bounded discretion

简明释义

有限制的处理权

英英释义

例句

1.The CEO's bounded discretion in budget allocation is defined by the company's financial policies.

首席执行官在预算分配上的有限的自由裁量权受到公司财务政策的限制。

2.The teacher's bounded discretion allows her to adapt lesson plans while adhering to the curriculum.

老师的有限的自由裁量权使她能够在遵循课程大纲的同时调整教案。

3.The judge exercised bounded discretion in sentencing, ensuring that the punishment fit within legal guidelines.

法官在判刑时行使了有限的自由裁量权，确保惩罚符合法律规定。

4.Regulatory agencies often have bounded discretion in enforcing laws to ensure compliance.

监管机构在执行法律以确保合规时，通常具有有限的自由裁量权。

5.In making hiring decisions, the manager has bounded discretion to select candidates based on established criteria.

在做出招聘决策时，经理拥有根据既定标准选择候选人的有限的自由裁量权。

作文

In today's complex world, the concept of decision-making is often fraught with challenges and uncertainties. One important term that arises in discussions about authority and governance is bounded discretion. This phrase refers to the limits placed on the freedom of decision-makers to ensure that their choices align with established rules, guidelines, and ethical standards. Understanding bounded discretion is crucial for both public administrators and private sector leaders, as it provides a framework within which they can operate effectively while maintaining accountability.The idea of bounded discretion is particularly relevant in the context of public policy and administration. When government officials are given the authority to make decisions, it is essential that their discretion is not entirely unfettered. For instance, a police officer may have the discretion to decide whether to issue a ticket for a minor traffic violation. However, if this discretion were completely unbounded, it could lead to arbitrary enforcement of the law, resulting in accusations of bias or discrimination. Therefore, policies and regulations are put in place to guide the officer's actions, creating a structure where their discretion is bounded by specific criteria.In the business sector, bounded discretion plays a similar role. Managers often face situations where they must make quick decisions that could significantly impact their organization. While they need some level of autonomy to respond to changing circumstances, their discretion should also be bounded by company policies, ethical standards, and legal requirements. This balance helps protect the organization from potential risks associated with poor decision-making.Moreover, bounded discretion is vital for fostering trust between decision-makers and the communities they serve. When stakeholders are aware that there are checks and balances in place, they are more likely to feel confident in the decisions being made. For example, in healthcare, doctors often exercise bounded discretion when determining treatment plans for patients. Their decisions are informed by medical guidelines and best practices, ensuring that patient care is both effective and equitable.However, the challenge lies in finding the right balance between providing enough discretion for effective decision-making and ensuring that such discretion does not lead to misuse or abuse of power. The concept of bounded discretion encourages organizations to create clear frameworks that delineate the boundaries within which decisions can be made. These frameworks might include performance metrics, ethical guidelines, and oversight mechanisms that help maintain accountability.In conclusion, bounded discretion is a critical concept that underscores the importance of establishing limits on decision-making authority. Whether in public administration or private business, understanding and implementing bounded discretion can lead to better decision-making processes, enhanced accountability, and greater trust among stakeholders. By recognizing the necessity of boundaries in discretion, organizations can navigate the complexities of decision-making while upholding ethical standards and promoting fairness. As we move forward in an increasingly complicated world, the principles of bounded discretion will remain essential in guiding effective leadership and governance.

在当今复杂的世界中，决策的概念常常充满挑战和不确定性。在关于权威和治理的讨论中，一个重要的术语是有限自由裁量权。这个短语指的是对决策者自由选择所施加的限制，以确保他们的选择符合既定的规则、指导方针和道德标准。理解有限自由裁量权对公共管理者和私营部门领导者至关重要，因为它提供了一个可以有效运作的框架，同时保持问责制。有限自由裁量权的概念在公共政策和行政管理的背景下尤为相关。当政府官员被赋予做决定的权力时，确保他们的自由裁量权不是完全不受限制是至关重要的。例如，警察可以自行决定是否对轻微交通违规行为开具罚单。然而，如果这种自由裁量权完全不受限制，可能会导致法律的任意执行，从而引发偏见或歧视的指控。因此，制定政策和规定以指导警官的行为是必要的，形成一个结构，使他们的自由裁量权受到特定标准的限制。在商业领域，有限自由裁量权也发挥着类似的作用。管理者经常面临必须迅速做出可能对组织产生重大影响的决策的情况。虽然他们需要一定程度的自主权来应对变化的情况，但他们的自由裁量权也应该受到公司政策、道德标准和法律要求的限制。这种平衡有助于保护组织免受与糟糕决策相关的潜在风险。此外，有限自由裁量权对于促进决策者与他们所服务社区之间的信任至关重要。当利益相关者意识到存在检查和平衡机制时，他们更有可能对所做的决策感到信心。例如，在医疗保健中，医生在确定患者的治疗方案时通常会行使有限自由裁量权。他们的决策受到医学指南和最佳实践的指导，确保患者护理既有效又公平。然而，挑战在于找到在提供足够自由裁量权以进行有效决策与确保此类自由裁量权不会导致滥用或误用权力之间的正确平衡。有限自由裁量权的概念鼓励组织创建明确的框架，划定可以做出决策的边界。这些框架可能包括绩效指标、道德指南和监督机制，帮助维护问责制。总之，有限自由裁量权是一个关键概念，强调建立对决策权威的限制的重要性。无论是在公共管理还是私营企业中，理解和实施有限自由裁量权都可以导致更好的决策过程、增强的问责制和利益相关者之间更大的信任。通过认识到自由裁量权边界的必要性，组织可以在保持道德标准和促进公平的同时，驾驭决策的复杂性。随着我们在日益复杂的世界中前行，有限自由裁量权的原则将继续在指导有效领导和治理方面发挥重要作用。