的初始成本和不确定的回报，私人投资可能不足。然而，提供资本主义国家补贴并非没有争议。批评者认为，这种补贴可能扭曲市场竞争，导致低效和资源配置不当。当政府优待某些行业而非其他行业时，可能会造成不平等的竞争环境，受补贴的公司可能会在竞争中击败未受补贴的同行，最终使它们破产。这引发了关于此类做法公平性的质疑，以及它们是否最终惠及消费者，还是仅仅保护低效企业。此外，资本主义国家补贴的可持续性引发了重要的考量。政府必须仔细评估提供补贴的长期影响。虽然短期收益可能显而易见，例如保留就业和经济稳定，但对政府支持的长期依赖可能会阻碍创新和竞争力。公司可能会变得自满，依赖补贴而不是努力提高效率和改善。因此，挑战在于找到必要支持与鼓励资本主义体系内自给自足之间的平衡。总之，资本主义国家补贴的概念是多方面的，包含了积极和消极的方面。它作为政府影响经济、促进某些部门和解决社会挑战的工具。然而，必须批判性地评估此类补贴的影响，以确保它们不会破坏它们所寻求支持的资本主义原则。对实施资本主义国家补贴采取谨慎的方法对于培育健康和竞争的经济环境至关重要，在这个环境中，创新蓬勃发展，消费者从公平竞争中受益。