justified claim

简明释义

有根据的索赔要求,有理由的索赔要求

英英释义

例句

1.The lawyer presented a justified claim to support her client's case.

律师提出了一个合理的索赔以支持她客户的案件。

2.The insurance company accepted his justified claim after reviewing all the evidence.

保险公司在审核所有证据后接受了他的合理的索赔。

3.In order to win the lawsuit, they needed to prove that their justified claim was valid.

为了赢得诉讼，他们需要证明他们的合理的索赔是有效的。

4.Her justified claim for damages was backed by extensive documentation.

她的合理的索赔得到了大量文件的支持。

5.The judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff because of the justified claim presented.

法官因为提出的合理的索赔而裁定原告胜诉。

作文

In today's world, the ability to make a justified claim is crucial in various fields, including academia, law, and everyday discussions. A justified claim refers to a statement or assertion that is supported by adequate evidence or reasoning, making it credible and persuasive. This concept is essential for effective communication and critical thinking, as it allows individuals to present their arguments convincingly while also fostering a culture of rational discourse.To illustrate the importance of a justified claim, consider the realm of academic writing. Students are often required to formulate thesis statements and support them with research findings. For instance, if a student argues that climate change is primarily caused by human activities, this statement must be backed by scientific data, expert opinions, and logical reasoning. Without such support, the claim remains weak and unconvincing. Thus, the process of gathering evidence and constructing a well-reasoned argument is vital for transforming a mere opinion into a justified claim.Similarly, in legal contexts, the concept of a justified claim plays a pivotal role. Lawyers must present their cases based on facts, precedents, and legal principles. When a lawyer claims that their client is innocent, they must provide substantial evidence—such as alibis, witness testimonies, and forensic data—to substantiate this assertion. The strength of a legal argument hinges on its ability to present justified claims that can withstand scrutiny in a courtroom setting.Moreover, in everyday conversations, the ability to make justified claims enhances interpersonal communication. When discussing controversial topics, individuals often hold differing opinions. To engage in meaningful dialogue, it is essential to support one’s views with facts and logical reasoning. For example, if someone argues that a particular diet is beneficial for health, they should reference scientific studies or expert recommendations to back up their statement. This practice not only lends credibility to their argument but also encourages others to consider their perspective seriously.However, it is worth noting that not all claims can be easily justified. Some assertions may be subjective or based on personal beliefs, which can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. Therefore, it is important for individuals to recognize the difference between an opinion and a justified claim. While everyone is entitled to their own beliefs, presenting them as facts without evidence can undermine the quality of discourse.In conclusion, the ability to formulate and present justified claims is a vital skill in various aspects of life. Whether in academic writing, legal arguments, or everyday discussions, supporting assertions with evidence and reasoning fosters credibility and promotes constructive dialogue. As we navigate an increasingly complex world filled with information, the importance of making justified claims cannot be overstated. By honing this skill, individuals can contribute to more informed and rational conversations, ultimately leading to better understanding and collaboration among diverse perspectives.

在当今世界，提出一个合理的主张的能力在学术、法律和日常讨论等各个领域都是至关重要的。合理的主张是指一个声明或断言，其有充分的证据或推理支持，使其具有可信性和说服力。这个概念对于有效沟通和批判性思维至关重要，因为它使个人能够有说服力地提出论点，同时也促进了理性话语的文化。为了说明合理的主张的重要性，可以考虑学术写作领域。学生通常需要制定论文陈述，并用研究结果来支持它们。例如，如果一个学生主张气候变化主要是由人类活动引起的，那么这个声明必须有科学数据、专家意见和逻辑推理作为支持。如果没有这样的支持，这个主张就显得薄弱且不具说服力。因此，收集证据和构建合理论点的过程对于将仅仅是观点转变为合理的主张至关重要。同样，在法律背景下，合理的主张的概念发挥着关键作用。律师必须基于事实、先例和法律原则来陈述他们的案件。当律师声称他们的客户是无辜时，他们必须提供实质性的证据——例如不在场证明、证人证言和法医数据——来证明这一断言。法律论点的强度取决于其提出的合理的主张能否经得起法庭审查。此外，在日常对话中，提出合理的主张的能力增强了人际沟通。当讨论有争议的话题时，个人往往持有不同的观点。要进行有意义的对话，支持自己的观点与事实和逻辑推理是至关重要的。例如，如果有人认为某种饮食对健康有益，他们应该引用科学研究或专家推荐来支持他们的声明。这一做法不仅赋予他们的论点可信度，还鼓励他人认真考虑他们的观点。然而，值得注意的是，并非所有的主张都能轻易得到证实。一些断言可能是主观的或基于个人信仰，这可能导致误解和冲突。因此，个人认识到观点和合理的主张之间的区别是重要的。虽然每个人都有权拥有自己的信仰，但如果没有证据就将其作为事实呈现，可能会削弱话语的质量。总之，制定和提出合理的主张的能力是在生活各个方面的一项重要技能。无论是在学术写作、法律论证还是日常讨论中，用证据和推理支持断言，促进了可信度并推动了建设性的对话。随着我们在充满信息的日益复杂的世界中导航，提出合理的主张的重要性不容小觑。通过磨练这项技能，个人可以为更有见地和理性的对话做出贡献，最终促进对不同观点的更好理解和合作。