examination as to patentability

简明释义

专利资料鉴定

英英释义

例句

1.The attorney recommended a thorough examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查 to avoid potential infringement issues.

律师建议进行彻底的examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查，以避免潜在的侵权问题。

2.An examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查 can help identify prior art that may affect the patent's validity.

一项examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查可以帮助识别可能影响专利有效性的现有技术。

3.Before filing a patent application, it's advisable to conduct an examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查 to ensure the invention is novel.

在提交专利申请之前，建议进行一次examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查，以确保发明是新颖的。

4.Companies often perform an examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查 during their R&D phase to assess the feasibility of their inventions.

公司在研发阶段通常会进行examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查以评估其发明的可行性。

5.Investors often look for a positive examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查 report before funding a startup.

投资者通常希望在为初创公司提供资金之前，获得一份积极的examination as to patentability 关于专利性的审查报告。

作文

The process of obtaining a patent is crucial for inventors and innovators who wish to protect their intellectual property. One significant aspect of this process is the examination as to patentability, which refers to the thorough assessment conducted by a patent office to determine whether an invention meets the necessary criteria for patent protection. This examination is vital because it ensures that only inventions that are truly novel, non-obvious, and useful are granted patents. To begin with, the examination process typically starts with a detailed application submitted by the inventor. This application must include a comprehensive description of the invention, claims that define the scope of protection sought, and any relevant drawings or diagrams. Once the application is filed, it enters the queue for examination as to patentability, where a patent examiner reviews it against existing patents, scientific literature, and other public disclosures. The examiner's goal is to ascertain whether the invention is indeed new and not simply a reiteration of what has already been invented. The first criterion assessed during the examination as to patentability is novelty. An invention must be new, meaning it cannot have been disclosed to the public in any form before the filing date of the patent application. If the examiner finds any prior art that discloses the same or a similar invention, the application may be rejected on the grounds of lack of novelty. This is why conducting a thorough patent search before filing is often recommended for inventors.Next, the examiner evaluates the non-obviousness of the invention. This means that even if an invention is new, it must also be sufficiently different from existing inventions that it would not be obvious to a person skilled in the relevant field. For example, if an inventor creates a new type of bicycle that incorporates a feature that is already widely known in another context, the examiner may determine that the invention is obvious and thus unpatentable. This aspect of the examination as to patentability serves to prevent the patenting of trivial improvements that do not contribute significantly to the field. Another critical element considered during the examination as to patentability is the usefulness of the invention. The examiner must be convinced that the invention has a specific, substantial, and credible utility. If the invention appears to be merely theoretical or lacks practical application, it may be deemed unpatentable. This criterion ensures that patents are granted only for inventions that can genuinely benefit society.In conclusion, the examination as to patentability is a fundamental step in the patent application process that determines whether an invention qualifies for patent protection. By rigorously evaluating the novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness of an invention, patent examiners play an essential role in maintaining the integrity of the patent system. For inventors, understanding this process is crucial, as it not only affects their ability to secure patents but also influences their strategies for innovation and market entry. Ultimately, the examination as to patentability serves to foster a competitive environment that encourages creativity while protecting the rights of inventors.

获得专利的过程对希望保护其知识产权的发明者和创新者至关重要。这个过程中的一个重要方面是专利性审查，指的是专利局进行的全面评估，以确定某项发明是否符合专利保护所需的标准。这项审查至关重要，因为它确保只有真正新颖、非显而易见且有用的发明才能获得专利。首先，审查过程通常从发明者提交详细申请开始。该申请必须包括对发明的全面描述、定义所寻求保护范围的权利要求以及任何相关的图纸或示意图。一旦申请提交，它就进入了专利性审查的队列，在这里，专利审查员会将其与现有专利、科学文献和其他公开披露进行比较。审查员的目标是确定该发明是否确实是新的，而不仅仅是已有发明的重述。在专利性审查过程中，首先评估的标准是新颖性。一项发明必须是新的，这意味着在专利申请的提交日期之前不能以任何形式向公众披露。如果审查员发现任何披露相同或类似发明的先前技术，申请可能会因缺乏新颖性而被拒绝。因此，许多发明者在申请专利之前通常会建议进行彻底的专利检索。接下来，审查员评估发明的非显而易见性。这意味着，即使一项发明是新的，它也必须与现有发明有足够的区别，以至于对相关领域的技术人员来说并不显而易见。例如，如果一位发明者创造了一种新型自行车，包含已经在其他背景下广为人知的特征，审查员可能会认为该发明是显而易见的，因此不可专利。这一专利性审查的方面旨在防止对没有显著贡献的微不足道改进进行专利。在专利性审查过程中，还考虑了发明的实用性。审查员必须确信该发明具有特定、实质和可信的效用。如果该发明似乎仅仅是理论上的或缺乏实际应用，可能会被视为不可专利。这一标准确保只有对社会真正有益的发明才能获得专利。总之，专利性审查是专利申请过程中一个基本步骤，决定了发明是否符合专利保护的资格。通过严格评估发明的新颖性、非显而易见性和实用性，专利审查员在维护专利制度的完整性方面发挥着重要作用。对于发明者来说，理解这一过程至关重要，因为它不仅影响他们获得专利的能力，还影响他们的创新和市场进入策略。最终，专利性审查促进了鼓励创造力的竞争环境，同时保护了发明者的权益。