merit bad

简明释义

有价值的坏商品

英英释义

例句

1.The movie was so poorly made that it truly merit bad 应得差评 from critics.

这部电影制作得如此糟糕，以至于确实merit bad 应得差评.

2.The product received reviews that merit bad 应得差评 from customers due to its defects.

由于产品缺陷，顾客的评价merit bad 应得差评.

3.His performance in the project was so poor that it could be said to merit bad 应得差评.

他在项目中的表现非常糟糕，可以说merit bad 应得差评.

4.After reviewing the evidence, the committee concluded that the actions of the official merit bad 应得差评.

审查证据后，委员会得出结论，官员的行为merit bad 应得差评.

5.His lack of commitment to the team merit bad 应得差评 during the competition.

在比赛中，他对团队缺乏承诺merit bad 应得差评.

作文

In today’s competitive world, the concept of meritocracy is often discussed, where individuals are rewarded based on their abilities and achievements. However, there are instances where this system can lead to outcomes that are less than ideal, a situation I would refer to as merit bad. The term merit bad can be interpreted as a scenario where the meritocratic system fails to deliver positive results, leading to unfavorable consequences for individuals or society as a whole. In this essay, I will explore the implications of merit bad and how it can manifest in various aspects of life.Firstly, one area where merit bad is evident is in education. In many educational systems, students are ranked based on their test scores and grades, which are seen as indicators of their intelligence and potential. However, this system can sometimes overlook important qualities such as creativity, emotional intelligence, and resilience. When students are judged solely on standardized tests, it can lead to a narrow definition of success, causing some talented individuals to be undervalued. This phenomenon can be described as merit bad, where the meritocratic approach fails to recognize diverse talents and ultimately hampers innovation and growth.Secondly, the workplace is another arena where merit bad can occur. Many companies claim to promote a merit-based culture, yet biases related to gender, race, and socioeconomic background can influence hiring and promotion decisions. For instance, if a company prioritizes certain qualifications or experiences that are more accessible to a specific demographic, it may inadvertently perpetuate inequality. As a result, highly qualified candidates from underrepresented groups may be overlooked, leading to a less diverse and innovative workforce. This situation exemplifies merit bad, where the intention of fostering meritocracy is undermined by systemic biases.Moreover, the concept of merit bad also extends to social policies. Governments often implement policies aimed at rewarding hard work and achievement, but these policies can sometimes exacerbate existing inequalities. For example, tax incentives for high-income earners can be framed as a reward for merit, yet they may contribute to a widening wealth gap. In such cases, the intended benefits of a merit-based system can backfire, resulting in a society where opportunities are increasingly concentrated among the wealthy. This is another illustration of merit bad, where the pursuit of meritocracy leads to unintended negative consequences.To address the challenges posed by merit bad, it is essential to adopt a more holistic approach to evaluating merit. In education, incorporating diverse assessment methods that value creativity and collaboration can help recognize a broader range of talents. In the workplace, organizations should strive to create inclusive environments that actively seek out diverse perspectives and experiences. Lastly, policymakers must consider the broader implications of their decisions and work towards creating systems that genuinely promote equity and opportunity for all.In conclusion, while the idea of meritocracy holds significant appeal, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential pitfalls associated with it, particularly the phenomenon of merit bad. By recognizing the limitations of a purely merit-based approach and striving for a more inclusive understanding of merit, we can create systems that truly reward individual talents and contributions. Ultimately, it is through such efforts that we can foster a society that values diversity and innovation, paving the way for a brighter future for everyone.

在当今竞争激烈的世界中，精英主义的概念经常被讨论，即个人根据其能力和成就获得奖励。然而，在某些情况下，这一制度可能导致不理想的结果，我称之为merit bad。术语merit bad可以理解为一个情境，其中精英主义系统未能产生积极的结果，导致个人或整个社会的不利后果。在这篇文章中，我将探讨merit bad的影响以及它如何在生活的各个方面表现出来。首先，教育领域是merit bad显而易见的一个方面。在许多教育系统中，学生根据考试成绩和分数进行排名，这被视为他们智力和潜力的指标。然而，这一制度有时可能忽视重要的品质，如创造力、情商和韧性。当学生仅根据标准化考试进行评判时，这可能导致成功的狭隘定义，使一些有才能的个体被低估。这种现象可以描述为merit bad，即精英主义方法未能识别多样化的才能，并最终阻碍创新和发展。其次，职场是另一个可能出现merit bad的领域。许多公司声称促进基于优点的文化，但与性别、种族和社会经济背景相关的偏见可能会影响招聘和晋升决策。例如，如果一家公司优先考虑某些资格或经历，而这些资格或经历对特定人群更容易获得，那么它可能会无意中延续不平等。因此，来自代表性不足群体的高素质候选人可能被忽视，导致工作场所缺乏多样性和创新。这种情况体现了merit bad，即促进精英主义的意图被系统性偏见所削弱。此外，merit bad的概念还扩展到社会政策。政府通常实施旨在奖励努力工作和成就的政策，但这些政策有时可能加剧现有的不平等。例如，对高收入者的税收激励可以被视为对优点的奖励，然而，它们可能导致财富差距的扩大。在这种情况下，基于优点的系统的预期好处可能适得其反，导致一个机会越来越集中于富人阶层的社会。这又是merit bad的另一种说明，即追求精英主义导致了意想不到的负面后果。为了解决merit bad带来的挑战，采用更全面的优点评估方法至关重要。在教育中，结合多样的评估方法，重视创造力和合作，可以帮助识别更广泛的人才。在职场中，组织应努力创造包容性环境，积极寻求多样的观点和经验。最后，政策制定者必须考虑他们决策的更广泛影响，致力于创建真正促进公平和机会的系统。总之，尽管精英主义的理念具有重要吸引力，但承认与之相关的潜在陷阱尤其是merit bad现象至关重要。通过认识到单纯基于优点的方法的局限性，并努力追求更具包容性的优点理解，我们可以创建真正奖励个人才能和贡献的系统。最终，正是通过这样的努力，我们才能培养一个重视多样性和创新的社会，为每个人铺平更加光明的未来。