inerrancy

简明释义

[ɪnˈerənsi][ɪnˈerənsi]

n. 无差错;绝对正确

英英释义

The doctrine that the Bible is without error in its teachings and assertions.

一种信念,即圣经在其教义和主张中没有错误。

单词用法

doctrine of inerrancy

无误性教义

inerrancy of scripture

圣经的无误性

assert the inerrancy

主张无误性

challenge the inerrancy

质疑无误性

inerrancy of the bible

圣经的无误性

defense of inerrancy

对无误性的辩护

historical inerrancy

历史无误性

theological inerrancy

神学无误性

同义词

infalibility

无误性

The inerrancy of the text is crucial for theological discussions.

文本的无误性对神学讨论至关重要。

accuracy

准确性

Many scholars debate the infallibility of historical documents.

许多学者辩论历史文献的无误性。

truthfulness

真实可靠性

The accuracy of the data collected was verified by multiple sources.

收集的数据的准确性得到了多个来源的验证。

correctness

正确性

The truthfulness of the testimony was questioned in court.

证词的真实可靠性在法庭上受到质疑。

反义词

error

错误

The report was full of errors that needed to be corrected.

这份报告充满了需要纠正的错误。

fallibility

可能出错性

Human fallibility means that we cannot always rely on our memories.

人类的可能出错性意味着我们不能总是依赖我们的记忆。

inaccuracy

不准确

The inaccuracy of the data led to flawed conclusions.

数据的不准确导致了错误的结论。

例句

1.The doctrine of inerrancy (无误性) asserts that the scriptures are free from error in all their teachings.

无误性(inerrancy)的教义主张,圣经在其所有教导中都是没有错误的。

2.In discussions about faith, the inerrancy (无误性) of religious texts often comes up as a key point.

在关于信仰的讨论中,宗教文本的无误性(inerrancy)常常成为一个关键点。

3.The belief in inerrancy (无误性) is a cornerstone for many conservative Christian denominations.

无误性(inerrancy)的信仰是许多保守基督教派的基石。

4.Many theologians debate the concept of inerrancy (无误性) in relation to biblical texts.

许多神学家讨论关于圣经文本的无误性inerrancy)这一概念。

5.Critics of inerrancy (无误性) argue that historical and cultural contexts affect the interpretation of religious texts.

批评无误性(inerrancy)的人认为,历史和文化背景影响宗教文本的解读。

作文

The concept of inerrancy plays a crucial role in many religious and philosophical discussions, particularly within the context of biblical interpretation. In essence, inerrancy refers to the belief that certain texts, especially sacred scriptures, are without error or fault in their teachings and assertions. This notion is not merely a matter of faith; it has significant implications for how followers understand their beliefs and how they engage with the world around them.For many Christians, the Bible is viewed as the ultimate authority on moral and spiritual matters. The doctrine of inerrancy asserts that the Scriptures are completely true in everything they affirm, whether that pertains to historical events, scientific facts, or moral directives. This belief provides a foundation for faith, as adherents can trust that the teachings of the Bible are reliable and applicable to their lives. However, this stance is not without controversy.Critics of inerrancy argue that such a rigid view can lead to dogmatism and an unwillingness to engage with differing perspectives. They contend that the Bible was written in a specific historical and cultural context, and thus, interpreting its messages requires careful consideration of these factors. Furthermore, some scholars point out that various translations and interpretations of biblical texts can introduce discrepancies, challenging the claim of absolute truth.Despite these criticisms, proponents of inerrancy maintain that the core messages of the Bible remain intact, regardless of linguistic or cultural shifts. They argue that the divine inspiration of the Scriptures ensures that the essential truths are preserved. This belief fosters a sense of unity among believers, as they rally around a common understanding of their sacred texts.Moreover, the doctrine of inerrancy encourages a deep engagement with the Bible. Many believers dedicate themselves to studying the Scriptures, seeking to uncover the layers of meaning within the text. This process often involves prayer, reflection, and discussion within community settings, where individuals can share insights and interpretations.In addition to its theological implications, inerrancy also intersects with broader societal issues. For instance, debates surrounding morality and ethics are often influenced by interpretations of biblical texts. When individuals assert that certain moral principles are grounded in the inerrant word of God, it shapes discussions on topics such as marriage, sexuality, and social justice.As society continues to evolve, the conversation surrounding inerrancy remains dynamic. New generations of believers are increasingly confronted with diverse viewpoints and scientific discoveries that challenge traditional interpretations of Scripture. This reality invites ongoing dialogue about the nature of truth and the relevance of ancient texts in contemporary life.In conclusion, inerrancy is a complex and multifaceted concept that significantly impacts the faith and practices of many religious communities. While it offers a framework for understanding the Bible as a trustworthy guide, it also raises important questions about interpretation, context, and the nature of truth. As believers navigate these challenges, the dialogue surrounding inerrancy will undoubtedly continue to evolve, reflecting the dynamic interplay between faith and reason in an ever-changing world.

“无误性”这一概念在许多宗教和哲学讨论中发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在圣经解释的背景下。简单来说,“无误性”是指某些文本,尤其是神圣经典,在其教义和主张上没有错误或缺陷的信念。这一概念不仅仅是信仰的问题;它对信徒如何理解自己的信仰以及如何与周围世界互动具有重要的影响。对于许多基督徒来说,《圣经》被视为道德和精神事务的终极权威。“无误性”的教义主张,圣经在它所肯定的一切方面都是完全真实的,无论涉及历史事件、科学事实还是道德指令。这一信念为信仰提供了基础,因为信徒可以信任《圣经》的教义是可靠的,并适用于他们的生活。然而,这种立场并非没有争议。批评“无误性”的人认为,这种僵化的观点可能导致教条主义和不愿意接纳不同的观点。他们辩称,《圣经》是在特定的历史和文化背景下写成的,因此,解读其信息需要仔细考虑这些因素。此外,一些学者指出,不同的翻译和对圣经文本的解释可能会引入差异,从而挑战绝对真理的主张。尽管存在这些批评,“无误性”的支持者仍然坚持,圣经的核心信息无论语言或文化的变化而保持不变。他们认为,《圣经》的神圣启示确保了基本真理的保存。这一信念在信徒之间培养了一种团结感,因为他们围绕对其神圣文本的共同理解而团结在一起。此外,“无误性”这一教义还鼓励人们深入研究《圣经》。许多信徒致力于学习圣经,试图揭示文本中的意义层次。这一过程通常涉及祈祷、反思和在社区环境中的讨论,在那里个人可以分享见解和解释。除了其神学影响外,“无误性”还与更广泛的社会问题相交叉。例如,围绕道德和伦理的辩论常常受到对圣经文本的解释的影响。当个人主张某些道德原则源于上帝无误的话语时,这将影响关于婚姻、性别和社会正义等主题的讨论。随着社会的不断发展,围绕“无误性”的对话依然充满活力。新一代信徒越来越多地面临着多元观点和科学发现,这些都对传统的圣经解释提出了挑战。这一现实邀请人们就真理的本质和古老文本在当代生活中的相关性进行持续的对话。总之,“无误性”是一个复杂且多面的概念,对许多宗教团体的信仰和实践产生了重大影响。虽然它为理解《圣经》作为值得信赖的指南提供了框架,但它也提出了关于解释、背景和真理本质的重要问题。随着信徒在这些挑战中探索,围绕“无误性”的对话无疑将继续演变,反映出信仰与理性在不断变化的世界中的动态互动。