appropriation of labor power

简明释义

占用劳动

英英释义

例句

1.The debate around the appropriation of labor power 劳动能力的占有 continues to shape labor laws worldwide.

围绕劳动能力的占有的辩论继续影响全球的劳动法。

2.In many industries, the appropriation of labor power 劳动能力的占有 is often justified by the need for efficiency.

在许多行业中，劳动能力的占有往往以提高效率的需要为理由。

3.The company's appropriation of labor power 劳动能力的占有 has led to increased profits, but at the cost of employee morale.

公司的劳动能力的占有导致了利润的增加，但以员工士气为代价。

4.Workers are increasingly aware of the appropriation of labor power 劳动能力的占有 and are demanding fair compensation.

工人们越来越意识到劳动能力的占有，并要求公平的报酬。

5.The appropriation of labor power 劳动能力的占有 can lead to exploitation if not regulated properly.

如果没有适当的监管，劳动能力的占有可能导致剥削。

作文

The concept of appropriation of labor power is central to understanding the dynamics of labor relations and economic systems. In essence, it refers to the process by which capitalists or employers extract value from the labor provided by workers. This extraction is not merely a transaction; it is a complex interplay of social, economic, and political forces that shape the conditions under which labor is performed. The appropriation of labor power can be seen as a mechanism through which wealth is generated and distributed in society. To delve deeper into this concept, we must first recognize that labor power is not just the physical ability to work; it encompasses the skills, knowledge, and creativity that workers bring to their jobs. When an employer hires a worker, they are essentially purchasing the right to utilize that worker's labor power for a specific period. However, the value created during this time often exceeds the wages paid to the worker. This surplus value is what capitalists seek to appropriate. Historically, the appropriation of labor power has taken various forms, from feudal systems where lords extracted labor from serfs, to modern corporate environments where employees are compensated with salaries and benefits. In each case, the fundamental relationship remains the same: those who own the means of production have the power to dictate the terms under which labor is performed. This relationship can lead to significant disparities in wealth and power between employers and employees.One critical aspect of the appropriation of labor power is the notion of exploitation. Exploitation occurs when workers do not receive a fair share of the value they create. This can happen in several ways: through low wages, poor working conditions, or lack of job security. The struggle for better wages and working conditions is often framed as a fight against the unjust appropriation of labor power. Labor movements and unions have historically emerged as a response to these exploitative practices, advocating for the rights of workers and striving to ensure that they receive a fair share of the wealth they help create.In contemporary discussions about the appropriation of labor power, issues such as automation and gig economy jobs have become increasingly relevant. As technology advances, many traditional jobs are being replaced by machines, leading to concerns about job security and the future of work. Gig economy workers often face precarious employment conditions, lacking benefits and protections that were once standard in traditional employment. This raises important questions about how labor power is appropriated in these new contexts and whether workers are receiving adequate compensation for their contributions.Ultimately, understanding the appropriation of labor power requires us to critically examine the structures of our economic systems and the relationships between different classes in society. It challenges us to consider how we can create a more equitable distribution of wealth and power, ensuring that all workers are recognized and rewarded for their contributions. The ongoing discourse surrounding labor rights, fair wages, and social justice is deeply intertwined with the concept of appropriation of labor power, highlighting its relevance in both historical and contemporary contexts.

“劳动能力的占有”这一概念在理解劳动关系和经济体系的动态中至关重要。 本质上，它指的是资本家或雇主从工人提供的劳动中提取价值的过程。 这种提取不仅仅是一种交易； 它是塑造劳动执行条件的社会、经济和政治力量之间复杂的相互作用。 “劳动能力的占有”可以看作是社会中财富生成和分配的一种机制。要深入了解这个概念，我们首先必须认识到，劳动能力不仅仅是工作的身体能力； 它包括工人带到工作中的技能、知识和创造力。 当雇主雇用工人时，他们本质上是在购买在特定时间内利用该工人劳动能力的权利。 然而，在此期间创造的价值往往超过支付给工人的工资。 这种剩余价值正是资本家试图占有的东西。历史上，“劳动能力的占有”采取了各种形式，从封建制度下的领主对农奴的劳动提取，到现代企业环境中员工获得薪水和福利。在每一种情况下，基本关系保持不变：那些拥有生产资料的人有权决定劳动执行的条件。这种关系可能导致雇主和雇员之间财富和权力的重大差异。“劳动能力的占有”的一个关键方面是剥削的概念。 当工人没有获得他们创造的价值的公平份额时，就会发生剥削。 这可能通过几种方式发生：低工资、恶劣的工作条件或缺乏工作保障。 为了更好的工资和工作条件的斗争通常被框架为反对不公正的劳动能力占有的斗争。 劳动运动和工会历史上作为对这些剥削性实践的回应而出现，倡导工人的权利，并努力确保他们获得所创造财富的公平份额。在当代关于“劳动能力的占有”的讨论中，自动化和零工经济工作等问题变得越来越相关。 随着技术的进步，许多传统工作被机器取代，导致人们对工作安全和未来的担忧。 零工经济工人往往面临不稳定的就业条件，缺乏曾经在传统就业中标准的福利和保护。 这引发了有关在这些新背景下如何占有劳动能力以及工人是否为他们的贡献获得适当补偿的重要问题。最终，理解“劳动能力的占有”要求我们批判性地审视我们经济体系的结构以及社会中不同阶级之间的关系。 它挑战我们思考如何创造更公平的财富和权力分配，确保所有工人都能因其贡献而受到认可和奖励。 关于劳动权利、公平工资和社会正义的持续话语与“劳动能力的占有”这一概念密切相关，突显了它在历史和当代背景中的相关性。