cheap government

简明释义

支出节约的政府

英英释义

例句

1.Critics argue that a cheap government 廉价政府 approach to education can lead to a decline in quality.

批评者认为，廉价政府 廉价政府对教育的处理方式可能导致质量下降。

2.Many citizens are frustrated with the cheap government 廉价政府 services that fail to meet their basic needs.

许多公民对无法满足基本需求的廉价政府 廉价政府服务感到沮丧。

3.In times of economic hardship, many people resort to cheap government 廉价政府 programs to survive.

在经济困难时期，许多人依靠廉价政府 廉价政府项目来生存。

4.The cheap government 廉价政府 initiative aimed to provide affordable housing for low-income families.

该廉价政府 廉价政府倡议旨在为低收入家庭提供负担得起的住房。

5.The opposition party criticized the current administration for its cheap government 廉价政府 policies that cut essential funding.

反对党批评当前政府因其削减必要资金的廉价政府 廉价政府政策。

作文

The concept of a cheap government refers to a system where the government operates with minimal expenditure and provides basic services at lower costs. While this may sound appealing to taxpayers who wish to see less of their money spent on bureaucracy, it raises important questions about the quality and effectiveness of governance. A cheap government can often lead to underfunded public services, which may negatively impact education, healthcare, and infrastructure. In many countries, the idea of a cheap government has gained traction due to the increasing demand for fiscal responsibility. Citizens are becoming more aware of how their tax dollars are spent and are calling for transparency and accountability. However, this push for a leaner government can sometimes result in cuts to essential services. For instance, if a government decides to reduce funding for public schools to save money, it could lead to larger class sizes and fewer resources for students. Similarly, a cheap government might cut back on healthcare services, resulting in longer wait times and reduced access to care for citizens. Moreover, a cheap government can also struggle to attract and retain talented public servants. When salaries are low and resources are scarce, it becomes challenging to recruit qualified individuals who can effectively manage public programs. This can create a cycle where the quality of governance declines, leading to even more calls for a cheap government, further exacerbating the issue. On the other hand, proponents of a cheap government argue that it fosters innovation and efficiency. By operating on a tighter budget, governments may be forced to find creative solutions to problems and prioritize essential services. For example, some municipalities have embraced technology to streamline operations and reduce costs, ultimately improving service delivery without increasing spending. However, the challenge lies in finding the right balance between cost-cutting measures and maintaining quality public services. A truly effective government should not only focus on being cheap but also on being efficient and responsive to the needs of its citizens. It is essential for governments to assess their priorities and ensure that any efforts to reduce costs do not come at the expense of the well-being of the population. In conclusion, while the idea of a cheap government may appeal to those who wish to see lower taxes and reduced government spending, it is crucial to consider the potential consequences. A government that operates too cheaply risks undermining the very services that are vital for a healthy and functioning society. Striking a balance between fiscal responsibility and quality governance is essential for ensuring that citizens receive the services they need without compromising on effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a government that is not only cheap but also capable, accountable, and committed to serving the public good.

‘廉价政府’的概念指的是一种以最低支出运作的政府体系，提供基本服务且成本较低。虽然这对希望看到更少税款用于官僚机构的纳税人来说听起来很有吸引力，但它也引发了关于治理质量和有效性的重要问题。‘廉价政府’往往导致公共服务资金不足，这可能对教育、医疗和基础设施产生负面影响。在许多国家，‘廉价政府’的理念因对财政责任的日益需求而获得关注。公民越来越意识到他们的税款如何被使用，并呼吁透明度和问责制。然而，这种对精简政府的推动有时会导致对基本服务的削减。例如，如果政府决定减少对公立学校的资金，以节省开支，可能会导致班级规模增大和学生资源减少。同样，‘廉价政府’可能会削减医疗服务，导致市民等待时间延长和获得医疗服务的机会减少。此外，‘廉价政府’还可能难以吸引和留住优秀的公务员。当薪水低且资源稀缺时，招聘能够有效管理公共项目的合格人员变得具有挑战性。这可能造成一个循环，治理质量下降，导致对‘廉价政府’的更多呼声，进一步加剧问题。另一方面，‘廉价政府’的支持者认为，它促进了创新和效率。通过在更紧张的预算下运作，政府可能被迫寻求创造性解决方案并优先考虑基本服务。例如，一些市政当局已经采用技术来简化操作和降低成本，最终提高了服务交付而不增加支出。然而，挑战在于找到削减成本措施与维护公共服务质量之间的正确平衡。一个真正有效的政府不仅应关注‘廉价’，还应关注高效和响应公民需求。政府必须评估其优先事项，确保任何降低成本的努力都不会以牺牲公众福祉为代价。总之，虽然‘廉价政府’的理念可能吸引那些希望看到降低税收和减少政府支出的人士，但考虑潜在后果至关重要。一个运作过于廉价的政府风险破坏对健康和正常运作社会至关重要的服务。实现财政责任与优质治理之间的平衡对于确保公民获得所需服务而不妥协于有效性至关重要。最终目标应该是创造一个不仅‘廉价’，而且能够、负责任并致力于服务公众利益的政府。