executive authority; executive power

简明释义

执行权

英英释义

例句

1.Legislation often limits the executive authority of government officials to prevent abuse of power.

立法通常限制政府官员的行政权力以防止滥用权力。

2.The CEO's executive power enables him to make crucial business decisions without board approval.

首席执行官的行政权力使他能够在没有董事会批准的情况下做出关键商业决策。

3.The governor exercised his executive authority to declare a state of emergency in response to the natural disaster.

州长行使了他的行政权力，以应对自然灾害宣布紧急状态。

4.In many countries, the executive power is vested in the cabinet, led by the prime minister.

在许多国家，行政权力掌握在内阁手中，由总理领导。

5.The president holds the executive authority, which allows him to enforce laws and make key decisions.

总统拥有行政权力，这使他能够执行法律并做出关键决策。

作文

The concept of executive authority; executive power is fundamental to understanding the structure and function of government. In democratic systems, this power is typically vested in a president or prime minister, who is responsible for implementing laws and overseeing the administration of the state. The executive authority; executive power allows these leaders to make decisions that affect the daily lives of citizens, manage public resources, and respond to crises. In many countries, the executive authority; executive power is balanced by legislative and judicial branches, creating a system of checks and balances. This ensures that no single entity has absolute power, which is crucial for maintaining democratic principles. For example, in the United States, the president holds executive authority; executive power, but Congress can override vetoes and the Supreme Court can rule executive actions unconstitutional. This interplay between branches is essential for upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights.Moreover, the scope of executive authority; executive power can vary significantly depending on the political context. In some countries, leaders may possess substantial powers, including the ability to issue decrees or declare states of emergency. In contrast, other nations may have more limited executive authority; executive power, requiring broader consensus for significant actions. This variation often reflects historical developments, cultural values, and the specific challenges faced by each nation.The exercise of executive authority; executive power also raises important ethical considerations. Leaders must navigate complex issues such as national security, economic stability, and social justice while respecting the rights and freedoms of individuals. The decisions made under this power can have far-reaching consequences, influencing everything from international relations to domestic policies. Thus, accountability mechanisms are vital to ensure that those in power act in the best interest of the public.In recent years, we have witnessed instances where executive authority; executive power has been challenged. Movements advocating for transparency and accountability have gained momentum, pushing leaders to justify their actions and decisions. Citizens increasingly demand that those in power operate with integrity and uphold democratic values. This shift reflects a growing awareness of the importance of civic engagement and the role of the populace in holding leaders accountable.In conclusion, understanding executive authority; executive power is essential for grasping how governments operate and the implications of leadership decisions. It encompasses a range of responsibilities and challenges that require careful consideration and ethical judgment. As societies evolve, the nature and perception of executive authority; executive power will continue to develop, highlighting the need for vigilance and active participation in the democratic process. By fostering a culture of accountability and transparency, citizens can help ensure that executive authority; executive power is exercised responsibly and in the public interest.

“行政权力”这一概念对理解政府的结构和功能至关重要。在民主制度中，这种权力通常归于总统或首相，他们负责实施法律并监督国家的行政管理。“行政权力”使这些领导者能够做出影响公民日常生活的决策，管理公共资源，并应对危机。在许多国家，“行政权力”与立法和司法部门之间形成了平衡，创建了制衡体系。这确保没有单一实体拥有绝对权力，这对维护民主原则至关重要。例如，在美国，总统拥有“行政权力”，但国会可以推翻否决，最高法院可以裁定行政行动违宪。这种部门之间的相互作用对于维护法治和保护个人权利是必不可少的。此外，“行政权力”的范围可能因政治背景而异。在一些国家，领导者可能拥有相当大的权力，包括发布法令或宣布紧急状态的能力。相比之下，其他国家可能有更有限的“行政权力”，需要更广泛的共识才能采取重大行动。这种差异通常反映了历史发展、文化价值观和每个国家面临的具体挑战。行使“行政权力”还引发了重要的伦理考虑。领导者必须在国家安全、经济稳定和社会正义等复杂问题之间取得平衡，同时尊重个人的权利和自由。在这一权力下做出的决策可能会产生深远的后果，影响从国际关系到国内政策的方方面面。因此，问责机制对于确保掌权者以公众最佳利益行事至关重要。近年来，我们目睹了“行政权力”受到挑战的实例。倡导透明度和问责制的运动势头不断增强，推动领导者为其行动和决策提供合理解释。公民越来越要求掌权者以诚信行事，维护民主价值观。这一转变反映了对公民参与重要性的日益认识，以及公众在追究领导者责任中的作用。总之，理解“行政权力”对于把握政府运作及领导决策的影响至关重要。它涵盖了一系列责任和挑战，需要仔细考虑和道德判断。随着社会的发展，“行政权力”的性质和认知将继续演变，突显出在民主过程中保持警惕和积极参与的必要性。通过培养问责和透明的文化，公民可以帮助确保“行政权力”得到负责任地行使，并符合公众利益。