article-by-article bargaining

简明释义

逐项商品谈判

英英释义

例句

1.During the negotiations, the team decided to use article-by-article bargaining to address each point in detail.

在谈判过程中，团队决定采用逐条协商的方法详细处理每个要点。

2.The contract was revised through article-by-article bargaining, allowing for more precise amendments.

合同通过逐条协商的方式进行了修订，使得修正更加精确。

3.By utilizing article-by-article bargaining, both parties managed to reach a consensus on several contentious issues.

通过采用逐条协商的方法，双方成功就几个有争议的问题达成共识。

4.In complex negotiations, article-by-article bargaining can help clarify misunderstandings between parties.

在复杂的谈判中，逐条协商可以帮助澄清各方之间的误解。

5.The union representatives preferred article-by-article bargaining to ensure every clause was thoroughly discussed.

工会代表更喜欢采用逐条协商的方法，以确保每一条款都得到充分讨论。

作文

In the realm of negotiations, whether in business, politics, or international relations, the method of article-by-article bargaining plays a crucial role. This approach entails discussing and resolving each individual article or point of contention separately, rather than trying to negotiate all issues simultaneously. The significance of this method lies in its ability to foster clarity and understanding among parties involved. By breaking down complex agreements into manageable parts, negotiators can focus on one issue at a time, ensuring that each aspect is thoroughly examined and addressed.One of the primary advantages of article-by-article bargaining is that it minimizes confusion. In large-scale negotiations, it is common for multiple issues to overlap, leading to misunderstandings. When parties tackle each article individually, they can clarify their positions and intentions without the noise of other unrelated issues. For instance, in a labor negotiation, discussing wages as a separate article allows both employers and employees to express their viewpoints without the distraction of benefits or working conditions, which can be discussed later.Moreover, this method encourages collaboration. When negotiators work through each article, they often find common ground more easily. For example, during a peace treaty negotiation, focusing on the demilitarization of a specific region first may lead to compromises that benefit both sides. Once trust is established through the resolution of one article, it can pave the way for smoother discussions on subsequent points. This sequential approach can transform adversarial negotiations into cooperative problem-solving sessions.However, article-by-article bargaining is not without its challenges. One potential drawback is that it can prolong the negotiation process. As each article is negotiated separately, it may take longer to reach an overall agreement, especially if there are many articles to discuss. This can be particularly frustrating in time-sensitive situations where quick resolutions are necessary. Additionally, parties may become entrenched in their positions on individual articles, making it difficult to reach a comprehensive agreement.Another challenge arises when the interdependence of articles is significant. In some cases, the resolution of one article may depend heavily on the outcomes of others. For example, in a trade agreement, tariff reductions (one article) might be contingent upon commitments in environmental regulations (another article). If negotiators address these issues independently, they risk creating inconsistencies that could undermine the entire agreement. Therefore, while article-by-article bargaining can be effective, negotiators must remain aware of how different articles relate to one another.In conclusion, the method of article-by-article bargaining offers both advantages and challenges in negotiation contexts. Its ability to simplify complex discussions and promote collaboration makes it a valuable strategy. However, negotiators must be mindful of the potential pitfalls, such as prolonged timelines and the interdependence of issues. Ultimately, successful negotiations often require a balance between focused discussions on individual articles and an awareness of the broader context in which these articles exist. By mastering this approach, negotiators can enhance their effectiveness and achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.

在谈判的领域，无论是在商业、政治还是国际关系中，逐条协商的方法都扮演着至关重要的角色。这种方法涉及到逐个讨论和解决每一项单独的条款或争议点，而不是试图同时谈判所有问题。这种方法的重要性在于它能够促进参与各方之间的清晰和理解。通过将复杂的协议分解为可管理的部分，谈判者可以一次专注于一个问题，确保每个方面都得到充分审查和处理。逐条协商的主要优势之一是它减少了混淆。在大规模的谈判中，多个问题重叠是很常见的，这会导致误解。当各方单独处理每个条款时，他们可以在没有其他无关问题干扰的情况下澄清自己的立场和意图。例如，在劳动谈判中，将工资作为一个单独的条款进行讨论，可以让雇主和员工表达他们的观点，而不受福利或工作条件的干扰，这些可以稍后再讨论。此外，这种方法还鼓励合作。当谈判者逐条处理时，他们往往能更容易找到共同点。例如，在和平条约谈判中，首先关注某个特定地区的非军事化可能会导致双方都能受益的妥协。一旦通过解决一个条款建立了信任，就可以为后续条款的顺利讨论铺平道路。这种顺序的方法可以将对抗性的谈判转变为合作的问题解决会议。然而，逐条协商并非没有挑战。一个潜在的缺点是它可能延长谈判过程。由于每个条款是单独协商的，达成整体协议可能需要更长的时间，特别是在有许多条款需要讨论的情况下。这在时间紧迫的情况下尤其令人沮丧，因为快速解决是必要的。此外，各方可能在单个条款上固执己见，使得达成全面协议变得困难。当条款之间的相互依赖性很大时，另一个挑战就出现了。在某些情况下，一个条款的解决可能严重依赖于其他条款的结果。例如，在贸易协议中，关税减免（一个条款）可能取决于环境法规的承诺（另一个条款）。如果谈判者独立地处理这些问题，他们可能会冒着造成不一致的风险，从而破坏整个协议。因此，尽管逐条协商可能有效，谈判者仍需意识到不同条款之间的关系。总之，逐条协商的方法在谈判背景中提供了优势和挑战。它简化复杂讨论和促进合作的能力使其成为一种有价值的策略。然而，谈判者必须注意潜在的陷阱，例如延长的时间表和问题之间的相互依赖性。最终，成功的谈判往往需要在集中讨论个别条款与对这些条款存在的更广泛背景的意识之间取得平衡。通过掌握这种方法，谈判者可以提高他们的有效性，并实现互利的结果。