quasi-contract; contract implied by law

简明释义

准合同，准契约

英英释义

例句

1.In cases of emergency services rendered without prior consent, the law may recognize a quasi-contract; contract implied by law for reimbursement.

在没有事先同意的紧急服务案例中，法律可能会承认一个准合同；法律暗示的合同以便报销。

2.If a homeowner accidentally receives a delivery of furniture intended for a neighbor, they may be required to pay for it under a quasi-contract; contract implied by law.

如果房主意外收到本应送给邻居的家具，他们可能需要根据准合同；法律暗示的合同支付费用。

3.In a situation where a person receives medical treatment while unconscious, the court may impose a quasi-contract; contract implied by law to ensure that the hospital is compensated for its services.

在一个人失去知觉接受医疗治疗的情况下，法院可能会强制施加一个准合同；法律暗示的合同，以确保医院获得服务费用的补偿。

4.A quasi-contract; contract implied by law can arise when one party mistakenly pays for a service that was meant for another party.

当一方错误地支付了本应由另一方享有的服务费用时，可以产生一个准合同；法律暗示的合同。

5.When someone provides a benefit to another party without any agreement, a quasi-contract; contract implied by law might be established to prevent unjust enrichment.

当某人无任何协议地为另一方提供利益时，可能会建立一个准合同；法律暗示的合同以防止不当得利。

作文

In the realm of law, the concept of a quasi-contract; contract implied by law plays a crucial role in ensuring fairness and justice in transactions between parties. A quasi-contract; contract implied by law is not an actual contract that arises from an agreement between two parties but rather a legal construct that the courts create to prevent unjust enrichment. This means that even if there is no formal contract in place, the law recognizes certain obligations that arise based on the circumstances surrounding a transaction.For example, consider a situation where a person receives medical treatment while unconscious and is unable to consent to the services provided. In this case, the hospital or healthcare provider cannot seek payment based on a traditional contract since the patient did not explicitly agree to the treatment. However, the law imposes a quasi-contract; contract implied by law to ensure that the healthcare provider is compensated for their services. The rationale behind this legal principle is to prevent the patient from being unjustly enriched at the expense of the service provider. Another common scenario involves the purchase of goods. Suppose a homeowner accidentally receives a delivery of furniture that they did not order. If the homeowner decides to keep the furniture, the law may impose a quasi-contract; contract implied by law requiring them to pay the fair market value for the items. This prevents the homeowner from benefiting from the mistake of the seller without compensating them in some way.The essence of a quasi-contract; contract implied by law lies in its ability to enforce fairness in situations where an actual contract does not exist. It allows the court to step in and create an obligation that reflects the intentions of the parties involved, even if those intentions were never formally articulated. This legal mechanism ensures that individuals cannot take advantage of others by reaping benefits without providing appropriate compensation.It is important to note that a quasi-contract; contract implied by law does not require mutual consent, as is typical in traditional contracts. Instead, it is based on the principle that one party should not be unjustly enriched at the expense of another. Courts will look at the facts and circumstances of each case to determine whether a quasi-contract; contract implied by law should be recognized.In conclusion, the concept of a quasi-contract; contract implied by law serves as an essential tool in the legal system to address situations where traditional contracts are absent. By imposing obligations where none exist, the law promotes fairness and prevents unjust enrichment. Understanding this concept is vital for anyone navigating legal transactions, as it highlights the importance of equity in the enforcement of rights and obligations. As society becomes increasingly complex, the role of quasi-contracts; contracts implied by law will likely continue to evolve, adapting to new challenges and ensuring that justice prevails in our interactions with one another.

在法律领域，准合同；法律暗示的合同的概念在确保交易双方的公平和正义中发挥着至关重要的作用。准合同；法律暗示的合同并不是由双方之间的协议产生的实际合同，而是法院为了防止不当得利而创造的法律构造。这意味着即使没有正式合同存在，法律也会根据交易周围的情况承认某些义务。例如，考虑一种情况，一个人在失去知觉时接受了医疗治疗，无法同意提供的服务。在这种情况下，医院或医疗服务提供者无法基于传统合同寻求付款，因为患者没有明确同意治疗。然而，法律施加了一种准合同；法律暗示的合同，以确保医疗服务提供者能够获得其服务的报酬。这一法律原则的理由是防止患者在服务提供者的损失上不当得利。另一个常见的场景涉及商品的购买。假设一个房主意外收到了一件他们没有订购的家具。如果房主决定保留这件家具，法律可能会施加一种准合同；法律暗示的合同，要求他们支付该物品的公平市场价值。这防止了房主在卖方的错误中获利而不对其进行补偿。准合同；法律暗示的合同的本质在于其在没有实际合同存在的情况下强制执行公平的能力。它允许法院介入并创建反映相关方意图的义务，即使这些意图从未正式表达。这个法律机制确保个人不能通过在没有适当补偿的情况下获得利益来利用他人。需要注意的是，准合同；法律暗示的合同并不要求像传统合同那样的相互同意。相反，它基于一个原则，即一方不应在另一方的损失上不当得利。法院将根据每个案件的事实和情况来确定是否应承认准合同；法律暗示的合同。总之，准合同；法律暗示的合同的概念作为法律体系中的一个重要工具，旨在解决缺乏传统合同的情况。通过在不存在的地方施加义务，法律促进了公平，防止了不当得利。理解这一概念对于任何在法律交易中导航的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它突显了在权利和义务的执行中公平的重要性。随着社会变得越来越复杂，准合同；法律暗示的合同的角色可能会继续发展，以适应新的挑战，确保正义在我们彼此的互动中得以实现。