fiscal monopoly

简明释义

政府专卖

英英释义

例句

1.In some countries, the government holds a fiscal monopoly 财政垄断 on essential services like water and electricity.

在一些国家，政府对水电等基本服务拥有fiscal monopoly 财政垄断。

2.The fiscal monopoly 财政垄断 over gambling in the state has created a controlled environment for players.

该州对赌博的fiscal monopoly 财政垄断创造了一个受控的环境供玩家使用。

3.Many argue that the fiscal monopoly 财政垄断 on currency issuance leads to inflation and economic instability.

许多人认为，货币发行的fiscal monopoly 财政垄断导致通货膨胀和经济不稳定。

4.The fiscal monopoly 财政垄断 on public transportation ensures that all citizens have access to affordable travel options.

公共交通的fiscal monopoly 财政垄断确保所有公民都能获得负担得起的出行选择。

5.The government has established a fiscal monopoly 财政垄断 on tobacco sales to regulate consumption and generate revenue.

政府在烟草销售上建立了一个fiscal monopoly 财政垄断，以调节消费并产生收入。

作文

A fiscal monopoly refers to a situation where a single entity, typically the government or a state-owned enterprise, has exclusive control over the collection of taxes and the management of public finances within a certain jurisdiction. This concept is crucial in understanding how governments fund their operations and provide services to citizens. In many countries, especially those with centralized economies, the fiscal monopoly allows the state to maintain a strong grip on economic activities and resource allocation.The implications of a fiscal monopoly are profound. On one hand, it can lead to efficient tax collection and streamlined government spending. When the government is the only entity responsible for fiscal matters, it can implement policies that directly align with national interests. For instance, during times of economic crisis, a government with a fiscal monopoly can quickly mobilize resources to stimulate the economy by increasing public spending or adjusting tax rates.However, there are significant drawbacks to this system. A fiscal monopoly can result in inefficiencies and lack of accountability. Without competition, there is little incentive for the government to optimize its tax collection methods or manage public funds effectively. Furthermore, when citizens feel that they have no say in how public finances are managed, it can lead to disillusionment and a lack of trust in government institutions.In addition, a fiscal monopoly can stifle innovation in public finance. In a competitive environment, different entities might propose alternative methods for tax collection or public expenditure, potentially leading to better outcomes for society. Conversely, a monopoly may become complacent, relying on outdated practices that do not meet the evolving needs of the population.The balance between the advantages and disadvantages of a fiscal monopoly is delicate. Some argue that certain aspects of fiscal management should remain under government control to ensure equity and fairness in taxation. Others advocate for a more decentralized approach, suggesting that local governments or private entities could handle specific financial responsibilities more efficiently.Ultimately, the effectiveness of a fiscal monopoly depends on the governance structures in place. Transparency and accountability mechanisms are essential to ensure that the government acts in the best interests of its citizens. Public engagement in fiscal matters, such as budget discussions and tax policy formulation, can help bridge the gap between the government and the populace, fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility.In conclusion, the concept of fiscal monopoly plays a pivotal role in shaping the economic landscape of a nation. It determines how resources are allocated, how public services are funded, and ultimately, how citizens experience the impact of government policies. While it offers certain efficiencies, it is vital to continuously assess its effectiveness and ensure that the government remains responsive to the needs of the people it serves. Only through such scrutiny can we hope to create a fiscal environment that promotes growth, equity, and public trust.

“财政垄断”指的是一种情况，通常是政府或国有企业在特定管辖区内对税收的征收和公共财政的管理拥有独占控制权。这个概念对于理解政府如何资助其运作和向公民提供服务至关重要。在许多国家，尤其是那些拥有集中经济体制的国家，“财政垄断”使国家能够对经济活动和资源分配保持强有力的控制。“财政垄断”的影响深远。一方面，它可以导致高效的税收征集和精简的政府支出。当政府是唯一负责财政事务的实体时，它可以实施与国家利益直接对齐的政策。例如，在经济危机时期，拥有“财政垄断”的政府可以迅速动员资源，通过增加公共支出或调整税率来刺激经济。然而，这种制度也存在显著的缺点。“财政垄断”可能导致低效率和缺乏问责制。在没有竞争的情况下，政府几乎没有动力优化其税收征集方法或有效管理公共资金。此外，当公民感到自己对公共财政的管理没有发言权时，可能会导致失望和对政府机构的不信任。此外，“财政垄断”可能抑制公共财政的创新。在竞争环境中，不同的实体可能会提出替代的税收征集或公共支出方法，从而潜在地为社会带来更好的结果。相反，垄断可能变得自满，依赖于不符合人口不断变化需求的过时做法。“财政垄断”的优缺点之间的平衡非常微妙。有些人认为，财政管理的某些方面应保持在政府控制之下，以确保税收的公平性和公正性。另一些人则主张采取更分散的方法，建议地方政府或私营实体可以更有效地处理特定的财政责任。最终，“财政垄断”的有效性取决于所建立的治理结构。透明度和问责机制对于确保政府以公民的最佳利益行事至关重要。在财政事务中，公众参与，例如预算讨论和税收政策制定，可以帮助弥合政府与民众之间的差距，培养归属感和责任感。总之，“财政垄断”的概念在塑造国家经济格局中发挥着关键作用。它决定了资源的分配方式、公共服务的资金来源，以及最终公民如何体验政府政策的影响。虽然它提供了一定的效率，但持续评估其有效性并确保政府对其服务的人民的需求保持响应至关重要。只有通过这样的审查，我们才能希望创造一个促进增长、公平和公众信任的财政环境。